From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
To: 'Todd Poynor' <tpoynor@mvista.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
CPU Freq ML <cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>
Subject: RE: add lowpower_idle sysctl
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:20:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200403251920.i2PJKwF25849@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <405A29EA.6000400@mvista.com>
>>>>> Todd Poynor wrote on Thu, March 18, 2004 3:00 PM
> I'd vote for using Patrick Mochel's PM subsystem and use a standard
> set of identifiers that are mapped to a platform-specific idle behavior,
> in much the same way as platform suspend modes are handled today. For
> example, strings echoed to /sys/power/idle could be an interface. If
> folks are amenable to this I'd be happy to supply a (generic) patch for it.
Just wondering what is the state of development for this new PM scheme?
I don't check LKML that frequently, sorry if I miss any posting on LKML.
- Ken
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
To: 'Todd Poynor' <tpoynor@mvista.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
CPU Freq ML <cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>
Subject: RE: add lowpower_idle sysctl
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:20:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200403251920.i2PJKwF25849@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <405A29EA.6000400@mvista.com>
In-Reply-To: <200403180031.i2I0VQF02038@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
>>>>> Todd Poynor wrote on Thu, March 18, 2004 3:00 PM
> I'd vote for using Patrick Mochel's PM subsystem and use a standard
> set of identifiers that are mapped to a platform-specific idle behavior,
> in much the same way as platform suspend modes are handled today. For
> example, strings echoed to /sys/power/idle could be an interface. If
> folks are amenable to this I'd be happy to supply a (generic) patch for it.
Just wondering what is the state of development for this new PM scheme?
I don't check LKML that frequently, sorry if I miss any posting on LKML.
- Ken
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
To: "'Todd Poynor'" <tpoynor@mvista.com>
Cc: <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"CPU Freq ML" <cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>
Subject: RE: add lowpower_idle sysctl
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:20:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200403251920.i2PJKwF25849@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <405A29EA.6000400@mvista.com>
>>>>> Todd Poynor wrote on Thu, March 18, 2004 3:00 PM
> I'd vote for using Patrick Mochel's PM subsystem and use a standard
> set of identifiers that are mapped to a platform-specific idle behavior,
> in much the same way as platform suspend modes are handled today. For
> example, strings echoed to /sys/power/idle could be an interface. If
> folks are amenable to this I'd be happy to supply a (generic) patch for it.
Just wondering what is the state of development for this new PM scheme?
I don't check LKML that frequently, sorry if I miss any posting on LKML.
- Ken
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-25 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-18 0:31 add lowpower_idle sysctl Kenneth Chen
2004-03-18 0:31 ` Kenneth Chen
2004-03-18 1:04 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 1:04 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 9:42 ` Pasi Savolainen
2004-03-18 3:18 ` Kenneth Chen
2004-03-18 3:18 ` Kenneth Chen
2004-03-18 3:28 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 3:28 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 3:40 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-03-18 3:40 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-03-18 9:05 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-03-18 9:05 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-03-18 18:29 ` Kenneth Chen
2004-03-18 18:29 ` Kenneth Chen
2004-03-18 18:29 ` Kenneth Chen
2004-03-18 22:59 ` Todd Poynor
2004-03-18 22:59 ` Todd Poynor
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-19 0:43 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-03-19 0:43 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-03-25 19:20 ` Chen, Kenneth W [this message]
2004-03-25 19:20 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-03-25 19:20 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-03-18 21:59 ` Kenneth Chen
2004-03-18 21:59 ` Kenneth Chen
2004-03-18 22:35 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 22:35 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-24 9:54 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 9:54 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 9:56 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 9:56 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-25 19:04 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-03-25 19:04 ` Chen, Kenneth W
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-18 7:49 Ross Dickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200403251920.i2PJKwF25849@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tpoynor@mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.