Re: [PATCH OSSTEST v3 10/11] ts-xen-install: install Xen with XSM support if requested

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>]

On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 22:50 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
> ---
>  ts-xen-install |    4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/ts-xen-install b/ts-xen-install
> index 4d34d1f..2e2fcbc 100755
> --- a/ts-xen-install
> +++ b/ts-xen-install
> @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ if (@ARGV and $ARGV[0] eq '--check') {
>  
>  our $ho;
>  
> +my $enable_xsm = $r{enable_xsm} =~ m/y/ ? 1 : 0;
> +
>  my %distpath;
>  
>  sub packages () {
> @@ -171,7 +173,7 @@ sub setupboot () {
>      }
>  
>      my $want_kernver = get_runvar('kernel_ver',$r{'kernbuildjob'});
> -    debian_boot_setup($ho, $want_kernver, $xenhopt, \%distpath, \@hooks);
> +    debian_boot_setup($ho, $want_kernver, $enable_xsm, $xenhopt, \%distpath, \@hooks);

Doesn't this have to be in the same patch as the one which adds the new
parameter in the function declaration? Or at least that patch needs to
hardcode a false until now.

(not sure we care much about bisectability in osstest, Ian?)