From: "Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: "Chen, Alvin" <alvin.chen@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Kweh, Hock Leong" <hock.leong.kweh@intel.com>,
"sebastian@breakpoint.cc" <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@intel.com>,
"gnurou@gmail.com" <gnurou@gmail.com>,
"linus.walleij@linaro.org" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"grant.likely@linaro.org" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
"Westerberg, Mika" <mika.westerberg@intel.com>,
"dvhart@linux.intel.com" <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
"atull@opensource.altera.com" <atull@opensource.altera.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] GPIO: gpio-dwapb: Enable platform driver binding to MFD driver
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 12:02:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1409918522.30155.89.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4656BEB6164FC34F8171C6538F1A595B2E9829DA@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 10:20 +0000, Chen, Alvin wrote:
> > > - port->bgc.gc.ngpio = ngpio;
> > > - port->bgc.gc.of_node = port_np;
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
> >
> > Do we really need this #ifdef ?
> > of_node will be NULL anyway, or I missed something?
> Yes, otherwise, can't compile it. Please refer 'struct gpio_chip', 'gc.of_node' is in OF_GPIO micro also.
Ah, okay. Thus, it depends to Linus opinion, since I, for example, would
like to see this field present in the structure independently of
OF_GPIO.
>
> > > + if (pp->irq)
> >
> > irq == 0 is a valid hwirq (hardware irq) number. Yes, there is unlikely we have it
> > somewhere, but still it's possible. And yes, IRQ framework doesn't work with
> > virq == 0 (*virtual* irq), but accepts hwirq == 0. I recommend to use int type for
> > irq line number, and recognize negative value (usually -1) as no irq needed /
> > found.
> Understand. But if you refer the original code, you can see:
> irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> If (!irq) {
> ......
> return;
> }
> From above code, if irq=0, it indicates irq is not supported for OF devices. If we use '-1' to indicate irq is not supported. To make OF work, then our code should be:
Yes, like I said above. You introduce hw irq in the pdata, which could
be 0.
> irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> If (!irq) {
> pp->irq = -1;
> return;
> } else {
> pp->irq = irq;
> }
> Then the code looks strange.
>
> How do you think?
If I understood correctly you messed up with hwirq vs. virq.
Otherwise you have mention that you are using virq everywhere (I guess
you may rename the field in the structure), but in this case the field
in the platform_data looks a bit strange. Linus, what do you think?
P.S. Please, remove my Reviewed-by tag since code is changed enough.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Finland Oy
Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki
Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4
Domiciled in Helsinki
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: "Chen, Alvin" <alvin.chen@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Kweh, Hock Leong" <hock.leong.kweh@intel.com>,
"sebastian@breakpoint.cc" <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@intel.com>,
"gnurou@gmail.com" <gnurou@gmail.com>,
"linus.walleij@linaro.org" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"grant.likely@linaro.org" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
"Westerberg, Mika" <mika.westerberg@intel.com>,
"dvhart@linux.intel.com" <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
"atull@opensource.altera.com" <atull@opensource.altera.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] GPIO: gpio-dwapb: Enable platform driver binding to MFD driver
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 12:02:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1409918522.30155.89.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4656BEB6164FC34F8171C6538F1A595B2E9829DA@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 2469 bytes --]
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 10:20 +0000, Chen, Alvin wrote:
> > > - port->bgc.gc.ngpio = ngpio;
> > > - port->bgc.gc.of_node = port_np;
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
> >
> > Do we really need this #ifdef ?
> > of_node will be NULL anyway, or I missed something?
> Yes, otherwise, can't compile it. Please refer 'struct gpio_chip', 'gc.of_node' is in OF_GPIO micro also.
Ah, okay. Thus, it depends to Linus opinion, since I, for example, would
like to see this field present in the structure independently of
OF_GPIO.
>
> > > + if (pp->irq)
> >
> > irq == 0 is a valid hwirq (hardware irq) number. Yes, there is unlikely we have it
> > somewhere, but still it's possible. And yes, IRQ framework doesn't work with
> > virq == 0 (*virtual* irq), but accepts hwirq == 0. I recommend to use int type for
> > irq line number, and recognize negative value (usually -1) as no irq needed /
> > found.
> Understand. But if you refer the original code, you can see:
> irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> If (!irq) {
> ......
> return;
> }
> From above code, if irq=0, it indicates irq is not supported for OF devices. If we use '-1' to indicate irq is not supported. To make OF work, then our code should be:
Yes, like I said above. You introduce hw irq in the pdata, which could
be 0.
> irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> If (!irq) {
> pp->irq = -1;
> return;
> } else {
> pp->irq = irq;
> }
> Then the code looks strange.
>
> How do you think?
If I understood correctly you messed up with hwirq vs. virq.
Otherwise you have mention that you are using virq everywhere (I guess
you may rename the field in the structure), but in this case the field
in the platform_data looks a bit strange. Linus, what do you think?
P.S. Please, remove my Reviewed-by tag since code is changed enough.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Finland Oy
Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki
Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4
Domiciled in Helsinki
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-05 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-05 14:53 [PATCH 0/3 v2] The Designware GPIO Supporting Weike Chen
2014-09-05 14:53 ` [PATCH 1/3 v2] GPIO: gpio-dwapb: Enable platform driver binding to MFD driver Weike Chen
2014-09-05 9:21 ` Shevchenko, Andriy
2014-09-05 9:21 ` Shevchenko, Andriy
2014-09-05 10:20 ` Chen, Alvin
2014-09-05 10:20 ` Chen, Alvin
2014-09-05 12:02 ` Shevchenko, Andriy [this message]
2014-09-05 12:02 ` Shevchenko, Andriy
2014-09-05 12:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-09 1:50 ` Chen, Alvin
2014-09-09 9:01 ` Shevchenko, Andriy
2014-09-09 9:01 ` Shevchenko, Andriy
2014-09-05 11:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-05 19:37 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-09-06 10:47 ` Chen, Alvin
2014-09-09 1:20 ` Chen, Alvin
2014-09-05 14:53 ` [PATCH 2/3 v2] GPIO: gpio-dwapb: Support Debounce Weike Chen
2014-09-05 9:23 ` Shevchenko, Andriy
2014-09-05 9:23 ` Shevchenko, Andriy
2014-09-05 9:35 ` Chen, Alvin
2014-09-05 9:35 ` Chen, Alvin
2014-09-05 12:03 ` Shevchenko, Andriy
2014-09-05 12:03 ` Shevchenko, Andriy
2014-09-09 0:47 ` Chen, Alvin
2014-09-09 0:47 ` Chen, Alvin
2014-09-05 14:53 ` [PATCH 3/3 v2] GPIO: gpio-dwapb: Suspend & Resume PM enabling Weike Chen
2014-09-05 9:24 ` Shevchenko, Andriy
2014-09-05 9:24 ` Shevchenko, Andriy
2014-09-05 9:35 ` Chen, Alvin
2014-09-05 9:35 ` Chen, Alvin
2014-09-19 17:34 ` Linus Walleij
2014-09-22 1:37 ` Chen, Alvin
2014-09-22 1:37 ` Chen, Alvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1409918522.30155.89.camel@intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=alvin.chen@intel.com \
--cc=atull@opensource.altera.com \
--cc=boon.leong.ong@intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=hock.leong.kweh@intel.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@intel.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian@breakpoint.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.