All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, yinghai@kernel.org,
	brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, shaohui.zheng@intel.com,
	rientjes@google.com, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@linux.intel.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 08/26] x86-64, NUMA: Use common {cpu|mem}_nodes_parsed
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:10:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297530663-26234-9-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297530663-26234-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

ACPI and amd are using separate nodes_parsed masks.  Add
{cpu|mem}_nodes_parsed and use them in all NUMA init methods.
Initialization of the masks and building node_possible_map are now
handled commonly by initmem_init().

dummy_numa_init() is updated to set node 0 on both masks.  While at
it, move the info messages from scan to init.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h |    3 +++
 arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c   |   10 ++++------
 arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c          |   25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
 arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c          |   17 ++++++-----------
 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
index 2819afa..de45936 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ extern void setup_node_bootmem(int nodeid, unsigned long start,
  */
 #define NODE_MIN_SIZE (4*1024*1024)
 
+extern nodemask_t cpu_nodes_parsed __initdata;
+extern nodemask_t mem_nodes_parsed __initdata;
+
 extern int __cpuinit numa_cpu_node(int cpu);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
index ee70257..3180d96 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
 
 static struct bootnode __initdata nodes[8];
 static unsigned char __initdata nodeids[8];
-static nodemask_t __initdata nodes_parsed = NODE_MASK_NONE;
 
 static __init int find_northbridge(void)
 {
@@ -123,7 +122,7 @@ int __init amd_numa_init(void)
 			       nodeid, (base >> 8) & 3, (limit >> 8) & 3);
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
-		if (node_isset(nodeid, nodes_parsed)) {
+		if (node_isset(nodeid, mem_nodes_parsed)) {
 			pr_info("Node %d already present, skipping\n",
 				nodeid);
 			continue;
@@ -173,7 +172,8 @@ int __init amd_numa_init(void)
 
 		prevbase = base;
 
-		node_set(nodeid, nodes_parsed);
+		node_set(nodeid, mem_nodes_parsed);
+		node_set(nodeid, cpu_nodes_parsed);
 	}
 
 	if (!found)
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ void __init amd_get_nodes(struct bootnode *physnodes)
 {
 	int i;
 
-	for_each_node_mask(i, nodes_parsed) {
+	for_each_node_mask(i, mem_nodes_parsed) {
 		physnodes[i].start = nodes[i].start;
 		physnodes[i].end = nodes[i].end;
 	}
@@ -258,8 +258,6 @@ int __init amd_scan_nodes(void)
 	unsigned int apicid_base;
 	int i;
 
-	BUG_ON(nodes_empty(nodes_parsed));
-	node_possible_map = nodes_parsed;
 	memnode_shift = compute_hash_shift(nodes, 8, NULL);
 	if (memnode_shift < 0) {
 		pr_err("No NUMA node hash function found. Contact maintainer\n");
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index ba7e5b6..86be8e3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -25,6 +25,9 @@
 struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_data);
 
+nodemask_t cpu_nodes_parsed __initdata;
+nodemask_t mem_nodes_parsed __initdata;
+
 struct memnode memnode;
 
 static unsigned long __initdata nodemap_addr;
@@ -581,22 +584,23 @@ static int __init numa_emulation(unsigned long start_pfn,
 
 static int dummy_numa_init(void)
 {
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int dummy_scan_nodes(void)
-{
 	printk(KERN_INFO "%s\n",
 	       numa_off ? "NUMA turned off" : "No NUMA configuration found");
 	printk(KERN_INFO "Faking a node at %016lx-%016lx\n",
 	       0LU, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
 
+	node_set(0, cpu_nodes_parsed);
+	node_set(0, mem_nodes_parsed);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int dummy_scan_nodes(void)
+{
 	/* setup dummy node covering all memory */
 	memnode_shift = 63;
 	memnodemap = memnode.embedded_map;
 	memnodemap[0] = 0;
-	node_set_online(0);
-	node_set(0, node_possible_map);
 	memblock_x86_register_active_regions(0, 0, max_pfn);
 	setup_node_bootmem(0, 0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
 	numa_init_array();
@@ -628,6 +632,8 @@ void __init initmem_init(void)
 		for (j = 0; j < MAX_LOCAL_APIC; j++)
 			set_apicid_to_node(j, NUMA_NO_NODE);
 
+		nodes_clear(cpu_nodes_parsed);
+		nodes_clear(mem_nodes_parsed);
 		nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
 		nodes_clear(node_online_map);
 
@@ -641,6 +647,11 @@ void __init initmem_init(void)
 		nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
 		nodes_clear(node_online_map);
 #endif
+		/* Account for nodes with cpus and no memory */
+		nodes_or(node_possible_map, mem_nodes_parsed, cpu_nodes_parsed);
+		if (WARN_ON(nodes_empty(node_possible_map)))
+			continue;
+
 		if (!scan_nodes[i]())
 			return;
 	}
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
index 2da8b65..822bd68 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
@@ -28,8 +28,6 @@ int acpi_numa __initdata;
 
 static struct acpi_table_slit *acpi_slit;
 
-static nodemask_t nodes_parsed __initdata;
-static nodemask_t cpu_nodes_parsed __initdata;
 static struct bootnode nodes[MAX_NUMNODES] __initdata;
 static struct bootnode nodes_add[MAX_NUMNODES];
 
