From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] sched: Balance RT tasks when forked as well
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:50:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311684607.3526.67.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311683818.24752.34.camel@twins>
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 14:36 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 08:35 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 14:25 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 21:55 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > + /* For anything but wake ups, just return the task_cpu */
> > > > + if (sd_flag != SD_BALANCE_WAKE || sd_flag != SD_BALANCE_FORK)
> > >
> > > So we call select_task_rq() with SD_BALANCE_{WAKE,EXEC,FORK},
> > >
> > > (WAKE != WAKE -> 0 || WAKE != FORK -> 1) -> 1
> > > (EXEC != WAKE -> 1 ) -> 1
> > > (FORK != WAKE -> 1 ) -> 1
> > >
> > > IOW, you never end up doing anything now.. surely you didn't mean that?!
> >
> > Bah!
> >
> > s/||/&&/
>
> So you only want to rebalance on EXEC? The comment says you want to
> balance on wakeups. Please as to unconfuse!?
The patch is (with fixup):
+ /* For anything but wake ups, just return the task_cpu */
+ if (sd_flag != SD_BALANCE_WAKE && sd_flag != SD_BALANCE_FORK)
+ goto out;
In other words, if it isn't a WAKE or FORK (FORK being new task wakeup)
then exit the routine.
EXEC should not rebalance.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-26 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-17 1:55 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: various updates to the scheduler Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17 1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] sched: Fix need_resched() when checking peempt Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17 1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] sched: Remove noop in next_prio() Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17 1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] sched: Remove noop in lowest_flag_domain() Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17 1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched, rt: Fix rq->rt.pushable_tasks bug in push_rt_task() Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17 2:33 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-06-17 2:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17 1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] sched: Remove resetting exec_start in put_prev_task_rt() Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17 1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] sched: Balance RT tasks when forked as well Steven Rostedt
2011-07-26 12:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-26 12:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-26 12:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-26 12:50 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2011-08-14 16:05 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17 1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] sched: Use pushable_tasks to determine next highest prio Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17 2:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: various updates to the scheduler Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1311684607.3526.67.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.