From: Ed Wildgoose <lists@wildgooses.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Weighted packet shaping?
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 09:07:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41C9394B.8040006@wildgooses.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041221034303.GB27656@linux.comp>
>Im after shaping that has "weights" for classes so that a lower priority class
>will slow down when a higher class wants to flow more data.
>As far as i can see, HTB wont do this...
>
>
I'm not quite sure what you mean? HTB itself dequeues at a rate limited
pace. However, by combining several HTB classes, each with a different
priority and using the tc/mark to filter certain traffic into each
bucket you will achieve what you want I think?
I'm sure wondershaper and all the other example scripts have this kind
of thing setup as well?
However, the problem I think with the "weighting" is that it's not
really designed to be used like this. The idea is that each class
limits traffic to it's stated bandwidth and only the excess is shared
based on priority...
I didn't know there was a WRR module though? Where did you find it?
Perhaps you could describe the real problem a little more and someone
might have a better way for you to do this
Ed W
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-22 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-21 3:55 [LARTC] Weighted packet shaping? Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-22 4:53 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-22 9:07 ` Ed Wildgoose [this message]
2004-12-22 13:49 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-22 15:48 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-22 22:54 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-23 10:56 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-24 14:08 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-24 15:19 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-24 16:36 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-26 4:38 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-26 13:09 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-28 9:35 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-29 2:46 ` Andy Furniss
2004-12-29 6:52 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-29 13:26 ` Francisco Pereira
2004-12-30 0:05 ` Andy Furniss
2005-01-03 11:22 ` marco ghidinelli
2005-01-04 13:57 ` Andy Furniss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41C9394B.8040006@wildgooses.com \
--to=lists@wildgooses.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.