* [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) do_page_fault?
@ 2003-10-10 22:17 Joel Soete
2003-10-12 18:16 ` Carlos O'Donell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Joel Soete @ 2003-10-10 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: parisc-linux
Hi all,
The new evolution crash on my c110 [debian unstable] (even though I test
successfully a previous release on my b2k) with a kernel 2.6test7pa5.
do_page_fault() pid=3917 command='evolution' type=7 address=0x413627db
vm_start = 0x41332000, vm_end = 0x413b3000
YZrvWESTHLNXBCVMcbcbcbcbOGFRQPDI
PSW: 00000000000001101111111100001111 Not tainted
r00-03 00000000 413c6bf0 41383947 00690d80
r04-07 413c7bf0 00000000 00000001 00000000
r08-11 0000000c 0030c7a8 41288844 0000007e
r12-15 001c622c 002d7830 000009e4 0013a078
r16-19 08000000 faf03260 0000003a 413c7bf0
r20-23 00154d1c 413627c0 00154c90 00002007
r24-27 00101006 00154c90 00690d80 000c1478
r28-31 00000001 00000019 faf03980 4185c657
sr0-3 00000000 00000088 00000000 00000088
sr4-7 00000088 00000088 00000088 00000088
IASQ: 00000088 00000088 IAOQ: 413627db 413627df
IIR: 687c0048 ISR: 00000088 IOR: 00690da4
CPU: 0 CR30: 10bd4000 CR31: 103cb000
ORIG_R28: 41a130a0
IAOQ[0]: 0x413627db
IAOQ[1]: 0x413627df
RP(r2): 0x41383947
_______________________________
< Your System ate a SPARC! Gah! >
-------------------------------
\ ^__^
\ (xx)\_______
(__)\ )\/\
U ||----w |
|| ||
I put the question because very surprised by this message?
Thanks for advise,
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread* Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) do_page_fault? 2003-10-10 22:17 [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) do_page_fault? Joel Soete @ 2003-10-12 18:16 ` Carlos O'Donell 2003-10-12 18:42 ` Joel Soete 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Carlos O'Donell @ 2003-10-12 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joel Soete; +Cc: parisc-linux On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 10:17:00PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: > Hi all, > > The new evolution crash on my c110 [debian unstable] (even though I test > successfully a previous release on my b2k) with a kernel 2.6test7pa5. > > do_page_fault() pid=3917 command='evolution' type=7 address=0x413627db > vm_start = 0x41332000, vm_end = 0x413b3000 > Run it through a debugger. Try to find out what was at this address? c. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) do_page_fault? 2003-10-12 18:16 ` Carlos O'Donell @ 2003-10-12 18:42 ` Joel Soete 2003-10-12 20:02 ` Carlos O'Donell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Joel Soete @ 2003-10-12 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carlos O'Donell; +Cc: parisc-linux Hello Carlos, I launch 'gbd evolution' (gdb) run to determine the new address in this env but failed before with message: Program received signal SIG37, Real-time event 37. 0x4193c574 in malloc_set_state () from /lib/libc.so.6 what's your opinion? Joel Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 10:17:00PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>The new evolution crash on my c110 [debian unstable] (even though I test >>successfully a previous release on my b2k) with a kernel 2.6test7pa5. >> >>do_page_fault() pid=3917 command='evolution' type=7 address=0x413627db >>vm_start = 0x41332000, vm_end = 0x413b3000 >> > > > Run it through a debugger. Try to find out what was at this address? > > c. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) do_page_fault? 2003-10-12 18:42 ` Joel Soete @ 2003-10-12 20:02 ` Carlos O'Donell 2003-10-13 11:44 ` Joel Soete 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Carlos O'Donell @ 2003-10-12 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joel Soete; +Cc: parisc-linux On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 06:42:55PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: > Hello Carlos, > > I launch 'gbd evolution' > (gdb) run > to determine the new address in this env but failed before with message: > Program received signal SIG37, Real-time event 37. > 0x4193c574 in malloc_set_state () from /lib/libc.so.6 > > what's your opinion? That's libpthreads realtime singal mechanism working. You need to set "handle all nostop" and "handle all pass" in gdb. Then you can do the math with /proc/<pid>/maps and the dying address to calculate the _real_ library offset and function symbolic name. c. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) do_page_fault? 