From: Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com (Alexey Brodkin)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: dmatest no longer works on ARC SDP with DW DMAC
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:22:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470831659.3428.23.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470831336.4887.22.camel@linux.intel.com>
Hi Andy,
On Wed, 2016-08-10@15:15 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-10@11:06 +0000, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> >
> > dmatest on ARC SDP with DW DMAC became broken after df5c7386
> > ("dmaengine: dw: some Intel devices has no memcpy support") and
> > 30cb2639 ("dmaengine: dw: don't override platform data with autocfg")
> > commits.
> > * After df5c7386 commit "DMA_MEMCPY" capability option doesn't
> > get set correctly in platform driver version.
> > * After 30cb2639 commit
> > "data_width" and "nollp" parameters don't get set correctly in
> > platform
> > driver version.
> >
> > This happens because in old driver version there are three sources?
> > of parameters: pdata, device tree and autoconfig hardware registers.?
> > Some parameters were read from pdata and others from autoconfig
> > hardware registers. If pdata was absent some pdata structure?
> > fields were filled with parameters from device tree. But 30cb2639
> > commit disabled overriding pdata with autocfg, so if we use platform
> > driver version without pdata some parameters will not be set.
>
> Yes, that's correct behaviour right now. You have to provide platform
> code which registers device with all platform data provided.
But given autocfg registers exist in HW why don't we rely on their contents?
> > I'm wondering what would be the best way to fix this situation?
>
> Ideally we have to switch to use built-in device properties
> (drivers/base/property.c) and platform code in your case has to provide
> properties.
What do you mean saying "built-in device properties"?
Setting pdata structure? In our particular case we use device tree
for DW DMAC setup.
-Alexey
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>
To: "andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "vinod.koul@intel.com" <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com" <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>,
"Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com" <Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com>,
"Nelson.Pereira@synopsys.com" <Nelson.Pereira@synopsys.com>,
"linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>,
"viresh.kumar@linaro.org" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"dmaengine@vger.kernel.org" <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dmatest no longer works on ARC SDP with DW DMAC
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:22:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470831659.3428.23.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470831336.4887.22.camel@linux.intel.com>
Hi Andy,
On Wed, 2016-08-10 at 15:15 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-10 at 11:06 +0000, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> >
> > dmatest on ARC SDP with DW DMAC became broken after df5c7386
> > ("dmaengine: dw: some Intel devices has no memcpy support") and
> > 30cb2639 ("dmaengine: dw: don't override platform data with autocfg")
> > commits.
> > * After df5c7386 commit "DMA_MEMCPY" capability option doesn't
> > get set correctly in platform driver version.
> > * After 30cb2639 commit
> > "data_width" and "nollp" parameters don't get set correctly in
> > platform
> > driver version.
> >
> > This happens because in old driver version there are three sources
> > of parameters: pdata, device tree and autoconfig hardware registers.
> > Some parameters were read from pdata and others from autoconfig
> > hardware registers. If pdata was absent some pdata structure
> > fields were filled with parameters from device tree. But 30cb2639
> > commit disabled overriding pdata with autocfg, so if we use platform
> > driver version without pdata some parameters will not be set.
>
> Yes, that's correct behaviour right now. You have to provide platform
> code which registers device with all platform data provided.
But given autocfg registers exist in HW why don't we rely on their contents?
> > I'm wondering what would be the best way to fix this situation?
>
> Ideally we have to switch to use built-in device properties
> (drivers/base/property.c) and platform code in your case has to provide
> properties.
What do you mean saying "built-in device properties"?
Setting pdata structure? In our particular case we use device tree
for DW DMAC setup.
-Alexey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-10 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-10 11:06 dmatest no longer works on ARC SDP with DW DMAC Eugeniy Paltsev
2016-08-10 11:06 ` Eugeniy Paltsev
2016-08-10 12:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-08-10 12:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-08-10 12:22 ` Alexey Brodkin [this message]
2016-08-10 12:22 ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-08-10 12:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-08-10 12:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1470831659.3428.23.camel@synopsys.com \
--to=alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.