* Bug report: slab error at module removal @ 2004-08-14 4:26 Mathieu Segaud 2004-08-14 18:51 ` Lamont R. Peterson 2004-08-15 16:16 ` Alex Zarochentsev 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Segaud @ 2004-08-14 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: reiserfs-list I don't know if this is the right place, but I just saw a kernel message in my dmesg. The box is a test box with 7 Reiser4 FSes. 5 of them are LVM2 logical volumes. And the device-mapper is used to crypt root partition (cipher AES). All Reiser4 partitions have been converted to 1.0.0 layout/format, and were consistent at boot time. After several hours of running some moderatly high load stuff on each of them (big transfert of data, long repacker runs...). I decided to umount them and unload reiser4.ko module. dmesg gave this message: slab error in kmem_cache_destroy(): cache `plugin_set': Can't free all objects [<c0135c41>] kmem_cache_destroy+0xd1/0x130 [<f99bf57a>] plugin_set_done+0xa/0x30 [reiser4] [<f99b9194>] shutdown_reiser4+0xf4/0x210 [reiser4] [<c012a004>] sys_delete_module+0x144/0x180 [<c013ea9e>] unmap_vma_list+0xe/0x20 [<c013edcf>] do_munmap+0xef/0x150 [<c0103afd>] sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x71 SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name The FSes are still consistent (fsck'ed with no --fix needed). Unfortunatly, I turned off debugging options to test latest snapshot performance. I can rebuild the module with debugging options on, and try to give you a more accurate report to help find the memory leak. Regards, -- Mathieu Segaud ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug report: slab error at module removal 2004-08-14 4:26 Bug report: slab error at module removal Mathieu Segaud @ 2004-08-14 18:51 ` Lamont R. Peterson 2004-08-15 16:31 ` Alex Zarochentsev 2004-08-15 16:16 ` Alex Zarochentsev 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Lamont R. Peterson @ 2004-08-14 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: reiserfs-list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1915 bytes --] On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 22:26, Mathieu Segaud wrote: > I don't know if this is the right place, but I just saw a kernel message > in my dmesg. [SNIP] > After several hours of running some moderatly high load stuff > on each of them (big transfert of data, long repacker runs...). > I decided to umount them and unload reiser4.ko module. > dmesg gave this message: I thought that building reiser4 as a module was still not ready. Is that true? Is it safe to build and load as a module but does not remove cleanly yet? Is that the reason reiser4 as a kernel module was not ready? > slab error in kmem_cache_destroy(): cache `plugin_set': Can't free all objects > [<c0135c41>] kmem_cache_destroy+0xd1/0x130 > [<f99bf57a>] plugin_set_done+0xa/0x30 [reiser4] > [<f99b9194>] shutdown_reiser4+0xf4/0x210 [reiser4] > [<c012a004>] sys_delete_module+0x144/0x180 > [<c013ea9e>] unmap_vma_list+0xe/0x20 > [<c013edcf>] do_munmap+0xef/0x150 > [<c0103afd>] sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x71 > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > > The FSes are still consistent (fsck'ed with no --fix needed). > Unfortunatly, I turned off debugging options to test latest snapshot > performance. I can rebuild the module with debugging options on, > and try to give you a more accurate report to help find the memory leak. > > Regards, -- Lamont R. Peterson <lamont@gurulabs.com> Senior Instructor Guru Labs http://www.gurulabs.com/ [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug report: slab error at module removal 2004-08-14 18:51 ` Lamont R. Peterson @ 2004-08-15 16:31 ` Alex Zarochentsev 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Alex Zarochentsev @ 2004-08-15 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lamont R. Peterson; +Cc: reiserfs-list On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 12:51:42PM -0600, Lamont R. Peterson wrote: > On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 22:26, Mathieu Segaud wrote: > > I don't know if this is the right place, but I just saw a kernel message > > in my dmesg. > [SNIP] > > After several hours of running some moderatly high load stuff > > on each of them (big transfert of data, long repacker runs...). > > I decided to umount them and unload reiser4.ko module. > > dmesg gave this message: > > I thought that building reiser4 as a module was still not ready. Is > that true? > > Is it safe to build and load as a module but does not remove cleanly > yet? Is that the reason reiser4 as a kernel module was not ready? reiser4-as-module is supposed to work :) If it doesn't please report the bug to the mailing list. > > slab error in kmem_cache_destroy(): cache `plugin_set': Can't free all objects > > [<c0135c41>] kmem_cache_destroy+0xd1/0x130 > > [<f99bf57a>] plugin_set_done+0xa/0x30 [reiser4] > > [<f99b9194>] shutdown_reiser4+0xf4/0x210 [reiser4] > > [<c012a004>] sys_delete_module+0x144/0x180 > > [<c013ea9e>] unmap_vma_list+0xe/0x20 > > [<c013edcf>] do_munmap+0xef/0x150 > > [<c0103afd>] sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x71 > > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > > > > The FSes are still consistent (fsck'ed with no --fix needed). > > Unfortunatly, I turned off debugging options to test latest snapshot > > performance. I can rebuild the module with debugging options on, > > and try to give you a more accurate report to help find the memory leak. > > > > Regards, > -- > Lamont R. Peterson <lamont@gurulabs.com> > Senior Instructor > Guru Labs http://www.gurulabs.com/ -- Alex. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug report: slab error at module removal 2004-08-14 4:26 Bug report: slab error at module removal Mathieu Segaud 2004-08-14 18:51 ` Lamont R. Peterson @ 2004-08-15 16:16 ` Alex Zarochentsev 2004-08-15 20:01 ` Mathieu Segaud 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Alex Zarochentsev @ 2004-08-15 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mathieu Segaud; +Cc: reiserfs-list On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 06:26:36AM +0200, Mathieu Segaud wrote: > > I don't know if this is the right place, but I just saw a kernel message > in my dmesg. > > The box is a test box with 7 Reiser4 FSes. > 5 of them are LVM2 logical volumes. And the device-mapper > is used to crypt root partition (cipher AES). > All Reiser4 partitions have been converted to 1.0.0 layout/format, > and were consistent at boot time. > After several hours of running some moderatly high load stuff > on each of them (big transfert of data, long repacker runs...). > I decided to umount them and unload reiser4.ko module. > dmesg gave this message: > > slab error in kmem_cache_destroy(): cache `plugin_set': Can't free all objects > [<c0135c41>] kmem_cache_destroy+0xd1/0x130 > [<f99bf57a>] plugin_set_done+0xa/0x30 [reiser4] > [<f99b9194>] shutdown_reiser4+0xf4/0x210 [reiser4] > [<c012a004>] sys_delete_module+0x144/0x180 > [<c013ea9e>] unmap_vma_list+0xe/0x20 > [<c013edcf>] do_munmap+0xef/0x150 > [<c0103afd>] sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x71 > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > SLAB: cache with size 64 has lost its name > > The FSes are still consistent (fsck'ed with no --fix needed). > Unfortunatly, I turned off debugging options to test latest snapshot > performance. I can rebuild the module with debugging options on, > and try to give you a more accurate report to help find the memory leak. can you try the following patch: # This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch. # # ChangeSet # 2004/08/15 20:07:10+04:00 zam@crimson.namesys.com # plugin_set_done: first clean the hash table and free all elements, then remove the slab cache. # # plugin/plugin_set.c # 2004/08/15 20:07:07+04:00 zam@crimson.namesys.com +1 -1 # plugin_set_done: first clean the hash table and free all elements, then remove the slab cache. # diff -Nru a/plugin/plugin_set.c b/plugin/plugin_set.c --- a/plugin/plugin_set.c Sun Aug 15 20:12:29 2004 +++ b/plugin/plugin_set.c Sun Aug 15 20:12:29 2004 @@ -329,8 +329,8 @@ reiser4_internal void plugin_set_done(void) { /* NOTE: scan hash table and recycle all objects. */ - kmem_cache_destroy(plugin_set_slab); ps_hash_done(&ps_table); + kmem_cache_destroy(plugin_set_slab); } > > Regards, > > -- > Mathieu Segaud > -- Alex. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug report: slab error at module removal 2004-08-15 16:16 ` Alex Zarochentsev @ 2004-08-15 20:01 ` Mathieu Segaud 2004-08-16 14:23 ` Alex Zarochentsev 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Segaud @ 2004-08-15 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alex Zarochentsev; +Cc: reiserfs-list Alex Zarochentsev <zam@namesys.com> writes: > On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 06:26:36AM +0200, Mathieu Segaud wrote: >> slab error in kmem_cache_destroy(): cache `plugin_set': Can't free all objects >> [<c0135c41>] kmem_cache_destroy+0xd1/0x130 >> [<f99bf57a>] plugin_set_done+0xa/0x30 [reiser4] >> [<f99b9194>] shutdown_reiser4+0xf4/0x210 [reiser4] >> [<c012a004>] sys_delete_module+0x144/0x180 >> [<c013ea9e>] unmap_vma_list+0xe/0x20 >> [<c013edcf>] do_munmap+0xef/0x150 >> [<c0103afd>] sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x71 This does not seem to fix every leak... I got the same message at module removal (this time the fs had been mounted, one of them was used to compile lirc, and each one was then umounted) > can you try the