All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>,
	Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched, rt: Fix rq->rt.pushable_tasks bug in push_rt_task()
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 04:33:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1308278005.15063.12.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110617015919.136959032@goodmis.org>

On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 21:55 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> plain text document attachment
> (0004-sched-rt-Fix-rq-rt.pushable_tasks-bug-in-push_rt_tas.patch)
> From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
> 
> Do not call dequeue_pushable_task() when failing to push an eligible
> task, as it remains pushable, merely not at this particular moment.
> 
> Cc: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@gmx.de>

Mixing addresses doesn't work.  Less bouncy SOB.

Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>


> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1306895385.4791.26.camel@marge.simson.net
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
>  kernel/sched_rt.c |   15 ++++++++-------
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> index a6f1f64..7737d41 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> @@ -1378,6 +1378,7 @@ static int push_rt_task(struct rq *rq)
>  {
>  	struct task_struct *next_task;
>  	struct rq *lowest_rq;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	if (!rq->rt.overloaded)
>  		return 0;
> @@ -1410,7 +1411,7 @@ retry:
>  	if (!lowest_rq) {
>  		struct task_struct *task;
>  		/*
> -		 * find lock_lowest_rq releases rq->lock
> +		 * find_lock_lowest_rq releases rq->lock
>  		 * so it is possible that next_task has migrated.
>  		 *
>  		 * We need to make sure that the task is still on the same
> @@ -1420,12 +1421,11 @@ retry:
>  		task = pick_next_pushable_task(rq);
>  		if (task_cpu(next_task) == rq->cpu && task == next_task) {
>  			/*
> -			 * If we get here, the task hasn't moved at all, but
> -			 * it has failed to push.  We will not try again,
> -			 * since the other cpus will pull from us when they
> -			 * are ready.
> +			 * The task hasn't migrated, and is still the next
> +			 * eligible task, but we failed to find a run-queue
> +			 * to push it to.  Do not retry in this case, since
> +			 * other cpus will pull from us when ready.
>  			 */
> -			dequeue_pushable_task(rq, next_task);
>  			goto out;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -1444,6 +1444,7 @@ retry:
>  	deactivate_task(rq, next_task, 0);
>  	set_task_cpu(next_task, lowest_rq->cpu);
>  	activate_task(lowest_rq, next_task, 0);
> +	ret = 1;
>  
>  	resched_task(lowest_rq->curr);
>  
> @@ -1452,7 +1453,7 @@ retry:
>  out:
>  	put_task_struct(next_task);
>  
> -	return 1;
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static void push_rt_tasks(struct rq *rq)



  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-17  2:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-17  1:55 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: various updates to the scheduler Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17  1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] sched: Fix need_resched() when checking peempt Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17  1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] sched: Remove noop in next_prio() Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17  1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] sched: Remove noop in lowest_flag_domain() Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17  1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched, rt: Fix rq->rt.pushable_tasks bug in push_rt_task() Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17  2:33   ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2011-06-17  2:41     ` Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17  1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] sched: Remove resetting exec_start in put_prev_task_rt() Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17  1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] sched: Balance RT tasks when forked as well Steven Rostedt
2011-07-26 12:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-26 12:35     ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-26 12:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-26 12:50         ` Steven Rostedt
2011-08-14 16:05   ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17  1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] sched: Use pushable_tasks to determine next highest prio Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17  2:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: various updates to the scheduler Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1308278005.15063.12.camel@marge.simson.net \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.