* [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: intel_prepare_ddi_buffers should be static
@ 2012-11-23 17:30 Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-23 17:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: remove Haswell code from ironlake_fdi_pll_enable Paulo Zanoni
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paulo Zanoni @ 2012-11-23 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Paulo Zanoni
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
It's not even declared on header files.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
index 852012b..16d3e78 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
@@ -84,7 +84,8 @@ static enum port intel_ddi_get_encoder_port(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder)
* in either FDI or DP modes only, as HDMI connections will work with both
* of those
*/
-void intel_prepare_ddi_buffers(struct drm_device *dev, enum port port, bool use_fdi_mode)
+static void intel_prepare_ddi_buffers(struct drm_device *dev, enum port port,
+ bool use_fdi_mode)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
u32 reg;
--
1.7.11.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: remove Haswell code from ironlake_fdi_pll_enable
2012-11-23 17:30 [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: intel_prepare_ddi_buffers should be static Paulo Zanoni
@ 2012-11-23 17:30 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-23 17:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: add HAS_DDI check Paulo Zanoni
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paulo Zanoni @ 2012-11-23 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Paulo Zanoni
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
This function is not called on Haswell anymore.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 18 +++++++-----------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 3f7f62d..576eec0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -2840,18 +2840,14 @@ static void ironlake_fdi_pll_enable(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc)
POSTING_READ(reg);
udelay(200);
- /* On Haswell, the PLL configuration for ports and pipes is handled
- * separately, as part of DDI setup */
- if (!IS_HASWELL(dev)) {
- /* Enable CPU FDI TX PLL, always on for Ironlake */
- reg = FDI_TX_CTL(pipe);
- temp = I915_READ(reg);
- if ((temp & FDI_TX_PLL_ENABLE) == 0) {
- I915_WRITE(reg, temp | FDI_TX_PLL_ENABLE);
+ /* Enable CPU FDI TX PLL, always on for Ironlake */
+ reg = FDI_TX_CTL(pipe);
+ temp = I915_READ(reg);
+ if ((temp & FDI_TX_PLL_ENABLE) == 0) {
+ I915_WRITE(reg, temp | FDI_TX_PLL_ENABLE);
- POSTING_READ(reg);
- udelay(100);
- }
+ POSTING_READ(reg);
+ udelay(100);
}
}
--
1.7.11.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: add HAS_DDI check
2012-11-23 17:30 [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: intel_prepare_ddi_buffers should be static Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-23 17:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: remove Haswell code from ironlake_fdi_pll_enable Paulo Zanoni
@ 2012-11-23 17:30 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-23 17:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: only call intel_prepare_ddi if HAS_DDI Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-29 13:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: intel_prepare_ddi_buffers should be static Imre Deak
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paulo Zanoni @ 2012-11-23 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Paulo Zanoni
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
And use it whenever we call code that uses the DDIs. We already have
intel_ddi.c and prefix every function with intel_ddi_something instead of
haswell_something, so I think replacing the checks with HAS_DDI makes more
sense. Just a cosmetical change, yes I know, but I have this OCD...
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 19 +++++++++----------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 8 ++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c | 4 ++--
6 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 87c06f9..7220793 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1208,6 +1208,8 @@ struct drm_i915_file_private {
#define HAS_PIPE_CONTROL(dev) (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5)
+#define HAS_DDI(dev) (IS_HASWELL(dev))
+
#define INTEL_PCH_DEVICE_ID_MASK 0xff00
#define INTEL_PCH_IBX_DEVICE_ID_TYPE 0x3b00
#define INTEL_PCH_CPT_DEVICE_ID_TYPE 0x1c00
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
index 5c77743..bc07b3f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
@@ -771,7 +771,7 @@ void intel_crt_init(struct drm_device *dev)
crt->base.disable = intel_disable_crt;
crt->base.enable = intel_enable_crt;
- if (IS_HASWELL(dev))
+ if (HAS_DDI(dev))
crt->base.get_hw_state = intel_ddi_get_hw_state;
else
crt->base.get_hw_state = intel_crt_get_hw_state;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
index 16d3e78..197dede 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ void intel_prepare_ddi(struct drm_device *dev)
{
int port;
- if (IS_HASWELL(dev)) {
+ if (HAS_DDI(dev)) {
for (port = PORT_A; port < PORT_E; port++)
intel_prepare_ddi_buffers(dev, port, false);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 576eec0..d887cbc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -1125,8 +1125,8 @@ static void assert_fdi_tx(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_pipe_to_cpu_transcoder(dev_priv,
pipe);
- if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv->dev)) {
- /* On Haswell, DDI is used instead of FDI_TX_CTL */
+ if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv->dev)) {
+ /* DDI does not have a specific FDI_TX register */
reg = TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL(cpu_transcoder);
val = I915_READ(reg);
cur_state = !!(val & TRANS_DDI_FUNC_ENABLE);
