From: "Mark Williams (MWP)" <mwp@internode.on.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Weighted packet shaping?
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 15:19:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041224150730.GA18760@linux.comp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041221034303.GB27656@linux.comp>
> >>For now try making a parent with rate and ceil 220kbit.
> >>Have 4 child/leaf classes like - (assuming 1 is highest priority)
> >>
> >>class 1 rate 120 ceil 220 prio 0
> >>class 2 rate 50 ceil 220 prio 1
> >>class 3 rate 25 ceil 220 prio 2
> >>class 4 rate 25 ceil 220 prio 3
> >>
> >>There are other tweaks you can try, it depends how much you care about
> >>latency. You could also share the windows boxes bandwidth by IP.
> >>
> >>I don't do it quite like the above - so if it doesn't work, say and I'll
> >>think again.
> >
> > <snip>
>
>
> Try to make it look like I said - back off from 256 ceil, make rates add
> up to master rate (220), give interactive more rate than it will ever need.
Ok, im now trying:
class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 220kbit
class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 70kbit ceil 220kbit prio 1
class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1:1 classid 1:21 htb rate 50kbit ceil 220kbit prio 2
class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1:1 classid 1:22 htb rate 25kbit ceil 220kbit prio 3
class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1:1 classid 1:23 htb rate 25kbit ceil 220kbit prio 4
class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1:1 classid 1:24 htb rate 25kbit ceil 220kbit prio 5
class add dev $INTERFACE parent 1:1 classid 1:25 htb rate 25kbit ceil 220kbit prio 8
Its simply not working.
Bittorrent is using ~22kb/sec on class 25, leaving the FTP upload (class 22)
sitting on only ~3kb/sec.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-24 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-21 3:55 [LARTC] Weighted packet shaping? Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-22 4:53 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-22 9:07 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-12-22 13:49 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-22 15:48 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-22 22:54 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-23 10:56 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-24 14:08 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-24 15:19 ` Mark Williams (MWP) [this message]
2004-12-24 16:36 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-26 4:38 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-26 13:09 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-28 9:35 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-29 2:46 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-29 6:52 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-29 13:26 ` Francisco Pereira
2004-12-30 0:05 ` Andy Furniss
2005-01-03 11:22 ` marco ghidinelli
2005-01-04 13:57 ` Andy Furniss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041224150730.GA18760@linux.comp \
--to=mwp@internode.on.net \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.