From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
To: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
Jeremy Higdon <jeremy@sgi.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
mdr@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, jeremy@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com,
djh@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, jbarnes@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: SCSI QLA not working on latest *-mm SN2
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 02:25:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040918012517.GA642@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040918011510.GA31628@praka.san.rr.com>
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 06:15:10PM -0700, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Just to confirm if we absolutely have to do this...the offending reads
> > to issue the posting flush were to the register you just wrote to to get
> > the chip to reset. However, any MMIO read to any region of that card
> > would also trigger a posted write flush. Does the chip drop entirely
> > off the PCI bus during the execution of reset, or could we perhaps issue
> > an innocuous read to somewhere in PCI configuration space for the card?
>
> I had asked the hardware guy a similar question -- for the soft-reset
> operation, we'll _not_ be able to issue additional readw()s until '16
> PCI clocks elapse.' So, it seems we'll have to settle with the
> udelay() in this particular instance.
But the write that starts the reset can be delayed arbitrarily, so we need
to do *some* kind of read from the device to be know that it got there.
Can we access config space instead of mmio space?
--
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-18 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-17 22:55 SCSI QLA not working on latest *-mm SN2 Andrew Vasquez
2004-09-17 23:10 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-17 23:55 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-18 1:15 ` Andrew Vasquez
2004-09-18 1:25 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2004-09-18 1:24 ` Andrew Vasquez
2004-09-18 2:36 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-18 19:12 ` James Bottomley
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-21 21:22 Andrew Vasquez
2004-09-21 21:44 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-21 22:37 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 22:49 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-21 20:50 Andrew Vasquez
2004-09-21 21:06 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-21 22:36 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 22:39 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-21 22:43 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 22:54 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-21 23:17 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-22 21:33 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 17:33 Andrew Vasquez
2004-09-21 17:52 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 18:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-21 18:59 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-21 19:10 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 15:58 Andrew Vasquez
2004-09-21 16:07 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 16:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-21 16:33 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-21 20:39 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-21 20:43 ` Jeremy Higdon
[not found] <B179AE41C1147041AA1121F44614F0B060EF48@AVEXCH02.qlogic.org>
[not found] ` <20040916121235.5e4f9c32.pj@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <1095362263.16326.12.camel@praka>
2004-09-16 19:56 ` Paul Jackson
2004-09-16 20:05 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-16 20:56 ` Andrew Vasquez
2004-09-16 21:09 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-16 21:40 ` Andrew Vasquez
2004-09-16 22:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-16 22:29 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-17 17:21 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-18 6:10 ` Grant Grundler
2004-09-20 22:40 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-20 23:27 ` Grant Grundler
2004-09-21 0:09 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 5:46 ` Grant Grundler
2004-09-21 6:45 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-21 13:29 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 13:25 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 15:13 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 15:41 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-21 15:58 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 16:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-21 16:05 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 16:11 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-21 16:18 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 16:24 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-21 17:03 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 17:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-21 17:24 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 17:20 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-21 17:46 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 17:56 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-21 18:09 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 19:06 ` Grant Grundler
2004-09-21 19:40 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 22:44 ` Grant Grundler
2004-09-21 21:03 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-21 21:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-21 21:43 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-21 22:33 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-22 0:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-22 1:16 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-22 1:44 ` Grant Grundler
2004-09-22 2:58 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-21 23:03 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-09-16 23:14 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-16 20:11 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-15 22:51 Paul Jackson
2004-09-15 23:13 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040918012517.GA642@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=willy@debian.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com \
--cc=djh@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=jbarnes@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=jeremy@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=jeremy@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdr@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.