@@ -1170,7 +1170,7 @@ static void assert_fdi_tx_pll_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
return;
/* On Haswell, DDI ports are responsible for the FDI PLL setup */
- if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv->dev))
+ if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv->dev))
return;
reg = FDI_TX_CTL(pipe);
@@ -8121,7 +8121,7 @@ static const struct drm_crtc_funcs intel_crtc_funcs = {
static void intel_cpu_pll_init(struct drm_device *dev)
{
- if (IS_HASWELL(dev))
+ if (HAS_DDI(dev))
intel_ddi_pll_init(dev);
}
@@ -8257,11 +8257,10 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_device *dev)
I915_WRITE(PFIT_CONTROL, 0);
}
- if (!(IS_HASWELL(dev) &&
- (I915_READ(DDI_BUF_CTL(PORT_A)) & DDI_A_4_LANES)))
+ if (!(HAS_DDI(dev) && (I915_READ(DDI_BUF_CTL(PORT_A)) & DDI_A_4_LANES)))
intel_crt_init(dev);
- if (IS_HASWELL(dev)) {
+ if (HAS_DDI(dev)) {
int found;
/* Haswell uses DDI functions to detect digital outputs */
@@ -8505,7 +8504,7 @@ static void intel_init_display(struct drm_device *dev)
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
/* We always want a DPMS function */
- if (IS_HASWELL(dev)) {
+ if (HAS_DDI(dev)) {
dev_priv->display.crtc_mode_set = haswell_crtc_mode_set;
dev_priv->display.crtc_enable = haswell_crtc_enable;
dev_priv->display.crtc_disable = haswell_crtc_disable;
@@ -8993,7 +8992,7 @@ void intel_modeset_setup_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev)
struct intel_encoder *encoder;
struct intel_connector *connector;
- if (IS_HASWELL(dev)) {
+ if (HAS_DDI(dev)) {
tmp = I915_READ(TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL(TRANSCODER_EDP));
if (tmp & TRANS_DDI_FUNC_ENABLE) {
@@ -9034,7 +9033,7 @@ void intel_modeset_setup_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev)
crtc->active ? "enabled" : "disabled");
}
- if (IS_HASWELL(dev))
+ if (HAS_DDI(dev))
intel_ddi_setup_hw_pll_state(dev);
list_for_each_entry(encoder, &dev->mode_config.encoder_list,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index d76258d..f290438 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_ch(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
* clock divider.
*/
if (is_cpu_edp(intel_dp)) {
- if (IS_HASWELL(dev))
+ if (HAS_DDI(dev))
aux_clock_divider = intel_ddi_get_cdclk_freq(dev_priv) >> 1;
else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
aux_clock_divider = 100;
@@ -1791,7 +1791,7 @@ intel_dp_start_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
int voltage_tries, loop_tries;
uint32_t DP = intel_dp->DP;
- if (IS_HASWELL(dev))
+ if (HAS_DDI(dev))
intel_ddi_prepare_link_retrain(encoder);
/* Write the link configuration data */
@@ -1981,7 +1981,7 @@ intel_dp_link_down(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
* intel_ddi_prepare_link_retrain will take care of redoing the link
* train.
*/
- if (IS_HASWELL(dev))
+ if (HAS_DDI(dev))
return;
if (WARN_ON((I915_READ(intel_dp->output_reg) & DP_PORT_EN) == 0))
@@ -2742,7 +2742,7 @@ intel_dp_init_connector(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
intel_connector_attach_encoder(intel_connector, intel_encoder);
drm_sysfs_connector_add(connector);
- if (IS_HASWELL(dev))
+ if (HAS_DDI(dev))
intel_connector->get_hw_state = intel_ddi_connector_get_hw_state;
else
intel_connector->get_hw_state = intel_connector_get_hw_state;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
index 5c279b4..4ac5ed5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ assert_hdmi_port_disabled(struct intel_hdmi *intel_hdmi)
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
uint32_t enabled_bits;
- enabled_bits = IS_HASWELL(dev) ? DDI_BUF_CTL_ENABLE : SDVO_ENABLE;
+ enabled_bits = HAS_DDI(dev) ? DDI_BUF_CTL_ENABLE : SDVO_ENABLE;
WARN(I915_READ(intel_hdmi->sdvox_reg) & enabled_bits,
"HDMI port enabled, expecting disabled\n");
@@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ void intel_hdmi_init_connector(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
intel_hdmi->set_infoframes = cpt_set_infoframes;
}
- if (IS_HASWELL(dev))
+ if (HAS_DDI(dev))
intel_connector->get_hw_state = intel_ddi_connector_get_hw_state;
else
intel_connector->get_hw_state = intel_connector_get_hw_state;
--
1.7.11.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: only call intel_prepare_ddi if HAS_DDI
2012-11-23 17:30 [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: intel_prepare_ddi_buffers should be static Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-23 17:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: remove Haswell code from ironlake_fdi_pll_enable Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-23 17:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: add HAS_DDI check Paulo Zanoni
@ 2012-11-23 17:30 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-23 17:54 ` Chris Wilson
2012-11-23 18:46 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: invert the log inside intel_prepare_ddi Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-29 13:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: intel_prepare_ddi_buffers should be static Imre Deak
3 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paulo Zanoni @ 2012-11-23 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Paulo Zanoni
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
In other words, move the check from inside the function to outside it.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 16 +++++++---------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
index 197dede..e53e6fb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
@@ -115,16 +115,14 @@ void intel_prepare_ddi(struct drm_device *dev)
{
int port;
- if (HAS_DDI(dev)) {
- for (port = PORT_A; port < PORT_E; port++)
- intel_prepare_ddi_buffers(dev, port, false);
+ for (port = PORT_A; port < PORT_E; port++)
+ intel_prepare_ddi_buffers(dev, port, false);
- /* DDI E is the suggested one to work in FDI mode, so program is as such by
- * default. It will have to be re-programmed in case a digital DP output
