All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	vz@mleia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: lpc32xx: Set PWM_PIN_LEVEL bit in lpc32xx_pwm_disable
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:26:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466601964.5316.19.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160622123222.GD26943@ulmo.ba.sec>

Hi Thierry,

On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 14:32 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:37:57PM -0400, Sylvain Lemieux wrote:
> > From: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux@tycoint.com>
> > 
> > If the PWM_PIN_LEVEL bit is setup to 1 in the bootloader, when the kernel
> > disable the PWM, the PWM output is always set as a logic 1.
> 
> I presume there's a reason why the bootloader set this bit to 1. Why do
> you assume it's the right thing to clear it?
> 
There is an alternative mode for the PWM output pin; using the 
PWM_PIN_LEVEL bit to control the PWM output (logical 0 or 1 on 
output) when the PWM is disable.

In this case, the bootloader is using the PWM_PIN_LEVEL bit
to control the PWM output (always 1) to enable the LCD; the 
application is using the PWM to control the intensity of the 
LCD output. When disabling the PWM, the line level should be 
setup to 0.

A version 2 of this patch will be send with support to select 
the alternate PWM disable level high from the device tree.

For details, you can refer to:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.pwm/3882/focus=508758


Sylvain

> Thierry

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: slemieux.tyco@gmail.com (Sylvain Lemieux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] pwm: lpc32xx: Set PWM_PIN_LEVEL bit in lpc32xx_pwm_disable
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:26:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466601964.5316.19.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160622123222.GD26943@ulmo.ba.sec>

Hi Thierry,

On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 14:32 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:37:57PM -0400, Sylvain Lemieux wrote:
> > From: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux@tycoint.com>
> > 
> > If the PWM_PIN_LEVEL bit is setup to 1 in the bootloader, when the kernel
> > disable the PWM, the PWM output is always set as a logic 1.
> 
> I presume there's a reason why the bootloader set this bit to 1. Why do
> you assume it's the right thing to clear it?
> 
There is an alternative mode for the PWM output pin; using the 
PWM_PIN_LEVEL bit to control the PWM output (logical 0 or 1 on 
output) when the PWM is disable.

In this case, the bootloader is using the PWM_PIN_LEVEL bit
to control the PWM output (always 1) to enable the LCD; the 
application is using the PWM to control the intensity of the 
LCD output. When disabling the PWM, the line level should be 
setup to 0.

A version 2 of this patch will be send with support to select 
the alternate PWM disable level high from the device tree.

For details, you can refer to:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.pwm/3882/focus=508758


Sylvain

> Thierry

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-22 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-03 19:37 [PATCH] pwm: lpc32xx: Set PWM_PIN_LEVEL bit in lpc32xx_pwm_disable Sylvain Lemieux
2016-06-03 19:37 ` Sylvain Lemieux
2016-06-21  2:11 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-06-21  2:11   ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-06-21 12:39   ` Sylvain Lemieux
2016-06-21 12:39     ` Sylvain Lemieux
2016-06-21 21:57     ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-06-21 21:57       ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-06-22 12:32 ` Thierry Reding
2016-06-22 12:32   ` Thierry Reding
2016-06-22 13:26   ` Sylvain Lemieux [this message]
2016-06-22 13:26     ` Sylvain Lemieux
2016-06-22 14:36     ` Thierry Reding
2016-06-22 14:36       ` Thierry Reding
2016-06-22 15:10       ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-06-22 15:10         ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-06-22 15:30         ` Sylvain Lemieux
2016-06-22 15:30           ` Sylvain Lemieux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1466601964.5316.19.camel@localhost \
    --to=slemieux.tyco@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=vz@mleia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.