All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [KJ] [PATCH] net/3c505: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep()
@ 2005-05-02  6:14 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Aravamudan @ 2005-05-02  6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: philb; +Cc: netdev, Kernel-Janitors

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1028 bytes --]

Use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee the task delays
as expected.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>

--- 2.6.12-rc3/drivers/net/3c505.c	2005-04-29 11:03:04.000000000 -0700
+++ 2.6.12-rc3-dev/drivers/net/3c505.c	2005-05-01 20:52:01.000000000 -0700
@@ -1317,8 +1317,7 @@ static int __init elp_sense(struct net_d
 	if (orig_HSR & DIR) {
 		/* If HCR.DIR is up, we pull it down. HSR.DIR should follow. */
 		outb(0, dev->base_addr + PORT_CONTROL);
-		set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-		schedule_timeout(30*HZ/100);
+		msleep(300);
 		if (inb_status(addr) & DIR) {
 			if (elp_debug > 0)
 				printk(notfound_msg, 2);
@@ -1327,8 +1326,7 @@ static int __init elp_sense(struct net_d
 	} else {
 		/* If HCR.DIR is down, we pull it up. HSR.DIR should follow. */
 		outb(DIR, dev->base_addr + PORT_CONTROL);
-		set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-		schedule_timeout(30*HZ/100);
+		msleep(300);
 		if (!(inb_status(addr) & DIR)) {
 			if (elp_debug > 0)
 				printk(notfound_msg, 3);

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [KJ] [PATCH] net/3c505: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep()
@ 2005-05-02  6:14 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Aravamudan @ 2005-05-02  6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: philb; +Cc: netdev, Kernel-Janitors

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1028 bytes --]

Use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee the task delays
as expected.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>

--- 2.6.12-rc3/drivers/net/3c505.c	2005-04-29 11:03:04.000000000 -0700
+++ 2.6.12-rc3-dev/drivers/net/3c505.c	2005-05-01 20:52:01.000000000 -0700
@@ -1317,8 +1317,7 @@ static int __init elp_sense(struct net_d
 	if (orig_HSR & DIR) {
 		/* If HCR.DIR is up, we pull it down. HSR.DIR should follow. */
 		outb(0, dev->base_addr + PORT_CONTROL);
-		set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-		schedule_timeout(30*HZ/100);
+		msleep(300);
 		if (inb_status(addr) & DIR) {
 			if (elp_debug > 0)
 				printk(notfound_msg, 2);
@@ -1327,8 +1326,7 @@ static int __init elp_sense(struct net_d
 	} else {
 		/* If HCR.DIR is down, we pull it up. HSR.DIR should follow. */
 		outb(DIR, dev->base_addr + PORT_CONTROL);
-		set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-		schedule_timeout(30*HZ/100);
+		msleep(300);
 		if (!(inb_status(addr) & DIR)) {
 			if (elp_debug > 0)
 				printk(notfound_msg, 3);

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [KJ] [PATCH] i386/apm: use wait_event_interruptible_timeout()
  2005-05-02  6:14 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
@ 2005-05-02  6:18 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Aravamudan @ 2005-05-02  6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernel-janitors

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1192 bytes --]

Use wait_event_interruptible_timeout() instead of custom wait-queue.


Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>

--- 2.6.12-rc3/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c	2005-04-29 11:03:03.000000000 -0700
+++ 2.6.12-rc3-dev/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c	2005-05-01 19:02:48.000000000 -0700
@@ -224,6 +224,7 @@
 #include <linux/smp_lock.h>
 #include <linux/dmi.h>
 #include <linux/suspend.h>
+#include <linux/wait.h>
 
 #include <asm/system.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
@@ -1418,22 +1419,15 @@ static void apm_event_handler(void)
 
 static void apm_mainloop(void)
 {
-	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
-
-	add_wait_queue(&apm_waitqueue, &wait);
-	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-	for (;;) {
-		schedule_timeout(APM_CHECK_TIMEOUT);
-		if (exit_kapmd)
-			break;
+	do {
+		wait_event_interruptible_timeout(apm_waitqueue,
+				exit_kapmd, APM_CHECK_TIMEOUT);
 		/*
 		 * Ok, check all events, check for idle (and mark us sleeping
 		 * so as not to count towards the load average)..
 		 */
-		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 		apm_event_handler();
-	}
-	remove_wait_queue(&apm_waitqueue, &wait);
+	} while (!exit_kapmd);
 }
 
 static int check_apm_user(struct apm_user *as, const char *func)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] i386/apm: use wait_event_interruptible_timeout()
@ 2005-05-02  6:18 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Aravamudan @ 2005-05-02  6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sfr; +Cc: linux-laptop, Kernel-Janitors

Use wait_event_interruptible_timeout() instead of custom wait-queue.


Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>

--- 2.6.12-rc3/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c	2005-04-29 11:03:03.000000000 -0700
+++ 2.6.12-rc3-dev/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c	2005-05-01 19:02:48.000000000 -0700
@@ -224,6 +224,7 @@
 #include <linux/smp_lock.h>
 #include <linux/dmi.h>
 #include <linux/suspend.h>
+#include <linux/wait.h>
 
 #include <asm/system.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
@@ -1418,22 +1419,15 @@ static void apm_event_handler(void)
 
 static void apm_mainloop(void)
 {
-	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
-
-	add_wait_queue(&apm_waitqueue, &wait);
-	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-	for (;;) {
-		schedule_timeout(APM_CHECK_TIMEOUT);
-		if (exit_kapmd)
-			break;
+	do {
+		wait_event_interruptible_timeout(apm_waitqueue,
+				exit_kapmd, APM_CHECK_TIMEOUT);
 		/*
 		 * Ok, check all events, check for idle (and mark us sleeping
 		 * so as not to count towards the load average)..
 		 */
-		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 		apm_event_handler();
-	}
-	remove_wait_queue(&apm_waitqueue, &wait);
+	} while (!exit_kapmd);
 }
 
 static int check_apm_user(struct apm_user *as, const char *func)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [KJ] [PATCH] ppc/fcc_enet: replace schedule_timeout() with ssleep()
  2005-05-02  6:14 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
@ 2005-05-02  6:26   ` Nishanth Aravamudan
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Aravamudan @ 2005-05-02  6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dmalek; +Cc: Kernel-Janitors, linuxppc-embedded

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 776 bytes --]

I couldn't find an appropriate entry in MAINTAINERS for this patch.

Use ssleep() instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee the task delays
as expected.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>

--- 2.6.12-rc3/arch/ppc/8260_io/fcc_enet.c	2005-04-29 11:03:03.000000000 -0700
+++ 2.6.12-rc3-dev/arch/ppc/8260_io/fcc_enet.c	2005-05-01 19:10:58.000000000 -0700
@@ -1305,12 +1305,11 @@ static void mii_parse_dm9161_scsr(uint m
 
 static void mii_dm9161_wait(uint mii_reg, struct net_device *dev)
 {
-	int timeout = HZ;
+	int timeout_secs = 1;
 
 	/* Davicom takes a bit to come up after a reset,
 	 * so wait here for a bit */
-	set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-	schedule_timeout(timeout);
+	ssleep(timeout_secs);
 }
 
 static phy_info_t phy_info_dm9161 = {

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] ppc/fcc_enet: replace schedule_timeout() with ssleep()
@ 2005-05-02  6:26   ` Nishanth Aravamudan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Aravamudan @ 2005-05-02  6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dmalek; +Cc: Kernel-Janitors, linuxppc-embedded

I couldn't find an appropriate entry in MAINTAINERS for this patch.

Use ssleep() instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee the task delays
as expected.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>

--- 2.6.12-rc3/arch/ppc/8260_io/fcc_enet.c	2005-04-29 11:03:03.000000000 -0700
+++ 2.6.12-rc3-dev/arch/ppc/8260_io/fcc_enet.c	2005-05-01 19:10:58.000000000 -0700
@@ -1305,12 +1305,11 @@ static void mii_parse_dm9161_scsr(uint m
 
 static void mii_dm9161_wait(uint mii_reg, struct net_device *dev)
 {
-	int timeout = HZ;
+	int timeout_secs = 1;
 
 	/* Davicom takes a bit to come up after a reset,
 	 * so wait here for a bit */
-	set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-	schedule_timeout(timeout);
+	ssleep(timeout_secs);
 }
 
 static phy_info_t phy_info_dm9161 = {

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [KJ] [PATCH] net/slip: replace schedule_timeout() with
  2005-05-02  6:14 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
@ 2005-05-02  6:34   ` Nishanth Aravamudan
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Aravamudan @ 2005-05-02  6:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: loz, waltje; +Cc: netdev, Kernel-Janitors

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 572 bytes --]

Use msleep_interruptible() instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee
the task delays as expected.