- * will be detected on it
- */
- intel_prepare_ddi_buffers(dev, PORT_E, true);
- }
+ /* DDI E is the suggested one to work in FDI mode, so program is as such
+ * by default. It will have to be re-programmed in case a digital DP
+ * output will be detected on it
+ */
+ intel_prepare_ddi_buffers(dev, PORT_E, true);
}
static const long hsw_ddi_buf_ctl_values[] = {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index d887cbc..2c3932e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -8742,7 +8742,8 @@ void intel_modeset_init_hw(struct drm_device *dev)
*/
intel_init_power_wells(dev);
- intel_prepare_ddi(dev);
+ if (HAS_DDI(dev))
+ intel_prepare_ddi(dev);
intel_init_clock_gating(dev);
--
1.7.11.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: only call intel_prepare_ddi if HAS_DDI
2012-11-23 17:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: only call intel_prepare_ddi if HAS_DDI Paulo Zanoni
@ 2012-11-23 17:54 ` Chris Wilson
2012-11-23 18:46 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: invert the log inside intel_prepare_ddi Paulo Zanoni
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2012-11-23 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paulo Zanoni, intel-gfx; +Cc: Paulo Zanoni
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:30:40 -0200, Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
>
> In other words, move the check from inside the function to outside it.
Don't agree with this last step. You can make the function tidier with
an early return, but it is paramount that the high level sequence inside
intel_modeset_init_hw() be clear and comprehendable.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/i915: invert the log inside intel_prepare_ddi
2012-11-23 17:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: only call intel_prepare_ddi if HAS_DDI Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-23 17:54 ` Chris Wilson
@ 2012-11-23 18:46 ` Paulo Zanoni
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paulo Zanoni @ 2012-11-23 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Paulo Zanoni
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Do an early return in case we don't have DDI instead of having the
whole function inside an "if" statement.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
index 197dede..ad936c6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
@@ -115,16 +115,17 @@ void intel_prepare_ddi(struct drm_device *dev)
{
int port;
- if (HAS_DDI(dev)) {
- for (port = PORT_A; port < PORT_E; port++)
- intel_prepare_ddi_buffers(dev, port, false);
+ if (!HAS_DDI(dev))
+ return;
- /* DDI E is the suggested one to work in FDI mode, so program is as such by
- * default. It will have to be re-programmed in case a digital DP output
- * will be detected on it
- */
- intel_prepare_ddi_buffers(dev, PORT_E, true);
- }
+ for (port = PORT_A; port < PORT_E; port++)
+ intel_prepare_ddi_buffers(dev, port, false);
+
+ /* DDI E is the suggested one to work in FDI mode, so program is as such
+ * by default. It will have to be re-programmed in case a digital DP
+ * output will be detected on it
+ */
+ intel_prepare_ddi_buffers(dev, PORT_E, true);
}
static const long hsw_ddi_buf_ctl_values[] = {
--
1.7.11.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: intel_prepare_ddi_buffers should be static
2012-11-23 17:30 [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: intel_prepare_ddi_buffers should be static Paulo Zanoni
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-11-23 17:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: only call intel_prepare_ddi if HAS_DDI Paulo Zanoni
@ 2012-11-29 13:39 ` Imre Deak
2012-11-29 13:59 ` Daniel Vetter
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Imre Deak @ 2012-11-29 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paulo Zanoni; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 15:30 -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
>
> It's not even declared on header files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
On the series:
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: intel_prepare_ddi_buffers should be static
2012-11-29 13:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: intel_prepare_ddi_buffers should be static Imre Deak
@ 2012-11-29 13:59 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2012-11-29 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Imre Deak; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 03:39:09PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 15:30 -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> >
> > It's not even declared on header files.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
>
> On the series:
> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Series queued for -next, thanks for the patches&review.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-29 13:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-11-23 17:30 [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: intel_prepare_ddi_buffers should be static Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-23 17:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: remove Haswell code from ironlake_fdi_pll_enable Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-23 17:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: add HAS_DDI check Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-23 17:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: only call intel_prepare_ddi if HAS_DDI Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-23 17:54 ` Chris Wilson
2012-11-23 18:46 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: invert the log inside intel_prepare_ddi Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-29 13:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: intel_prepare_ddi_buffers should be static Imre Deak
2012-11-29 13:59 ` Daniel Vetter
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.