From: PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com>
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: journal size reiserfs vs reiser4
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 09:39:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.swgsv3zxth1vuj@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4317FD1B.504@namesys.com>
> It could probably be a lot less than 5%, 2% is more than enough I would
> guess, but we also need to reserve space to get good performance.
I'm more than happy to lose 3 GB on my 60 gb / 5400 rpm crap laptop
drive and have reiser4 transform it into something that feels more like a
big f*king raptor. Everytime I boot into Windows I feel the burning pain
of this crap drive combined with the cancer of NTFS. Uh-oh this file takes
long to load OH CRAP it's fragmented in 20000 bits (my personal record !).
Gee. Gotta. Defrag. Again.
Note that on your average Linux system with a zillion of small files the
efficient reiser4 packing will save a lot of space.
Un-tar the freedb database on a NTFS (or EXT3) partition and witness how
your machine dies, then stop complaining about reiser4 eating 5% of your
space dammit.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-02 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-01 11:46 journal size reiserfs vs reiser4 Thomas Kuther
2005-09-01 12:48 ` Thomas Kuther
2005-09-01 12:53 ` Vladimir V. Saveliev
2005-09-01 13:03 ` PFC
2005-09-01 13:12 ` Thomas Kuther
2005-09-01 13:05 ` Thomas Kuther
2005-09-01 13:07 ` Peter Staubach
2005-09-01 13:37 ` Vladimir V. Saveliev
2005-09-01 15:25 ` Hans Reiser
2005-09-01 16:06 ` Peter Staubach
2005-09-01 16:23 ` Marcel Hilzinger
2005-09-01 17:03 ` David Masover
2005-09-01 17:27 ` Hans Reiser
2005-09-01 17:36 ` Peter Staubach
2005-09-01 17:59 ` Hans Reiser
2005-09-01 18:14 ` Peter Staubach
2005-09-01 22:17 ` Hans Reiser
2005-09-02 2:28 ` michael chang
2005-09-02 6:34 ` Vladimir V. Saveliev
2005-09-02 7:19 ` Hans Reiser
2005-09-02 7:39 ` PFC [this message]
2005-09-02 16:02 ` michael chang
2005-09-02 17:37 ` Łukasz Mierzwa
2005-09-02 18:08 ` Gregory Maxwell
2005-09-02 21:29 ` Matt Stegman
2005-09-04 1:04 ` michael chang
2005-09-04 2:38 ` David Masover
2005-09-04 3:48 ` Hans Reiser
2005-09-04 9:29 ` Clemens Eisserer
2005-09-04 16:42 ` David Masover
2005-09-05 12:16 ` michael chang
2005-09-05 18:20 ` David Masover
2005-09-05 21:24 ` michael chang
2005-09-06 13:59 ` Tom Vier
2005-09-06 20:32 ` michael chang
2005-09-06 20:45 ` David Masover
2005-09-06 20:47 ` michael chang
2005-09-06 21:03 ` David Masover
2005-09-06 23:10 ` Hans Reiser
2005-09-07 2:48 ` Gregory Maxwell
2005-09-07 23:58 ` reiser4 merge status Hans Reiser
2005-09-08 0:08 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-06 20:36 ` journal size reiserfs vs reiser4 Gregory Maxwell
2005-09-06 20:41 ` michael chang
2005-09-07 14:01 ` Tom Vier
2005-09-07 20:18 ` michael chang
2005-09-05 12:14 ` michael chang
2005-09-03 10:08 ` Sander
2005-09-03 11:34 ` Pierre Etchemaïté
2005-09-04 0:15 ` Hans Reiser
2005-09-01 13:13 ` Marcel Hilzinger
2005-09-01 13:15 ` Thomas Kuther
2005-09-01 14:08 ` michael chang
2005-09-01 13:13 ` Lexington Luthor
2005-09-01 13:28 ` Thomas Kuther
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=op.swgsv3zxth1vuj@localhost \
--to=lists@boutiquenumerique.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.