From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@in.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Refcounting of objects part of a lockfree collection
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:03:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040714180344.GA22593@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040714174948.GA3935@in.ibm.com>
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 11:19:49PM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 10:03:37AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 08:52:35PM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> > > He is just adding lock-free support from an existing refcounting
> > > mechanism that is used in VFS.
> >
> > If this is true, then I strongly object to the naming of this file, and
> > the name of the typedef (which shouldn't be a typedef at all) and this
> > should be made a private data structure to the vfs so no one else tries
> > to use it. Otherwise it will be used.
>
> I am reasonably sure that when that patch was done (months ago) kref wasn't
> there. Now that kref.[ch] is around, everything can be put there.
I agree.
> Now, if struct kref is shrinked (want patch ? ;-), all this
> can possibly be nicely collapsed into one set of APIs for refcounting.
Sounds good to me.
> There aren't many users of kref yet, so this seems like a good
> time to do it. Was there any objection to shrinking it ?
None that I know of. In fact, it's on my list of things to do, so a
patch from someone else to fix this would be greatly appreciated.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-14 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-14 4:53 [RFC] Refcounting of objects part of a lockfree collection Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2004-07-14 4:56 ` [RFC] Lock free fd lookup Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2004-07-14 15:17 ` Chris Wright
2004-07-15 14:22 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-15 16:10 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-07-15 16:22 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-15 16:34 ` Chris Wright
2004-07-16 5:38 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2004-07-16 6:27 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-17 0:55 ` Keith Owens
2004-07-17 1:19 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-17 2:12 ` Keith Owens
2004-07-17 2:34 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-17 2:28 ` Keith Owens
2004-07-17 3:16 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-17 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2004-07-14 7:07 ` [RFC] Refcounting of objects part of a lockfree collection Greg KH
2004-07-14 8:26 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-07-14 14:26 ` Greg KH
2004-07-14 15:22 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-07-14 17:03 ` Greg KH
2004-07-14 17:49 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-07-14 18:03 ` Greg KH [this message]
2004-07-15 6:21 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2004-07-15 6:56 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-07-14 8:57 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2004-07-14 17:08 ` Greg KH
2004-07-14 18:17 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-07-15 8:02 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2004-07-15 9:36 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-07-16 14:32 ` Greg KH
2004-07-16 15:50 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-14 10:24 Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040714180344.GA22593@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=kiran@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.