All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@gmail.com>
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: journal size reiserfs vs reiser4
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 11:29:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <194f6255050904022932ca34ea@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <431A6E71.4060105@namesys.com>

Well, it sounds a bit like a microsoft manager explaining why XP-Home
has no terminal server features ;-)

I think an mkfs-option would be best, with a warning if the value
given by the user is nonsence (3-8% ok?).
On the contrary a 500GB hard drive with normal files on it would not
benefit too much just because 25GB are free?

lg Clemens

> This is a bit arrogant, but I believe that a user that does not know how
> to recompile the kernel with the #define changed is not sophisticated
> enough to know how much he is going to hurt his performance by going
> from 95% to 99% space used, and a user who does not want to bother with
> recompiling is not going to study the topic enough to realize he is
> making a mistake 80% of the time.  It is important to know when
> designing a product when your users intuitions are going to be wrong
> 80%of the time, and while one should always be slow to reach such a
> conclusion, I think this is such a case.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-04  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-01 11:46 journal size reiserfs vs reiser4 Thomas Kuther
2005-09-01 12:48 ` Thomas Kuther
2005-09-01 12:53   ` Vladimir V. Saveliev
2005-09-01 13:03     ` PFC
2005-09-01 13:12       ` Thomas Kuther
2005-09-01 13:05     ` Thomas Kuther
2005-09-01 13:07       ` Peter Staubach
2005-09-01 13:37         ` Vladimir V. Saveliev
2005-09-01 15:25         ` Hans Reiser
2005-09-01 16:06           ` Peter Staubach
2005-09-01 16:23             ` Marcel Hilzinger
2005-09-01 17:03             ` David Masover
2005-09-01 17:27               ` Hans Reiser
2005-09-01 17:36                 ` Peter Staubach
2005-09-01 17:59                   ` Hans Reiser
2005-09-01 18:14                     ` Peter Staubach
2005-09-01 22:17             ` Hans Reiser
2005-09-02  2:28             ` michael chang
2005-09-02  6:34               ` Vladimir V. Saveliev
2005-09-02  7:19                 ` Hans Reiser
2005-09-02  7:39                   ` PFC
2005-09-02 16:02                     ` michael chang
2005-09-02 17:37                   ` Łukasz Mierzwa
2005-09-02 18:08                     ` Gregory Maxwell
2005-09-02 21:29                   ` Matt Stegman
2005-09-04  1:04                     ` michael chang
2005-09-04  2:38                       ` David Masover
2005-09-04  3:48                         ` Hans Reiser
2005-09-04  9:29                           ` Clemens Eisserer [this message]
2005-09-04 16:42                             ` David Masover
2005-09-05 12:16                               ` michael chang
2005-09-05 18:20                                 ` David Masover
2005-09-05 21:24                                   ` michael chang
2005-09-06 13:59                           ` Tom Vier
2005-09-06 20:32                             ` michael chang
2005-09-06 20:45                               ` David Masover
2005-09-06 20:47                                 ` michael chang
2005-09-06 21:03                                   ` David Masover
2005-09-06 23:10                               ` Hans Reiser
2005-09-07  2:48                                 ` Gregory Maxwell
2005-09-07 23:58                                   ` reiser4 merge status Hans Reiser
2005-09-08  0:08                                     ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-06 20:36                             ` journal size reiserfs vs reiser4 Gregory Maxwell
2005-09-06 20:41                               ` michael chang
2005-09-07 14:01                               ` Tom Vier
2005-09-07 20:18                                 ` michael chang
2005-09-05 12:14                       ` michael chang
2005-09-03 10:08           ` Sander
2005-09-03 11:34             ` Pierre Etchemaïté
2005-09-04  0:15             ` Hans Reiser
2005-09-01 13:13       ` Marcel Hilzinger
2005-09-01 13:15         ` Thomas Kuther
2005-09-01 14:08           ` michael chang
2005-09-01 13:13       ` Lexington Luthor
2005-09-01 13:28         ` Thomas Kuther

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=194f6255050904022932ca34ea@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=linuxhippy@gmail.com \
    --cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.