From: Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Weighted packet shaping?
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:54:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41C9FB14.6000805@dsl.pipex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041221034303.GB27656@linux.comp>
Mark Williams (MWP) wrote:
> Ok.
>
> My Linux (which is connected to the ADLS modem) box runs HTTP, FTP, etc services and also runs bittorrent, edonkey,
> etc.
> I have two other PCs (both windows) which connect to the internet via the Linux
> box (MASQ).
>
> Now, i want data like SSH, ICMP, DNS from any source to ppp0 to get top priority.
> I want the two windows PCs to get 2nd priority.
> I want services to get 3rd, and the rest (torrents, etc) to get the lowest
> priority.
>
> I have this setup atm using HTB and SFQ.
>
> Now this is what happens:
> I have bittorrent going as fast as possible outbound.
> I then use my linux box to send FTP data over the same link.
>
> Im finding that packet shaping is splitting the outbound bandwidth (256kbit)
> equally between the two.
>
> This is not what im after... want the windows box to take more bandwidth off
> bittorrent than 50% like it is atm.
>
> Does this explain my problem better?
Yes, you can do this with htb.
You'll need to back off a bit from 256kbit to allow for overheads - this
is tweakable with patch Ed posted to the list - you could also shape
incoming, but you would need IMQ which involves patching/doing new kernel.
For now try making a parent with rate and ceil 220kbit.
Have 4 child/leaf classes like - (assuming 1 is highest priority)
class 1 rate 120 ceil 220 prio 0
class 2 rate 50 ceil 220 prio 1
class 3 rate 25 ceil 220 prio 2
class 4 rate 25 ceil 220 prio 3
There are other tweaks you can try, it depends how much you care about
latency. You could also share the windows boxes bandwidth by IP.
I don't do it quite like the above - so if it doesn't work, say and I'll
think again.
Andy.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-22 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-21 3:55 [LARTC] Weighted packet shaping? Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-22 4:53 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-22 9:07 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-12-22 13:49 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-22 15:48 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-22 22:54 ` Andy Furniss [this message]
2004-12-23 10:56 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-24 14:08 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-24 15:19 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-24 16:36 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-26 4:38 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-26 13:09 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-28 9:35 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-29 2:46 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-29 6:52 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-29 13:26 ` Francisco Pereira
2004-12-30 0:05 ` Andy Furniss
2005-01-03 11:22 ` marco ghidinelli
2005-01-04 13:57 ` Andy Furniss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41C9FB14.6000805@dsl.pipex.com \
--to=andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.