@@ -293,7 +291,7 @@ acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma)
 
 	if (!(ma->flags & ACPI_SRAT_MEM_HOT_PLUGGABLE)) {
 		nd = &nodes[node];
-		if (!node_test_and_set(node, nodes_parsed)) {
+		if (!node_test_and_set(node, mem_nodes_parsed)) {
 			nd->start = start;
 			nd->end = end;
 		} else {
@@ -319,7 +317,7 @@ static int __init nodes_cover_memory(const struct bootnode *nodes)
 	unsigned long pxmram, e820ram;
 
 	pxmram = 0;
-	for_each_node_mask(i, nodes_parsed) {
+	for_each_node_mask(i, mem_nodes_parsed) {
 		unsigned long s = nodes[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 		unsigned long e = nodes[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 		pxmram += e - s;
@@ -348,7 +346,7 @@ void __init acpi_get_nodes(struct bootnode *physnodes, unsigned long start,
 {
 	int i;
 
-	for_each_node_mask(i, nodes_parsed) {
+	for_each_node_mask(i, mem_nodes_parsed) {
 		cutoff_node(i, start, end);
 		physnodes[i].start = nodes[i].start;
 		physnodes[i].end = nodes[i].end;
@@ -447,9 +445,6 @@ int __init acpi_scan_nodes(void)
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	/* Account for nodes with cpus and no memory */
-	nodes_or(node_possible_map, nodes_parsed, cpu_nodes_parsed);
-
 	/* Finally register nodes */
 	for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map)
 		setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
@@ -483,7 +478,7 @@ static int __init find_node_by_addr(unsigned long addr)
 	int ret = NUMA_NO_NODE;
 	int i;
 
-	for_each_node_mask(i, nodes_parsed) {
+	for_each_node_mask(i, mem_nodes_parsed) {
 		/*
 		 * Find the real node that this emulated node appears on.  For
 		 * the sake of simplicity, we only use a real node's starting
@@ -543,10 +538,10 @@ void __init acpi_fake_nodes(const struct bootnode *fake_nodes, int num_nodes)
 		__acpi_map_pxm_to_node(fake_node_to_pxm_map[i], i);
 	memcpy(__apicid_to_node, fake_apicid_to_node, sizeof(__apicid_to_node));
 
-	nodes_clear(nodes_parsed);
+	nodes_clear(mem_nodes_parsed);
 	for (i = 0; i < num_nodes; i++)
 		if (fake_nodes[i].start != fake_nodes[i].end)
-			node_set(i, nodes_parsed);
+			node_set(i, mem_nodes_parsed);
 }
 
 static int null_slit_node_compare(int a, int b)
-- 
1.7.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-12 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-12 17:10 [PATCHSET x86/numa] x86-64, NUMA: bring sanity to NUMA configuration Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 01/26] x86-64, NUMA: Make dummy node initialization path similar to non-dummy ones Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:52   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 02/26] x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotplug node handling in acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:47   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 17:56     ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 18:04       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 18:06         ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 18:13           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 11:25             ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 16:12               ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 03/26] x86-64, NUMA: Drop @start/last_pfn from initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:58   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 18:03     ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 13:50   ` [PATCH UPDATED 03/26] x86, NUMA: Drop @start/last_pfn from initmem_init() initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 14:20     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-14 14:58       ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 19:03         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 19:31           ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-15  2:29             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 04/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify {acpi|amd}_{numa_init|scan_nodes}() arguments and return values Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 18:39   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 11:29     ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 16:14       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 16:18         ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 18:00           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 05/26] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap acpi_numa_init() so that failure can be indicated by return value Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 06/26] x86-64, NUMA: Move *_numa_init() invocations into initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-14  6:10   ` Ankita Garg
2011-02-14 11:09     ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 13:51   ` [PATCH UPDATED 06/26] x86, " Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 14:21     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 07/26] x86-64, NUMA: Restructure initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 09/26] x86-64, NUMA: Remove local variable found from amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 10/26] x86-64, NUMA: Move apicid to numa mapping initialization from amd_scan_nodes() to amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 22:59   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-02-15  9:36     ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-15 17:31       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-02-15 17:54         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-15 18:01           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-02-15 18:27             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-02-15 19:41             ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 11/26] x86-64, NUMA: Use common numa_nodes[] Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 12/26] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd}_get_nodes() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 13/26] x86-64, NUMA: Factor out memblk handling into numa_{add|register}_memblk() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 14/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify use of memblk in all init methods Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 15/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration Tejun Heo
2011-02-13  0:45   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 11:32     ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 16:08       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 16:12         ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 16:17           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 16:22             ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 18:14               ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 18:27                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 19:07                   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 19:30                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 19:35                       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-15  9:11                         ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-15  9:43                           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-15 16:49                             ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16  8:41                               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16  8:48                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16  9:01                                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16  9:31                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 16/26] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd|dummy}_scan_nodes() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 17/26] x86-64, NUMA: Remove %NULL @nodeids handling from compute_hash_shift() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 18/26] x86-64, NUMA: Introduce struct numa_meminfo Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 19/26] x86-64, NUMA: Separate out numa_cleanup_meminfo() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 20/26] x86-64, NUMA: make numa_cleanup_meminfo() prettier Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 21/26] x86-64, NUMA: consolidate and improve memblk sanity checks Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 22/26] x86-64, NUMA: Add common find_node_by_addr() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:11 ` [PATCH 23/26] x86-64, NUMA: kill numa_nodes[] Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:11 ` [PATCH 24/26] x86-64, NUMA: Rename cpu_nodes_parsed to numa_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:11 ` [PATCH 25/26] x86-64, NUMA: Kill mem_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:11 ` [PATCH 26/26] x86-64, NUMA: Implement generic node distance handling Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1297530663-26234-9-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=shaohui.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.