2003-10-12 20:02 ` Carlos O'Donell @ 2003-10-13 11:44 ` Joel Soete 2003-10-18 21:13 ` Joel Soete 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Joel Soete @ 2003-10-13 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carlos O'Donell; +Cc: parisc-linux Hi Carlos, I just haven't such hw at my office where otc i can do some other check on the b2k model. On this b2k (also installed with unstable debian) run fine the same release of evolution (otc what i said). But it is booted with last 2.4 (a merge of 23-pre7 and 22-pa12) with 256M of ram (only 128k for c110) and without mozilla-psm (a recommended or suggested additional pkg added on c110). So a lot of test to figure out the present pb :) Thanks a lot ( I will advise you :) ) Joel >-- Original Message -- >From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca> >To: Joel Soete <soete.joel@tiscali.be> >Cc: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org >Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 16:02:02 -0400 >Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) do_page_fault? > > >On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 06:42:55PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: > Hello Carlos, > > I launch 'gbd evolution' > (gdb) run > to determine the new address in this env but failed before with message: > Program received signal SIG37, Real-time event 37. >> 0x4193c574 in malloc_set_state () from /lib/libc.so.6 > > what's your opinion? That's libpthreads realtime singal mechanism working. You need to set "handle all nostop" and "handle all pass" in gdb. Then you can do the math with /proc/<pid> >maps and the dying address to calculate the _real_ library offset and function symbolic name. c. _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman >listinfo/parisc-linux ------------------------------------------------------------------------- L'Internet rapide, c'est pour tout le monde. Tiscali ADSL, 19,50 Euro pendant 3 mois! http://reg.tiscali.be/default.asp?lg=fr ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) do_page_fault? 2003-10-13 11:44 ` Joel Soete @ 2003-10-18 21:13 ` Joel Soete 2003-10-19 15:28 ` Joel Soete 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Joel Soete @ 2003-10-18 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joel Soete; +Cc: Carlos O'Donell, parisc-linux Carlos, I just reboot my C110 but with a kernel 2.4.21-32 and evolution works fine. OTC with k2.6 still failled. I will try to see later what is wrong :( Thanks again, Joel Joel Soete wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > I just haven't such hw at my office where otc i can do some other check on > the b2k model. > > On this b2k (also installed with unstable debian) run fine the same release > of evolution (otc what i said). > But it is booted with last 2.4 (a merge of 23-pre7 and 22-pa12) with 256M > of ram (only 128k for c110) and without mozilla-psm (a recommended or suggested > additional pkg added on c110). > > So a lot of test to figure out the present pb :) > > Thanks a lot ( I will advise you :) ) > Joel > > >>-- Original Message -- >>From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca> >>To: Joel Soete <soete.joel@tiscali.be> >>Cc: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org >>Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 16:02:02 -0400 >>Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) do_page_fault? >> >> >>On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 06:42:55PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: >>Hello Carlos, >> >>I launch 'gbd evolution' >>(gdb) run >>to determine the new address in this env but failed before with message: >>Program received signal SIG37, Real-time event 37. > > >>>0x4193c574 in malloc_set_state () from /lib/libc.so.6 >> >>what's your opinion? > > > That's libpthreads realtime singal mechanism working. > You need to set "handle all nostop" and "handle all pass" in gdb. > > Then you can do the math with /proc/<pid> > >>maps and the dying address to > > calculate the _real_ library offset and function symbolic name. > > c. > _______________________________________________ > parisc-linux mailing list > parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org > http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman > >>listinfo/parisc-linux > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > L'Internet rapide, c'est pour tout le monde. Tiscali ADSL, 19,50 Euro > pendant 3 mois! http://reg.tiscali.be/default.asp?lg=fr > > > _______________________________________________ > parisc-linux mailing list > parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org > http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) do_page_fault? 2003-10-18 21:13 ` Joel Soete @ 2003-10-19 15:28 ` Joel Soete 2003-10-19 19:49 ` [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] Joel Soete 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Joel Soete @ 2003-10-19 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joel Soete; +Cc: Carlos O'Donell, parisc-linux Too bad, The pb re-occurs also with 2.4.21-32 but this time during two kernels (2.4.22 && 2.6) was build at the same time. When 2.6 was finished, I can re-launch evolution without pb. Could it be a pb of swap? How may check if its limits were reach at this moment? Thanks, Joel Joel Soete wrote: > Carlos, > > I just reboot my C110 but with a kernel 2.4.21-32 and evolution works > fine. OTC with k2.6 still failled. I will try to see later what is wrong :( > > Thanks again, > Joel > > > Joel Soete wrote: > >> Hi Carlos, >> >> I just haven't such hw at my office where otc i can do some other >> check on >> the b2k model. >> >> On this b2k (also installed with unstable debian) run fine the same >> release >> of evolution (otc what i said). >> But it is booted with last 2.4 (a merge of 23-pre7 and 22-pa12) with 256M >> of ram (only 128k for c110) and without mozilla-psm (a recommended or >> suggested >> additional pkg added on c110). >> >> So a lot of test to figure out the present pb :) >> >> Thanks a lot ( I will advise you :) ) >> Joel >> >> >>> -- Original Message -- >>> From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca> >>> To: Joel Soete <soete.joel@tiscali.be> >>> Cc: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org >>> Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 16:02:02 -0400 >>> Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) do_page_fault? >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 06:42:55PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: >>> Hello Carlos, >>> >>> I launch 'gbd evolution' >>> (gdb) run >>> to determine the new address in this env but failed before with message: >>> Program received signal SIG37, Real-time event 37. >> >> >> >>>> 0x4193c574 in malloc_set_state () from /lib/libc.so.6 >>> >>> >>> what's your opinion? >> >> >> >> That's libpthreads realtime singal mechanism working. >> You need to set "handle all nostop" and "handle all pass" in gdb. >> >> Then you can do the math with /proc/<pid> >> >>> maps and the dying address to >> >> >> calculate the _real_ library offset and function symbolic name. >> >> c. >> _______________________________________________ >> parisc-linux mailing list >> parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org >> http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman >> >>> listinfo/parisc-linux >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> L'Internet rapide, c'est pour tout le monde. Tiscali ADSL, 19,50 Euro >> pendant 3 mois! http://reg.tiscali.be/default.asp?lg=fr >> >> _______________________________________________ >> parisc-linux mailing list >> parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org >> http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux >> > > > _______________________________________________ > parisc-linux mailing list > parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org > http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] 2003-10-19 15:28 ` Joel Soete @ 2003-10-19 19:49 ` Joel Soete 2003-10-19 23:10 ` Carlos O'Donell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Joel Soete @ 2003-10-19 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joel Soete; +Cc: Carlos O'Donell, parisc-linux Hi pa, Please apologies, I forget to mentioned an important matter: with 2.6.0-test-pa1 it is not anymore a do_page_fault() but: evolution (pid 2454): Protection id trap (code 27) YZrvWESTHLNXBCVMcbcbcbcbOGFRQPDI PSW: 00000000000001000000000000001111 Not tainted r00-03 00000000 ffffff9c 1016fadc 15207b60 r04-07 00000001 0027f220 000000c9 15207b60 r08-11 00000000 0027f228 00000001 fffffff2 r12-15 418db608 418db718 418215a8 418215a8 r16-19 418db608 418215a8 00000070 00000000 r20-23 00000001 00000002 0027f226 15207b6e r24-27 00000000 00000001 16253f60 10374010 r28-31 00000000 00000005 16028140 1016f8c0 sr0-3 00000000 00000050 00000000 00000050 sr4-7 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 IASQ: 00000000 00000000 IAOQ: 1016fbac 1016fbb0 IIR: 0ed3d240 ISR: 00000050 IOR: 0027f226 CPU: 0 CR30: 16028000 CR31: 103cd000 ORIG_R28: 418215a8 IAOQ[0]: sys_poll+0x1f4/0x214 IAOQ[1]: sys_poll+0x1f8/0x214 RP(r2): sys_poll+0x124/0x214 as well as for 2.4: evolution (pid 1045): Protection id trap (code 27) YZrvWESTHLNXBCVMcbcbcbcbOGFRQPDI PSW: 00000000000011101111111100001111 Not tainted r00-03 00000000 00000000 1010e01c 12b1f244 r04-07 faf02700 15310268 00000000 12b1f244 r08-11 00000000 15310460 faf02710 0000000b r12-15 00000000 418db718 418db608 00142980 r16-19 15310268 faf01e20 00000022 00000000 r20-23 00000000 000000b0 00000001 15310460 r24-27 0000007f 15310509 faf02710 10330010 r28-31 0000000b 00000001 15310740 10136da4 sr0-3 00000088 00000088 00000000 00000088 sr4-7 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 IASQ: 00000000 00000000 IAOQ: 102ec738 102ec730 IIR: 0f415222 ISR: 00000088 IOR: faf02710 CPU: 0 CR30: 15310000 CR31: 103d8000 ORIG_R28: 00000000 Sorry, Joel Joel Soete wrote: > Too bad, > > The pb re-occurs also with 2.4.21-32 but this time during two kernels > (2.4.22 && 2.6) was build at the same time. When 2.6 was finished, I can > re-launch evolution without pb. Could it be a pb of swap? How may check > if its limits were reach at this moment? > > Thanks, > Joel > > > Joel Soete wrote: > >> Carlos, >> >> I just reboot my C110 but with a kernel 2.4.21-32 and evolution works >> fine. OTC with k2.6 still failled. I will try to see later what is >> wrong :( >> >> Thanks again, >> Joel >> >> >> Joel Soete wrote: >> >>> Hi Carlos, >>> >>> I just haven't such hw at my office where otc i can do some other >>> check on >>> the b2k model. >>> >>> On this b2k (also installed with unstable debian) run fine the same >>> release >>> of evolution (otc what i said). >>> But it is booted with last 2.4 (a merge of 23-pre7 and 22-pa12) with >>> 256M >>> of ram (only 128k for c110) and without mozilla-psm (a recommended or >>> suggested >>> additional pkg added on c110). >>> >>> So a lot of test to figure out the present pb :) >>> >>> Thanks a lot ( I will advise you :) ) >>> Joel >>> >>> >>>> -- Original Message -- >>>> From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca> >>>> To: Joel Soete <soete.joel@tiscali.be> >>>> Cc: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org >>>> Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 16:02:02 -0400 >>>> Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) do_page_fault? