All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com (Andy Shevchenko)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: dmatest no longer works on ARC SDP with DW DMAC
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:15:36 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470831336.4887.22.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470827209.21247.12.camel@synopsys.com>

On Wed, 2016-08-10@11:06 +0000, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> dmatest on ARC SDP with DW DMAC became broken after df5c7386
> ("dmaengine: dw: some Intel devices has no memcpy support") and
> 30cb2639 ("dmaengine: dw: don't override platform data with autocfg")
> commits.
> * After df5c7386 commit "DMA_MEMCPY" capability option doesn't
> get set correctly in platform driver version.
> * After 30cb2639 commit
> "data_width" and "nollp" parameters don't get set correctly in
> platform
> driver version.
> 
> This happens because in old driver version there are three sources?
> of parameters: pdata, device tree and autoconfig hardware registers.?
> Some parameters were read from pdata and others from autoconfig
> hardware registers. If pdata was absent some pdata structure?
> fields were filled with parameters from device tree. But 30cb2639
> commit disabled overriding pdata with autocfg, so if we use platform
> driver version without pdata some parameters will not be set.

Yes, that's correct behaviour right now. You have to provide platform
code which registers device with all platform data provided.

> I'm wondering what would be the best way to fix this situation?

Ideally we have to switch to use built-in device properties
(drivers/base/property.c) and platform code in your case has to provide
properties.

> Should we strictly read parameters from only one source (pdata/device
> tree/autoconfig) or we may mix some of them (for example getting
> missing data from autoconf regs)?

See above.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com>,
	"dmaengine@vger.kernel.org" <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "vinod.koul@intel.com" <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Vlad Zakharov <Vladislav.Zakharov@synopsys.com>,
	"linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>,
	Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>,
	Nelson Pereira <Nelson.Pereira@synopsys.com>,
	"viresh.kumar@linaro.org" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: dmatest no longer works on ARC SDP with DW DMAC
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:15:36 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470831336.4887.22.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470827209.21247.12.camel@synopsys.com>

On Wed, 2016-08-10 at 11:06 +0000, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> dmatest on ARC SDP with DW DMAC became broken after df5c7386
> ("dmaengine: dw: some Intel devices has no memcpy support") and
> 30cb2639 ("dmaengine: dw: don't override platform data with autocfg")
> commits.
> * After df5c7386 commit "DMA_MEMCPY" capability option doesn't
> get set correctly in platform driver version.
> * After 30cb2639 commit
> "data_width" and "nollp" parameters don't get set correctly in
> platform
> driver version.
> 
> This happens because in old driver version there are three sources 
> of parameters: pdata, device tree and autoconfig hardware registers. 
> Some parameters were read from pdata and others from autoconfig
> hardware registers. If pdata was absent some pdata structure 
> fields were filled with parameters from device tree. But 30cb2639
> commit disabled overriding pdata with autocfg, so if we use platform
> driver version without pdata some parameters will not be set.

Yes, that's correct behaviour right now. You have to provide platform
code which registers device with all platform data provided.

> I'm wondering what would be the best way to fix this situation?

Ideally we have to switch to use built-in device properties
(drivers/base/property.c) and platform code in your case has to provide
properties.

> Should we strictly read parameters from only one source (pdata/device
> tree/autoconfig) or we may mix some of them (for example getting
> missing data from autoconf regs)?

See above.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-10 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-10 11:06 dmatest no longer works on ARC SDP with DW DMAC Eugeniy Paltsev
2016-08-10 11:06 ` Eugeniy Paltsev
2016-08-10 12:15 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2016-08-10 12:15   ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-08-10 12:22   ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-08-10 12:22     ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-08-10 12:46     ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-08-10 12:46       ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1470831336.4887.22.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.