following patch: > > # This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch. > # > # ChangeSet > # 2004/08/15 20:07:10+04:00 zam@crimson.namesys.com > # plugin_set_done: first clean the hash table and free all elements, then remove the slab cache. > # > # plugin/plugin_set.c > # 2004/08/15 20:07:07+04:00 zam@crimson.namesys.com +1 -1 > # plugin_set_done: first clean the hash table and free all elements, then remove the slab cache. > # > diff -Nru a/plugin/plugin_set.c b/plugin/plugin_set.c > --- a/plugin/plugin_set.c Sun Aug 15 20:12:29 2004 > +++ b/plugin/plugin_set.c Sun Aug 15 20:12:29 2004 > @@ -329,8 +329,8 @@ > reiser4_internal void plugin_set_done(void) > { > /* NOTE: scan hash table and recycle all objects. */ > - kmem_cache_destroy(plugin_set_slab); > ps_hash_done(&ps_table); > + kmem_cache_destroy(plugin_set_slab); > } > I forgot again to reenable DEBUG options. I will give it a try this night. -- Mathieu Segaud ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug report: slab error at module removal 2004-08-15 20:01 ` Mathieu Segaud @ 2004-08-16 14:23 ` Alex Zarochentsev 2004-08-16 20:52 ` Mathieu Segaud 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Alex Zarochentsev @ 2004-08-16 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mathieu Segaud; +Cc: reiserfs-list On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 10:01:06PM +0200, Mathieu Segaud wrote: > Alex Zarochentsev <zam@namesys.com> writes: > > > On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 06:26:36AM +0200, Mathieu Segaud wrote: > > >> slab error in kmem_cache_destroy(): cache `plugin_set': Can't free all objects > >> [<c0135c41>] kmem_cache_destroy+0xd1/0x130 > >> [<f99bf57a>] plugin_set_done+0xa/0x30 [reiser4] > >> [<f99b9194>] shutdown_reiser4+0xf4/0x210 [reiser4] > >> [<c012a004>] sys_delete_module+0x144/0x180 > >> [<c013ea9e>] unmap_vma_list+0xe/0x20 > >> [<c013edcf>] do_munmap+0xef/0x150 > >> [<c0103afd>] sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x71 > > This does not seem to fix every leak... ah, sorry, the fix was wrong, try this one: diff -Nru a/plugin/plugin_set.c b/plugin/plugin_set.c --- a/plugin/plugin_set.c Mon Aug 16 18:21:38 2004 +++ b/plugin/plugin_set.c Mon Aug 16 18:21:38 2004 @@ -328,7 +328,12 @@ reiser4_internal void plugin_set_done(void) { - /* NOTE: scan hash table and recycle all objects. */ + plugin_set * cur, * next; + + for_all_in_htable(&ps_table, ps, cur, next) { + ps_hash_remove(&ps_table, cur); + kmem_cache_free(plugin_set_slab, cur); + } kmem_cache_destroy(plugin_set_slab); ps_hash_done(&ps_table); } > I got the same message at module removal (this time the fs had been mounted, > one of them was used to compile lirc, and each one was then umounted) > > > can you try the following patch: > > > > # This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch. > > # > > # ChangeSet > > # 2004/08/15 20:07:10+04:00 zam@crimson.namesys.com > > # plugin_set_done: first clean the hash table and free all elements, then remove the slab cache. > > # > > # plugin/plugin_set.c > > # 2004/08/15 20:07:07+04:00 zam@crimson.namesys.com +1 -1 > > # plugin_set_done: first clean the hash table and free all elements, then remove the slab cache. > > # > > diff -Nru a/plugin/plugin_set.c b/plugin/plugin_set.c > > --- a/plugin/plugin_set.c Sun Aug 15 20:12:29 2004 > > +++ b/plugin/plugin_set.c Sun Aug 15 20:12:29 2004 > > @@ -329,8 +329,8 @@ > > reiser4_internal void plugin_set_done(void) > > { > > /* NOTE: scan hash table and recycle all objects. */ > > - kmem_cache_destroy(plugin_set_slab); > > ps_hash_done(&ps_table); > > + kmem_cache_destroy(plugin_set_slab); > > } > > > > I forgot again to reenable DEBUG options. I will give it a try this night. > > -- > Mathieu Segaud > -- Alex. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug report: slab error at module removal 2004-08-16 14:23 ` Alex Zarochentsev @ 2004-08-16 20:52 ` Mathieu Segaud 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Segaud @ 2004-08-16 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alex Zarochentsev; +Cc: reiserfs-list Alex Zarochentsev <zam@namesys.com> writes: > ah, sorry, the fix was wrong, try this one: This time, module removal issues no slab error. Thanks a lot. It will sit in my patchset till next snapshot :-) Regards, -- Mathieu Segaud ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-08-16 20:52 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2004-08-14 4:26 Bug report: slab error at module removal Mathieu Segaud 2004-08-14 18:51 ` Lamont R. Peterson 2004-08-15 16:31 ` Alex Zarochentsev 2004-08-15 16:16 ` Alex Zarochentsev 2004-08-15 20:01 ` Mathieu Segaud 2004-08-16 14:23 ` Alex Zarochentsev 2004-08-16 20:52 ` Mathieu Segaud
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.