From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>
To: "snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] dm rq: Avoid that request processing stalls sporadically
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:18:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491934715.2654.14.camel@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170411180358.GA19660@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 14:03 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Rather than working so hard to use DM code against me, your argument
> should be: "blk-mq drivers X, Y and Z rerun the hw queue; this is a well
> established pattern"
>
> I see drivers/nvme/host/fc.c:nvme_fc_start_fcp_op() does. But that is
> only one other driver out of ~20 BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_BUSY returns
> tree-wide.
>
> Could be there are some others, but hardly a well-established pattern.
Hello Mike,
Several blk-mq drivers that can return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_BUSY from their
.queue_rq() implementation stop the request queue (blk_mq_stop_hw_queue())
before returning "busy" and restart the queue after the busy condition has
been cleared (blk_mq_start_stopped_hw_queues()). Examples are virtio_blk and
xen-blkfront. However, this approach is not appropriate for the dm-mq core
nor for the scsi core since both drivers already use the "stopped" state for
another purpose than tracking whether or not a hardware queue is busy. Hence
the blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() and blk_mq_run_hw_queue() calls in these last
two drivers to rerun a hardware queue after the busy state has been cleared.
Bart.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>
To: "snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] dm rq: Avoid that request processing stalls sporadically
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:18:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491934715.2654.14.camel@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170411180358.GA19660@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 14:03 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Rather than working so hard to use DM code against me, your argument
> should be: "blk-mq drivers X, Y and Z rerun the hw queue; this is a well
> established pattern"
>=20
> I see drivers/nvme/host/fc.c:nvme_fc_start_fcp_op() does. But that is
> only one other driver out of ~20 BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_BUSY returns
> tree-wide.
>=20
> Could be there are some others, but hardly a well-established pattern.
Hello Mike,
Several blk-mq drivers that can return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_BUSY from their
.queue_rq() implementation stop the request queue=A0(blk_mq_stop_hw_queue()=
)
before returning "busy" and restart the queue after the busy condition has
been cleared (blk_mq_start_stopped_hw_queues()). Examples are virtio_blk an=
d
xen-blkfront. However, this approach is not appropriate for the dm-mq core
nor for the scsi core since both drivers already use the "stopped" state fo=
r
another purpose than tracking whether or not a hardware queue is busy. Henc=
e
the blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() and blk_mq_run_hw_queue() calls in these la=
st
two drivers to rerun a hardware queue after the busy state has been cleared=
.
Bart.=
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-11 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-07 18:16 [PATCH v4 0/6] Avoid that scsi-mq and dm-mq queue processing stalls sporadically Bart Van Assche
2017-04-07 18:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-07 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] blk-mq: Make it safe to use RCU to iterate over blk_mq_tag_set.tag_list Bart Van Assche
2017-04-07 18:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-10 7:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-07 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] blk-mq: Restart a single queue if tag sets are shared Bart Van Assche
2017-04-07 18:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-10 7:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-07 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] blk-mq: Clarify comments in blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list() Bart Van Assche
2017-04-07 18:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-10 7:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-07 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] blk-mq: Introduce blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() Bart Van Assche
2017-04-07 18:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-10 7:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-10 15:02 ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-07 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] scsi: Avoid that SCSI queues get stuck Bart Van Assche
2017-04-07 18:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-10 7:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-07 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] dm rq: Avoid that request processing stalls sporadically Bart Van Assche
2017-04-07 18:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-11 16:09 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-04-11 16:09 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-04-11 16:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-11 16:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-11 17:47 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-04-11 17:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-11 17:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-11 18:03 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-04-11 18:03 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-04-11 18:18 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-04-11 18:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-12 3:42 ` Ming Lei
2017-04-12 3:42 ` Ming Lei
2017-04-12 18:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-12 18:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-12 18:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-13 2:20 ` Ming Lei
2017-04-13 2:20 ` Ming Lei
2017-04-13 16:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-14 1:13 ` Ming Lei
2017-04-14 17:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-14 17:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-16 10:21 ` Ming Lei
2017-04-07 18:23 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] Avoid that scsi-mq and dm-mq queue " Jens Axboe
2017-04-07 18:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-07 18:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-07 18:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-07 18:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-07 18:51 ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-12 10:55 ` Benjamin Block
2017-04-12 10:55 ` Benjamin Block
2017-04-12 18:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-12 18:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-13 12:23 ` Benjamin Block
2017-04-13 12:23 ` Benjamin Block
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1491934715.2654.14.camel@sandisk.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.