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 06:42:55PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: >>>> Hello Carlos, >>>> >>>> I launch 'gbd evolution' >>>> (gdb) run >>>> to determine the new address in this env but failed before with >>>> message: >>>> Program received signal SIG37, Real-time event 37. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>> 0x4193c574 in malloc_set_state () from /lib/libc.so.6 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> what's your opinion? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> That's libpthreads realtime singal mechanism working. >>> You need to set "handle all nostop" and "handle all pass" in gdb. >>> >>> Then you can do the math with /proc/<pid> >>> >>>> maps and the dying address to >>> >>> >>> >>> calculate the _real_ library offset and function symbolic name. >>> >>> c. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> parisc-linux mailing list >>> parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org >>> http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman >>> >>>> listinfo/parisc-linux >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> L'Internet rapide, c'est pour tout le monde. Tiscali ADSL, 19,50 Euro >>> pendant 3 mois! http://reg.tiscali.be/default.asp?lg=fr >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> parisc-linux mailing list >>> parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org >>> http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> parisc-linux mailing list >> parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org >> http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux >> > > _______________________________________________ > parisc-linux mailing list > parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org > http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] 2003-10-19 19:49 ` [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] Joel Soete @ 2003-10-19 23:10 ` Carlos O'Donell 2003-10-21 6:24 ` Joel Soete 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Carlos O'Donell @ 2003-10-19 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joel Soete; +Cc: parisc-linux On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 07:49:08PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: > Hi pa, > > Please apologies, I forget to mentioned an important matter: > with 2.6.0-test-pa1 it is not anymore a do_page_fault() but: > evolution (pid 2454): Protection id trap (code 27) Do not wrap lines like this. > YZrvWESTHLNXBCVMcbcbcbcbOGFRQPDI > PSW: 00000000000001000000000000001111 Not > tainted r00-03 You should really run evolution through gdb. Remember to use "handle all nostop" and "handle all pass". c. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] 2003-10-19 23:10 ` Carlos O'Donell @ 2003-10-21 6:24 ` Joel Soete 2003-11-01 23:27 ` Joel Soete 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Joel Soete @ 2003-10-21 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carlos O'Donell; +Cc: parisc-linux Hi Carlos, Sorry, for bad wrap (in fact cut and past behaviour was different is the src is xterm or a minicom, and I don't pay attention: my bad). Sorry also if the 'original message' below was so badly inserted, but my isp support couldn't help me to fix this pb :( Finaly, I would also like to trace this pb with gdb but this c110 is a bit slow and requested many time to compile another kernel to allow me to compare 2.4 and 2.6 behaviour :(. I would so try next week-end. Thanks for your understand, Joel >-- Original Message -- >From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca> >To: Joel Soete <soete.joel@tiscali.be> >Cc: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org >Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 19:10:15 -0400 >Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: >do_page_fault?] > > >On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 07:49:08PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: > Hi pa, > > Please apologies, I forget to mentioned an important matter: > with 2.6.0-test-pa1 it is not anymore a do_page_fault() but: > evolution (pid 2454): Protection id trap (code >7) Do not wrap lines like this. > YZrvWESTHLNXBCVMcbcbcbcbOGFRQPDI > PSW: 00000000000001000000000000001111 Not > tainted r00-03 You should really run evol >tion through gdb. Remember to use "handle all nostop" and "handle all pass". c. _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc- >inux ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tiscali ADSL: 3 mois GRATUITS! L'Internet rapide, c'est pour tout le monde. http://reg.tiscali.be/default.asp?lg=fr ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] 2003-10-21 6:24 ` Joel Soete @ 2003-11-01 23:27 ` Joel Soete 2003-11-02 20:22 ` Carlos O'Donell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Joel Soete @ 2003-11-01 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carlos O'Donell; +Cc: parisc-linux Hi Carlos, I don't understand anymore anything. This afternoon i recompile k 2.4.23-pre9-pa13 + Randolph patch to test it. (Ok) So I launch evolution which crash at the same place as usual. After the diner I restart this c110 with this new kernel but this time, no more "do_page_fault() pid=805 command='evolution' type=7". I restart it severall time no means to reproduce anymore :( Joel On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 06:24, Joel Soete wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > Sorry, for bad wrap (in fact cut and past behaviour was different is the > src is xterm or a minicom, and I don't pay attention: my bad). > > Sorry also if the 'original message' below was so badly inserted, but my > isp support couldn't help me to fix this pb :( > > Finaly, I would also like to trace this pb with gdb but this c110 is a bit > slow and requested many time to compile another kernel to allow me to compare > 2.4 and 2.6 behaviour :(. I would so try next week-end. > > Thanks for your understand, > Joel > > >-- Original Message -- > >From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca> > >To: Joel Soete <soete.joel@tiscali.be> > >Cc: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org > >Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 19:10:15 -0400 > >Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: > >do_page_fault?] > > > > > >On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 07:49:08PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: > > Hi pa, > > > > Please apologies, I forget to mentioned an important matter: > > with 2.6.0-test-pa1 it is not anymore a do_page_fault() but: > > evolution (pid 2454): Protection id trap (code > >7) > > Do not wrap lines like this. > > > YZrvWESTHLNXBCVMcbcbcbcbOGFRQPDI > > PSW: 00000000000001000000000000001111 Not > > tainted r00-03 > > You should really run evol > >tion through gdb. Remember to use "handle all > nostop" and "handle all pass". > > c. > _______________________________________________ > parisc-linux mailing list > parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org > http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc- > >inux > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tiscali ADSL: 3 mois GRATUITS! L'Internet rapide, c'est pour tout le monde. > > http://reg.tiscali.be/default.asp?lg=fr > > > _______________________________________________ > parisc-linux mailing list > parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org > http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] 2003-11-01 23:27 ` Joel Soete @ 2003-11-02 20:22 ` Carlos O'Donell 2003-11-03 9:11 ` Joel Soete 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Carlos O'Donell @ 2003-11-02 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joel Soete; +Cc: parisc-linux On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 11:27:20PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > I don't understand anymore anything. > > This afternoon i recompile k 2.4.23-pre9-pa13 + Randolph patch to test > it. (Ok) > > So I launch evolution which crash at the same place as usual. > > After the diner I restart this c110 with this new kernel but this time, > no more "do_page_fault() pid=805 command='evolution' type=7". I restart > it severall time no means to reproduce anymore :( So it doesn't crash anymore? :) c. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] 2003-11-02 20:22 ` Carlos O'Donell @ 2003-11-03 9:11 ` Joel Soete 2003-11-08 12:46 ` Joel Soete 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Joel Soete @ 2003-11-03 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carlos O'Donell; +Cc: parisc-linux Carlos, Yes it didn't crash anymore :) But I didn't have more opportunity to reboot severall time this c110 to make more test (the only difference between the two previous one: the first was a reboot, the second was a boot? and absolutley no other changes). Cheers, Joel >-- Original Message -- >From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca> >To: Joel Soete <soete.joel@tiscali.be> >Cc: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org >Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 15:22:28 -0500 >Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: >do_page_fault?] > > >On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 11:27:20PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > I don't understand anymore anything. > > This afternoon i recompile k 2.4.23-pre9-pa13 + Randolph patch to test > it. (Ok) > > So I launch evolution which crash at >he same place as usual. > > After the diner I restart this c110 with this new kernel but this time, > no more "do_page_fault() pid=805 command='evolution' type=7". I restart > it severall time no means to reproduce anymore :( So it doesn't cras > anymore? :) c. _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tiscali ADSL: 3 mois GRATUITS! L'Internet rapide, c'est pour tout le monde. http://reg.tiscali.be/default.asp?lg=fr ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] 2003-11-03 9:11 ` Joel Soete @ 2003-11-08 12:46 ` Joel Soete 2003-11-08 15:52 ` Carlos O'Donell 2003-11-08 22:33 ` [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] Grant Grundler 0 siblings, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Joel Soete @ 2003-11-08 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joel Soete; +Cc: Carlos O'Donell, parisc-linux Hello Carlos, More and more strange behaviour: after my weekly apt-get dist-upgrade i relaunch evolution, it hang again at the same point with usual