From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, yinghai@kernel.org,
brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, shaohui.zheng@intel.com,
rientjes@google.com, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@linux.intel.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 11/26] x86-64, NUMA: Use common numa_nodes[]
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:10:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297530663-26234-12-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297530663-26234-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
ACPI and amd are using separate nodes[] array. Add numa_nodes[] and
use them in all NUMA init methods. cutoff_node() cleanup is moved
from srat_64.c to numa_64.c and applied in initmem_init() regardless
of init methods.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h | 1 +
arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c | 19 ++++++++---------
arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c | 43 ++++++++++-----------------------------
4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
index de45936..d3a4514 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ extern void setup_node_bootmem(int nodeid, unsigned long start,
extern nodemask_t cpu_nodes_parsed __initdata;
extern nodemask_t mem_nodes_parsed __initdata;
+extern struct bootnode numa_nodes[MAX_NUMNODES] __initdata;
extern int __cpuinit numa_cpu_node(int cpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
index 4056333..06698b1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
#include <asm/apic.h>
#include <asm/amd_nb.h>
-static struct bootnode __initdata nodes[8];
static unsigned char __initdata nodeids[8];
static __init int find_northbridge(void)
@@ -166,8 +165,8 @@ int __init amd_numa_init(void)
pr_info("Node %d MemBase %016lx Limit %016lx\n",
nodeid, base, limit);
- nodes[nodeid].start = base;
- nodes[nodeid].end = limit;
+ numa_nodes[nodeid].start = base;
+ numa_nodes[nodeid].end = limit;
prevbase = base;
@@ -210,8 +209,8 @@ void __init amd_get_nodes(struct bootnode *physnodes)
int i;
for_each_node_mask(i, mem_nodes_parsed) {
- physnodes[i].start = nodes[i].start;
- physnodes[i].end = nodes[i].end;
+ physnodes[i].start = numa_nodes[i].start;
+ physnodes[i].end = numa_nodes[i].end;
}
}
@@ -221,7 +220,7 @@ static int __init find_node_by_addr(unsigned long addr)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
- if (addr >= nodes[i].start && addr < nodes[i].end) {
+ if (addr >= numa_nodes[i].start && addr < numa_nodes[i].end) {
ret = i;
break;
}
@@ -274,7 +273,7 @@ int __init amd_scan_nodes(void)
{
int i;
- memnode_shift = compute_hash_shift(nodes, 8, NULL);
+ memnode_shift = compute_hash_shift(numa_nodes, 8, NULL);
if (memnode_shift < 0) {
pr_err("No NUMA node hash function found. Contact maintainer\n");
return -1;
@@ -284,9 +283,9 @@ int __init amd_scan_nodes(void)
/* use the coreid bits from early_identify_cpu */
for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map) {
memblock_x86_register_active_regions(i,
- nodes[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
- nodes[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
- setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
+ numa_nodes[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
+ numa_nodes[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+ setup_node_bootmem(i, numa_nodes[i].start, numa_nodes[i].end);
}
numa_init_array();
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index 86be8e3..a0bceaa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ struct memnode memnode;
static unsigned long __initdata nodemap_addr;
static unsigned long __initdata nodemap_size;
+struct bootnode numa_nodes[MAX_NUMNODES] __initdata;
+
/*
* Given a shift value, try to populate memnodemap[]
* Returns :
@@ -182,6 +184,22 @@ static void * __init early_node_mem(int nodeid, unsigned long start,
return NULL;
}
+static __init void cutoff_node(int i, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+{
+ struct bootnode *nd = &numa_nodes[i];
+
+ if (nd->start < start) {
+ nd->start = start;
+ if (nd->end < nd->start)
+ nd->start = nd->end;
+ }
+ if (nd->end > end) {
+ nd->end = end;
+ if (nd->start > nd->end)
+ nd->start = nd->end;
+ }
+}
+
/* Initialize bootmem allocator for a node */
void __init
setup_node_bootmem(int nodeid, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
@@ -636,9 +654,15 @@ void __init initmem_init(void)
nodes_clear(mem_nodes_parsed);
nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
nodes_clear(node_online_map);
+ memset(numa_nodes, 0, sizeof(numa_nodes));
if (numa_init[i]() < 0)
continue;
+
+ /* clean up the node list */
+ for (j = 0; j < MAX_NUMNODES; j++)
+ cutoff_node(j, 0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
setup_physnodes(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, i == 0, i == 1);
if (cmdline && !numa_emulation(0, max_pfn, i == 0, i == 1))
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
index 822bd68..abb17d6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ int acpi_numa __initdata;
static struct acpi_table_slit *acpi_slit;
-static struct bootnode nodes[MAX_NUMNODES] __initdata;
static struct bootnode nodes_add[MAX_NUMNODES];
static int num_node_memblks __initdata;
@@ -55,29 +54,13 @@ static __init int conflicting_memblks(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
return -1;
}
-static __init void cutoff_node(int i, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
-{
- struct bootnode *nd = &nodes[i];
-
- if (nd->start < start) {
- nd->start = start;
- if (nd->end < nd->start)
- nd->start = nd->end;
- }
- if (nd->end > end) {
- nd->end = end;
- if (nd->start > nd->end)
- nd->start = nd->end;
- }
-}
-
static __init void bad_srat(void)
{
int i;
printk(KERN_ERR "SRAT: SRAT not used.\n");
acpi_numa = -1;
for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUMNODES; i++) {
- nodes[i].start = nodes[i].end = 0;
+ numa_nodes[i].start = numa_nodes[i].end = 0;
nodes_add[i].start = nodes_add[i].end = 0;
}
remove_all_active_ranges();
@@ -276,12 +259,12 @@ acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma)
if (i == node) {
printk(KERN_WARNING
"SRAT: Warning: PXM %d (%lx-%lx) overlaps with itself (%Lx-%Lx)\n",
- pxm, start, end, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
+ pxm, start, end, numa_nodes[i].start, numa_nodes[i].end);
} else if (i >= 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR
"SRAT: PXM %d (%lx-%lx) overlaps with PXM %d (%Lx-%Lx)\n",
pxm, start, end, node_to_pxm(i),
- nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
+ numa_nodes[i].start, numa_nodes[i].end);
bad_srat();
return;
}
@@ -290,7 +273,7 @@ acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma)
start, end);
if (!(ma->flags & ACPI_SRAT_MEM_HOT_PLUGGABLE)) {
- nd = &nodes[node];
+ nd = &numa_nodes[node];
if (!node_test_and_set(node, mem_nodes_parsed)) {
nd->start = start;
nd->end = end;
@@ -347,9 +330,8 @@ void __init acpi_get_nodes(struct bootnode *physnodes, unsigned long start,
int i;
for_each_node_mask(i, mem_nodes_parsed) {
- cutoff_node(i, start, end);
- physnodes[i].start = nodes[i].start;
- physnodes[i].end = nodes[i].end;
+ physnodes[i].start = numa_nodes[i].start;
+ physnodes[i].end = numa_nodes[i].end;
}
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_EMU */
@@ -372,10 +354,6 @@ int __init acpi_scan_nodes(void)
if (acpi_numa <= 0)
return -1;
- /* First clean up the node list */
- for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUMNODES; i++)
- cutoff_node(i, 0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
-
/*
* Join together blocks on the same node, holes between
* which don't overlap with memory on other nodes.
