All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* from pupa to grub or grub2
@ 2004-03-07 11:35 Yoshinori K. Okuji
  2004-03-11  7:55 ` chaac
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yoshinori K. Okuji @ 2004-03-07 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: grub-devel

Now this list is functional. There seems to be some trouble in the GNU 
mail server, though.

I started to replace pupa with grub or grub2. It still contains PUPA in 
many places, but I'd like to remove all PUPA names from GRUB 2, so that 
the user wouldn't be confused with the mixture of project names.

But I have one question: Which is better, GRUB 2 or GRUB? Since the code 
base is quite different, I think the distinction between GRUB and GRUB 
2 is a good thing, although I prefer GRUB to GRUB 2 as a software name.

For now, I call it sometimes GRUB 2, and sometimes just GRUB. IMO, it is 
better to have a good guideline which specifies which name should be 
used in a given situation. Do you have any idea?

Okuji




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-14 17:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-07 11:35 from pupa to grub or grub2 Yoshinori K. Okuji
2004-03-11  7:55 ` chaac
2004-03-14 17:06   ` Yoshinori K. Okuji
2004-03-11 11:09 ` M. Gerards
2004-03-11 12:58 ` Johan Rydberg
2004-03-12  0:01 ` Jeff Sheinberg

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.