message: evolution (pid 2999): Protection id trap (code 27) [..] But if I launch it a second time no more pb??? Very strange isn't it? Joel Joel Soete wrote: > Carlos, > > Yes it didn't crash anymore :) > > But I didn't have more opportunity to reboot severall time this c110 to make > more test (the only difference between the two previous one: the first was > a reboot, the second was a boot? and absolutley no other changes). > > Cheers, > Joel > > > >>-- Original Message -- >>From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca> >>To: Joel Soete <soete.joel@tiscali.be> >>Cc: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org >>Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 15:22:28 -0500 >>Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: >>do_page_fault?] >> >> >>On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 11:27:20PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: >>Hi Carlos, >> >>I don't understand anymore anything. >> >>This afternoon i recompile k 2.4.23-pre9-pa13 + Randolph patch to test >>it. (Ok) >> >>So I launch evolution which crash at >>he same place as usual. >> >>After the diner I restart this c110 with this new kernel but this time, >>no more "do_page_fault() pid=805 command='evolution' type=7". I restart >>it severall time no means to reproduce anymore :( > > > So it doesn't cras > >>anymore? :) > > > c. > _______________________________________________ > parisc-linux mailing list > parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org > http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tiscali ADSL: 3 mois GRATUITS! L'Internet rapide, c'est pour tout le monde. > > http://reg.tiscali.be/default.asp?lg=fr > > > _______________________________________________ > parisc-linux mailing list > parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org > http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] 2003-11-08 12:46 ` Joel Soete @ 2003-11-08 15:52 ` Carlos O'Donell 2003-11-08 21:11 ` Joel Soete 2003-11-08 22:33 ` [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] Grant Grundler 1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Carlos O'Donell @ 2003-11-08 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joel Soete; +Cc: parisc-linux On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 12:46:28PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: > More and more strange behaviour: > > after my weekly apt-get dist-upgrade i relaunch evolution, > it hang again at the same point with usual message: > evolution (pid 2999): Protection id trap (code 27) > [..] > > But if I launch it a second time no more pb??? > > Very strange isn't it? Not at all! Anything is possible with some imagination :) If it's repeatable then we can catch it. Stick evolution under gdb and remember to preload a debugging libc and catch it when it crashes. Send the 'bt full' back to the list for analysis. c. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] 2003-11-08 15:52 ` Carlos O'Donell @ 2003-11-08 21:11 ` Joel Soete 2003-11-08 22:09 ` [parisc-linux] fork failed? protection id trap. All suspect Carlos O'Donell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Joel Soete @ 2003-11-08 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carlos O'Donell; +Cc: parisc-linux Well it seems that i reach to reproduce: just after a fresh reboot: I first export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/debug then launch gdb with "handle all nostop" and "handle all pass" (as recommended in a previous mail), (gdb) file /usr/bin/evolution (gdb) run all start fine until I point a mail to preview it in the preview's window. Then a child process failled, so Ctrl-C in gdb and bt: #0 0x4172005c in __pthread_sigsuspend () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #1 0x4171fde0 in __pthread_wait_for_restart_signal () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #2 0x4172181c in __pthread_alt_lock () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #3 0x4171e480 in pthread_mutex_lock () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #4 0x41a7226c in free () from /lib/libc.so.6 #5 0x41993654 in g_free () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #6 0x413453e0 in gtk_tooltips_new () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #7 0x41345c68 in gtk_tooltips_set_tip () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #8 0x407a6768 in bonobo_ui_toolbar_item_set_tooltip () from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0 #9 0x407a12fc in bonobo_ui_sync_status_new () from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0 #10 0x4079bfb0 in bonobo_ui_sync_state () from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0 #11 0x407963a0 in bonobo_ui_engine_get_view () from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0 #12 0x407966b4 in bonobo_ui_engine_get_view () from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0 #13 0x40796d10 in bonobo_ui_engine_update () from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0 #14 0x40793b5c in bonobo_ui_engine_xml_set_prop () from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0 #15 0x40898dfc in _ORBIT_skel_small_Bonobo_UIContainer_setAttr () from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0 #16 0x40b05174 in ORBit_c_stub_invoke () from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0 #17 0x4089d6c4 in Bonobo_UIContainer_setAttr () from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0 #18 0x4078dc84 in bonobo_ui_component_set_prop () from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0 #19 0x4078db8c in bonobo_ui_component_set_prop () from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0 #20 0x41ecbf08 in mail_disable_stop () from /usr/lib/evolution/1.4/components/libevolution-mail.so #21 0x41ecb074 in mail_call_main () from /usr/lib/evolution/1.4/components/libevolution-mail.so #22 0x41ec9a00 in mail_msg_wait_all () from /usr/lib/evolution/1.4/components/libevolution-mail.so #23 0x419b5044 in g_vsnprintf () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #24 0x4198c904 in unblock_source () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #25 0x4198ddcc in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #26 0x4198e1c0 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #27 0x4198eb70 in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #28 0x40881490 in bonobo_main () from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0 #29 0x0009deb8 in main () #30 0x41a1146c in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 #31 0x00022e10 in _start () ----------><---------- At the console, I could always capture: request_module[net-pf-10]: fork failed, errno 1 evolution (pid 879): Protection id trap (code 27) YZrvWESTHLNXBCVMcbcbcbcbOGFRQPDI PSW: 00000000000001000000000000001111 Not tainted r00-03 00000000 103b7524 1015352c 00282b28 r04-07 00000000 00000000 00000001 11f27da0 r08-11 00000000 00000001 13084548 fffffff2 r12-15 419ee608 419ee718 419345a8 419345a8 r16-19 419ee608 419345a8 00000070 1371d000 r20-23 00000000 00000002 00282b2e 00000000 r24-27 11f27da0 00000000 10d0b520 10304010 r28-31 00000000 10314a60 130845c0 101532c8 sr0-3 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000003 sr4-7 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 IASQ: 00000000 00000000 IAOQ: 10153658 1015365c IIR: 0ed4d240 ISR: 00000003 IOR: 00282b2e CPU: 0 CR30: 13084000 CR31: 103a8000 ORIG_R28: 419345a8 ----------><---------- while I can still see processes: $ ps -ef | grep evol root 869 863 8 17:15 pts/2 00:00:35 /usr/bin/evolution root 875 1 0 17:16 ? 00:00:02 /usr/lib/evolution/1.4/evolution-wombat --oaf-activate-iid=OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_Wombat_InterfaceCheck --oaf-ior-fd=25 root 877 1 0 17:16 ? 00:00:02 /usr/lib/evolution/1.4/evolution-alarm-notify --oaf-activate-iid=OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_Calendar_AlarmNotify_Factory --oaf-ior-fd=27 root 879 869 0 17:16 pts/2 00:00:00 [evolution] <defunct> ----------><---------- Unfortunately: # gdb program 879 GNU gdb 5.3-debian Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "hppa-linux". Attaching to process 879 ptrace: Operation not permitted. /root/879: No such file or directory. ----------><---------- Once again if I re-launch prgm, I do get any more the pb? What do you think? Thanks for help, Joel PS1: I would try to see if can can reproduce it (just after a fresh reboot) on my b2k (Monday only) PS2: Just as remainder, it is a fresh 'apt-get dist-upgrade' unstable debian runing on a c110 model with a merged kernel of mine 2.4.23-pre9-pa13 (which, else where, seems to run perfectly in 32 and 64 bits even in SMP mode on some L :) ) Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 12:46:28PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: > >>More and more strange behaviour: >> >>after my weekly apt-get dist-upgrade i relaunch evolution, >>it hang again at the same point with usual message: >>evolution (pid 2999): Protection id trap (code 27) >>[..] >> >>But if I launch it a second time no more pb??? >> >>Very strange isn't it? > > > Not at all! Anything is possible with some imagination :) > If it's repeatable then we can catch it. Stick evolution under gdb and > remember to preload a debugging libc and catch it when it crashes. Send > the 'bt full' back to the list for analysis. > > c. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [parisc-linux] fork failed? protection id trap. All suspect. 2003-11-08 21:11 ` Joel Soete @ 2003-11-08 22:09 ` Carlos O'Donell 2003-11-08 22:36 ` Joel Soete 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Carlos O'Donell @ 2003-11-08 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joel Soete; +Cc: parisc-linux, Matthew Wilcox On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 09:11:29PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: > all start fine until I point a mail to preview it in the preview's window. > Then a child process failled, so Ctrl-C in gdb and bt: > #0 0x4172005c in __pthread_sigsuspend () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 ... > #29 0x0009deb8 in main () > #30 0x41a1146c in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 > #31 0x00022e10 in _start () > ----------><---------- This is a trace from another thread. You need to attach to the thread that is going to die and try to get a backtrace. This thread was happy :) until you interrupted it's sleeping. > At the console, I could always capture: > > request_module[net-pf-10]: fork failed, errno 1 > evolution (pid 879): Protection id trap (code 