@@ -440,19 +418,20 @@ int __init acpi_scan_nodes(void)
/* for out of order entries in SRAT */
sort_node_map();
- if (!nodes_cover_memory(nodes)) {
+ if (!nodes_cover_memory(numa_nodes)) {
bad_srat();
return -1;
}
/* Finally register nodes */
for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map)
- setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
+ setup_node_bootmem(i, numa_nodes[i].start, numa_nodes[i].end);
/* Try again in case setup_node_bootmem missed one due
to missing bootmem */
for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map)
if (!node_online(i))
- setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
+ setup_node_bootmem(i, numa_nodes[i].start,
+ numa_nodes[i].end);
for (i = 0; i < nr_cpu_ids; i++) {
int node = early_cpu_to_node(i);
@@ -484,7 +463,7 @@ static int __init find_node_by_addr(unsigned long addr)
* the sake of simplicity, we only use a real node's starting
* address to determine which emulated node it appears on.
*/
- if (addr >= nodes[i].start && addr < nodes[i].end) {
+ if (addr >= numa_nodes[i].start && addr < numa_nodes[i].end) {
ret = i;
break;
}
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-12 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-12 17:10 [PATCHSET x86/numa] x86-64, NUMA: bring sanity to NUMA configuration Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 01/26] x86-64, NUMA: Make dummy node initialization path similar to non-dummy ones Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:52 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 02/26] x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotplug node handling in acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 17:56 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 18:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 18:06 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 18:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 11:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 16:12 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 03/26] x86-64, NUMA: Drop @start/last_pfn from initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 18:03 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 13:50 ` [PATCH UPDATED 03/26] x86, NUMA: Drop @start/last_pfn from initmem_init() initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 14:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-14 14:58 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 19:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-15 2:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 04/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify {acpi|amd}_{numa_init|scan_nodes}() arguments and return values Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 18:39 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 11:29 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 16:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 16:18 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 18:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 05/26] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap acpi_numa_init() so that failure can be indicated by return value Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 06/26] x86-64, NUMA: Move *_numa_init() invocations into initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 6:10 ` Ankita Garg
2011-02-14 11:09 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 13:51 ` [PATCH UPDATED 06/26] x86, " Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 14:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 07/26] x86-64, NUMA: Restructure initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 08/26] x86-64, NUMA: Use common {cpu|mem}_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 09/26] x86-64, NUMA: Remove local variable found from amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 10/26] x86-64, NUMA: Move apicid to numa mapping initialization from amd_scan_nodes() to amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 22:59 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-02-15 9:36 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-15 17:31 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-02-15 17:54 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-15 18:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-02-15 18:27 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-02-15 19:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 17:10 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 12/26] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd}_get_nodes() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 13/26] x86-64, NUMA: Factor out memblk handling into numa_{add|register}_memblk() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 14/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify use of memblk in all init methods Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 15/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration Tejun Heo
2011-02-13 0:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 11:32 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 16:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 16:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 16:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 16:22 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 18:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 18:27 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 19:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 19:30 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 19:35 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-15 9:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-15 9:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-15 16:49 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 8:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 8:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 9:01 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 9:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 16/26] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd|dummy}_scan_nodes() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 17/26] x86-64, NUMA: Remove %NULL @nodeids handling from compute_hash_shift() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 18/26] x86-64, NUMA: Introduce struct numa_meminfo Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 19/26] x86-64, NUMA: Separate out numa_cleanup_meminfo() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 20/26] x86-64, NUMA: make numa_cleanup_meminfo() prettier Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 21/26] x86-64, NUMA: consolidate and improve memblk sanity checks Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 22/26] x86-64, NUMA: Add common find_node_by_addr() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:11 ` [PATCH 23/26] x86-64, NUMA: kill numa_nodes[] Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:11 ` [PATCH 24/26] x86-64, NUMA: Rename cpu_nodes_parsed to numa_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:11 ` [PATCH 25/26] x86-64, NUMA: Kill mem_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:11 ` [PATCH 26/26] x86-64, NUMA: Implement generic node distance handling Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1297530663-26234-12-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shaohui.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.