--- 2.6.12-rc3/drivers/net/slip.c	2005-03-01 23:38:33.000000000 -0800
+++ 2.6.12-rc3-dev/drivers/net/slip.c	2005-05-01 20:53:08.000000000 -0700
@@ -1395,10 +1395,8 @@ static void __exit slip_exit(void)
 	/* First of all: check for active disciplines and hangup them.
 	 */
 	do {
-		if (busy) {
-			set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-			schedule_timeout(HZ / 10);
-		}
+		if (busy)
+			msleep_interruptible(100);
 
 		busy = 0;
 		for (i = 0; i < slip_maxdev; i++) {

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [KJ] [PATCH] net/slip: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep_interruptible()
@ 2005-05-02  6:34   ` Nishanth Aravamudan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Aravamudan @ 2005-05-02  6:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: loz, waltje; +Cc: netdev, Kernel-Janitors

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 572 bytes --]

Use msleep_interruptible() instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee
the task delays as expected.

--- 2.6.12-rc3/drivers/net/slip.c	2005-03-01 23:38:33.000000000 -0800
+++ 2.6.12-rc3-dev/drivers/net/slip.c	2005-05-01 20:53:08.000000000 -0700
@@ -1395,10 +1395,8 @@ static void __exit slip_exit(void)
 	/* First of all: check for active disciplines and hangup them.
 	 */
 	do {
-		if (busy) {
-			set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-			schedule_timeout(HZ / 10);
-		}
+		if (busy)
+			msleep_interruptible(100);
 
 		busy = 0;
 		for (i = 0; i < slip_maxdev; i++) {

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [KJ] [PATCH] i386/apm: use wait_event_interruptible_timeout()
  2005-05-02  6:18 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
@ 2005-05-03 21:40   ` Nishanth Aravamudan
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Aravamudan @ 2005-05-03 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernel-janitors

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1075 bytes --]

On 01.05.2005 [23:18:24 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Use wait_event_interruptible_timeout() instead of custom wait-queue.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
> 
> --- 2.6.12-rc3/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c	2005-04-29 11:03:03.000000000 -0700
> +++ 2.6.12-rc3-dev/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c	2005-05-01 19:02:48.000000000 -0700
> @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@
>  #include <linux/smp_lock.h>
>  #include <linux/dmi.h>
>  #include <linux/suspend.h>
> +#include <linux/wait.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/system.h>
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> @@ -1418,22 +1419,15 @@ static void apm_event_handler(void)
>  
>  static void apm_mainloop(void)
>  {
> -	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
> -
> -	add_wait_queue(&apm_waitqueue, &wait);
> -	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> -	for (;;) {
> -		schedule_timeout(APM_CHECK_TIMEOUT);
> -		if (exit_kapmd)
> -			break;
> +	do {
> +		wait_event_interruptible_timeout(apm_waitqueue,
> +				exit_kapmd, APM_CHECK_TIMEOUT);

Hmm, this will lead to some not so subtle breakage with wait-queues.
Please do not apply.

Thanks,
Nish

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [KJ] [PATCH] i386/apm: use wait_event_interruptible_timeout()
@ 2005-05-03 21:40   ` Nishanth Aravamudan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Aravamudan @ 2005-05-03 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sfr; +Cc: Kernel-Janitors, linux-laptop

On 01.05.2005 [23:18:24 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Use wait_event_interruptible_timeout() instead of custom wait-queue.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
> 
> --- 2.6.12-rc3/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c	2005-04-29 11:03:03.000000000 -0700
> +++ 2.6.12-rc3-dev/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c	2005-05-01 19:02:48.000000000 -0700
> @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@
>  #include <linux/smp_lock.h>
>  #include <linux/dmi.h>
>  #include <linux/suspend.h>
> +#include <linux/wait.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/system.h>
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> @@ -1418,22 +1419,15 @@ static void apm_event_handler(void)
>  
>  static void apm_mainloop(void)
>  {
> -	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
> -
> -	add_wait_queue(&apm_waitqueue, &wait);
> -	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> -	for (;;) {
> -		schedule_timeout(APM_CHECK_TIMEOUT);
> -		if (exit_kapmd)
> -			break;
> +	do {
> +		wait_event_interruptible_timeout(apm_waitqueue,
> +				exit_kapmd, APM_CHECK_TIMEOUT);

Hmm, this will lead to some not so subtle breakage with wait-queues.
Please do not apply.

Thanks,
Nish

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-03 21:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-02  6:14 [KJ] [PATCH] net/3c505: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep() Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-05-02  6:14 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-05-02  6:26 ` [KJ] [PATCH] ppc/fcc_enet: replace schedule_timeout() with ssleep() Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-05-02  6:26   ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-05-02  6:34 ` [KJ] [PATCH] net/slip: replace schedule_timeout() with Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-05-02  6:34   ` [KJ] [PATCH] net/slip: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep_interruptible() Nishanth Aravamudan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-02  6:18 [KJ] [PATCH] i386/apm: use wait_event_interruptible_timeout() Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-05-02  6:18 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-05-03 21:40 ` [KJ] " Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-05-03 21:40   ` Nishanth Aravamudan

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.