27) > > YZrvWESTHLNXBCVMcbcbcbcbOGFRQPDI > PSW: 00000000000001000000000000001111 Not tainted > r00-03 00000000 103b7524 1015352c 00282b28 > r04-07 00000000 00000000 00000001 11f27da0 > r08-11 00000000 00000001 13084548 fffffff2 > r12-15 419ee608 419ee718 419345a8 419345a8 > r16-19 419ee608 419345a8 00000070 1371d000 > r20-23 00000000 00000002 00282b2e 00000000 > r24-27 11f27da0 00000000 10d0b520 10304010 > r28-31 00000000 10314a60 130845c0 101532c8 > sr0-3 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000003 > sr4-7 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > > IASQ: 00000000 00000000 IAOQ: 10153658 1015365c > IIR: 0ed4d240 ISR: 00000003 IOR: 00282b2e > CPU: 0 CR30: 13084000 CR31: 103a8000 > ORIG_R28: 419345a8 > > ----------><---------- I've never seen this perhaps some kernelish people would like to comment on this? > while I can still see processes: > root 879 869 0 17:16 pts/2 00:00:00 [evolution] <defunct> Try to find the thread that is going to die and attach to it. c. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] fork failed? protection id trap. All suspect. 2003-11-08 22:09 ` [parisc-linux] fork failed? protection id trap. All suspect Carlos O'Donell @ 2003-11-08 22:36 ` Joel Soete 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Joel Soete @ 2003-11-08 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carlos O'Donell; +Cc: parisc-linux, Matthew Wilcox Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 09:11:29PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: [...] >> >>request_module[net-pf-10]: fork failed, errno 1 >>evolution (pid 879): Protection id trap (code 27) >> >> YZrvWESTHLNXBCVMcbcbcbcbOGFRQPDI >>PSW: 00000000000001000000000000001111 Not tainted >>r00-03 00000000 103b7524 1015352c 00282b28 >>r04-07 00000000 00000000 00000001 11f27da0 >>r08-11 00000000 00000001 13084548 fffffff2 >>r12-15 419ee608 419ee718 419345a8 419345a8 >>r16-19 419ee608 419345a8 00000070 1371d000 >>r20-23 00000000 00000002 00282b2e 00000000 >>r24-27 11f27da0 00000000 10d0b520 10304010 >>r28-31 00000000 10314a60 130845c0 101532c8 >>sr0-3 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000003 >>sr4-7 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 >> >>IASQ: 00000000 00000000 IAOQ: 10153658 1015365c >> IIR: 0ed4d240 ISR: 00000003 IOR: 00282b2e >> CPU: 0 CR30: 13084000 CR31: 103a8000 >> ORIG_R28: 419345a8 >> >>----------><---------- > > > I've never seen this perhaps some kernelish people would like to comment > on this? > it is also possible that my merge broken something (but not enough time to check with original cvs, compiling a kernel with c110 is a long job :( ) btw i will try to see how (where) attaching "the thread that is going to die." Thanks a lot, Joel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] 2003-11-08 12:46 ` Joel Soete 2003-11-08 15:52 ` Carlos O'Donell @ 2003-11-08 22:33 ` Grant Grundler 2003-11-09 0:11 ` Joel Soete 1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Grant Grundler @ 2003-11-08 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joel Soete; +Cc: Carlos O'Donell, parisc-linux On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 12:46:28PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: > But if I launch it a second time no more pb??? > Very strange isn't it? Sounds like a cache coherency/aliasing problem. Once you start looking at code, watch out for module loading and shared memory maps type stuff. grant ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] 2003-11-08 22:33 ` [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] Grant Grundler @ 2003-11-09 0:11 ` Joel Soete 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Joel Soete @ 2003-11-09 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Grant Grundler; +Cc: Carlos O'Donell, parisc-linux Grant Grundler wrote: > On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 12:46:28PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: > >>But if I launch it a second time no more pb??? >>Very strange isn't it? > > > Sounds like a cache coherency/aliasing problem. > Once you start looking at code, watch out for module loading > and shared memory maps type stuff. > > grant > Thanks Grant, I have to put it in my todo list (sorry not enough time in a day) Joel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-11-09 0:11 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2003-10-10 22:17 [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) do_page_fault? Joel Soete 2003-10-12 18:16 ` Carlos O'Donell 2003-10-12 18:42 ` Joel Soete 2003-10-12 20:02 ` Carlos O'Donell 2003-10-13 11:44 ` Joel Soete 2003-10-18 21:13 ` Joel Soete 2003-10-19 15:28 ` Joel Soete 2003-10-19 19:49 ` [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] Joel Soete 2003-10-19 23:10 ` Carlos O'Donell 2003-10-21 6:24 ` Joel Soete 2003-11-01 23:27 ` Joel Soete 2003-11-02 20:22 ` Carlos O'Donell 2003-11-03 9:11 ` Joel Soete 2003-11-08 12:46 ` Joel Soete 2003-11-08 15:52 ` Carlos O'Donell 2003-11-08 21:11 ` Joel Soete 2003-11-08 22:09 ` [parisc-linux] fork failed? protection id trap. All suspect Carlos O'Donell 2003-11-08 22:36 ` Joel Soete 2003-11-08 22:33 ` [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] Grant Grundler 2003-11-09 0:11 ` Joel Soete
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.