From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, yinghai@kernel.org,
brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, shaohui.zheng@intel.com,
rientjes@google.com, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@linux.intel.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 03/26] x86-64, NUMA: Drop @start/last_pfn from initmem_init()
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:10:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297530663-26234-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297530663-26234-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
initmem_init() extensively accesses and modifies global data
structures and the parameters aren't even followed depending on which
path is being used. Drop @start/last_pfn and let it deal with
@max_pfn directly. This is in preparation for further NUMA init
cleanups.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h | 3 +--
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 5 ++---
arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h
index 1df6621..95892a1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h
@@ -48,8 +48,7 @@ extern unsigned long max_pfn_mapped;
extern unsigned long init_memory_mapping(unsigned long start,
unsigned long end);
-extern void initmem_init(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
- int acpi, int k8);
+extern void initmem_init(int acpi, int k8);
extern void free_initmem(void);
#endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 1202341..c50ba3d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -996,7 +996,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
amd = !amd_numa_init(0, max_pfn);
#endif
- initmem_init(0, max_pfn, acpi, amd);
+ initmem_init(acpi, amd);
memblock_find_dma_reserve();
dma32_reserve_bootmem();
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
index 71a5929..26e4e73 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
@@ -612,10 +612,9 @@ kernel_physical_mapping_init(unsigned long start,
}
#ifndef CONFIG_NUMA
-void __init initmem_init(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
- int acpi, int k8)
+void __init initmem_init(int acpi, int k8)
{
- memblock_x86_register_active_regions(0, start_pfn, end_pfn);
+ memblock_x86_register_active_regions(0, 0, max_pfn);
}
#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index ea5dd48..f534feb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -578,8 +578,7 @@ static int __init numa_emulation(unsigned long start_pfn,
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_EMU */
-void __init initmem_init(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long last_pfn,
- int acpi, int amd)
+void __init initmem_init(int acpi, int amd)
{
int i;
@@ -587,19 +586,16 @@ void __init initmem_init(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long last_pfn,
nodes_clear(node_online_map);
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
- setup_physnodes(start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, last_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
- acpi, amd);
- if (cmdline && !numa_emulation(start_pfn, last_pfn, acpi, amd))
+ setup_physnodes(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, acpi, amd);
+ if (cmdline && !numa_emulation(0, max_pfn, acpi, amd))
return;
- setup_physnodes(start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, last_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
- acpi, amd);
+ setup_physnodes(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, acpi, amd);
nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
nodes_clear(node_online_map);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
- if (!numa_off && acpi && !acpi_scan_nodes(start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
- last_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT))
+ if (!numa_off && acpi && !acpi_scan_nodes(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT))
return;
nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
nodes_clear(node_online_map);
@@ -615,8 +611,7 @@ void __init initmem_init(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long last_pfn,
numa_off ? "NUMA turned off" : "No NUMA configuration found");
printk(KERN_INFO "Faking a node at %016lx-%016lx\n",
- start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
- last_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
+ 0LU, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
/* setup dummy node covering all memory */
memnode_shift = 63;
memnodemap = memnode.embedded_map;
@@ -625,8 +620,8 @@ void __init initmem_init(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long last_pfn,
node_set(0, node_possible_map);
for (i = 0; i < MAX_LOCAL_APIC; i++)
set_apicid_to_node(i, NUMA_NO_NODE);
- memblock_x86_register_active_regions(0, start_pfn, last_pfn);
- setup_node_bootmem(0, start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, last_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
+ memblock_x86_register_active_regions(0, 0, max_pfn);
+ setup_node_bootmem(0, 0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
numa_init_array();
}
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-12 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-12 17:10 [PATCHSET x86/numa] x86-64, NUMA: bring sanity to NUMA configuration Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 01/26] x86-64, NUMA: Make dummy node initialization path similar to non-dummy ones Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:52 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 02/26] x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotplug node handling in acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 17:56 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 18:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 18:06 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 18:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 11:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 16:12 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 17:10 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-02-12 17:58 ` [PATCH 03/26] x86-64, NUMA: Drop @start/last_pfn from initmem_init() Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 18:03 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 13:50 ` [PATCH UPDATED 03/26] x86, NUMA: Drop @start/last_pfn from initmem_init() initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 14:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-14 14:58 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 19:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-15 2:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 04/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify {acpi|amd}_{numa_init|scan_nodes}() arguments and return values Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 18:39 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 11:29 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 16:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 16:18 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 18:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 05/26] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap acpi_numa_init() so that failure can be indicated by return value Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 06/26] x86-64, NUMA: Move *_numa_init() invocations into initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 6:10 ` Ankita Garg
2011-02-14 11:09 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 13:51 ` [PATCH UPDATED 06/26] x86, " Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 14:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 07/26] x86-64, NUMA: Restructure initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 08/26] x86-64, NUMA: Use common {cpu|mem}_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 09/26] x86-64, NUMA: Remove local variable found from amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 10/26] x86-64, NUMA: Move apicid to numa mapping initialization from amd_scan_nodes() to amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 22:59 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-02-15 9:36 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-15 17:31 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-02-15 17:54 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-15 18:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-02-15 18:27 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-02-15 19:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 11/26] x86-64, NUMA: Use common numa_nodes[] Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 12/26] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd}_get_nodes() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 13/26] x86-64, NUMA: Factor out memblk handling into numa_{add|register}_memblk() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 14/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify use of memblk in all init methods Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 15/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration Tejun Heo
2011-02-13 0:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 11:32 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 16:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 16:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 16:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 16:22 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 18:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 18:27 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 19:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 19:30 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 19:35 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-15 9:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-15 9:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-15 16:49 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 8:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 8:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 9:01 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 9:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 16/26] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd|dummy}_scan_nodes() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 17/26] x86-64, NUMA: Remove %NULL @nodeids handling from compute_hash_shift() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 18/26] x86-64, NUMA: Introduce struct numa_meminfo Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 19/26] x86-64, NUMA: Separate out numa_cleanup_meminfo() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 20/26] x86-64, NUMA: make numa_cleanup_meminfo() prettier Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 21/26] x86-64, NUMA: consolidate and improve memblk sanity checks Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 22/26] x86-64, NUMA: Add common find_node_by_addr() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:11 ` [PATCH 23/26] x86-64, NUMA: kill numa_nodes[] Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:11 ` [PATCH 24/26] x86-64, NUMA: Rename cpu_nodes_parsed to numa_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:11 ` [PATCH 25/26] x86-64, NUMA: Kill mem_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:11 ` [PATCH 26/26] x86-64, NUMA: Implement generic node distance handling Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1297530663-26234-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shaohui.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.