From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Duncan Sands <baldrick@wanadoo.fr>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUGed to death
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:17:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030415131716.GA814@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304151453320.12110-100000@serv>
On Tue, Apr 15 2003, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> > > What happens if you just turn BUG_ON into "do {} while (0)"?
> >
> > If you do that, you must audit every single BUG_ON to make sure the
> > expression doesn't have any side effects.
> >
> > BUG_ON(do_the_good_stuff());
>
> This should avoid the problem:
>
> #define BUG_ON(cond) do { if (cond); } while (0)
Yes I'm aware of the problem being fixable, the above is not likely to
be fast than BUG_ON(). My point was just that you cannot simply count on
being able to make BUG_ON a noop, some thought has to go into it.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-15 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-14 20:19 BUGed to death Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-14 20:40 ` Duncan Sands
2003-04-14 21:02 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-14 21:10 ` Duncan Sands
2003-04-14 21:17 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-15 11:57 ` Duncan Sands
2003-04-15 12:05 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-15 14:39 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-23 15:08 ` Duncan Sands
2003-04-14 21:00 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-14 20:55 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-14 21:08 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-14 21:50 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-14 21:55 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-15 0:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-15 12:01 ` Duncan Sands
2003-04-15 12:31 ` Jens Axboe
2003-04-15 12:36 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-15 12:40 ` Jens Axboe
2003-04-15 12:49 ` Sean Neakums
2003-04-15 12:52 ` Sean Neakums
2003-04-15 13:01 ` Roman Zippel
2003-04-15 13:17 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2003-04-15 13:55 ` Duncan Sands
2003-04-15 14:22 ` Jens Axboe
2003-04-15 14:35 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-15 14:39 ` Duncan Sands
2003-04-15 14:45 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-15 14:58 ` Duncan Sands
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-15 14:30 rwhron
2003-04-15 15:57 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-15 16:11 ` Nick Piggin
2003-04-15 16:22 ` Soeren Sonnenburg
2003-04-15 16:42 ` Michael Buesch
2003-04-15 16:45 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-15 18:33 Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030415131716.GA814@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=baldrick@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.