* Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention?
@ 2005-06-21 6:50 colin
2005-06-21 8:18 ` David Woodhouse
2005-06-21 8:44 ` Paolo Ornati
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: colin @ 2005-06-21 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi all,
Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention?
Can you summary it?
Regards,
Colin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention?
2005-06-21 6:50 Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention? colin
@ 2005-06-21 8:18 ` David Woodhouse
2005-06-21 8:44 ` Paolo Ornati
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Woodhouse @ 2005-06-21 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: colin; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 14:50 +0800, colin wrote:
> Hi all,
> Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention?
> Can you summary it?
http://www.google.com/search?q=2.6.11.1+release
--
dwmw2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention?
2005-06-21 6:50 Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention? colin
2005-06-21 8:18 ` David Woodhouse
@ 2005-06-21 8:44 ` Paolo Ornati
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Ornati @ 2005-06-21 8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: colin; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:50:12 +0800
"colin" <colin@realtek.com.tw> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention?
> Can you summary it?
http://kerneltrap.org/node/4800
http://kerneltrap.org/node/4803
...
--
Paolo Ornati
Linux 2.6.12 on x86_64
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-21 8:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-06-21 6:50 Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention? colin
2005-06-21 8:18 ` David Woodhouse
2005-06-21 8:44 ` Paolo Ornati
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.