From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] no longer mark MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS as BROKEN and remove broken MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS drivers
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 01:24:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060108002457.GE3774@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1136678409.30348.26.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 12:00:09AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 23:07 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > This patch brings the MTD_SHARP driver back into life and removes the
> > non-compiling MTD_AMDSTD and MTD_JEDEC with everything depending on
> > them.
>
> Please provide further background on your reasoning. I'll enumerate my
> questions to make it easy for you to answer each one fully.
>
> 1. Precisely when were these chip drivers marked obsolete?
Since kernel 2.4.11-pre4, released Thu, 4 Oct 2001 20:47:23 -0700.
> 2. What was the reason for marking them obsolete?
The changelog says:
- David Woodhouse: large MTD and JFFS[2] update
> 3. What are the factors which led you to conclude that _now_ is the time
> to actually remove them?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/12/12/43
> 4. What are the factors which led you to _remove_ the map drivers which
> currently use the obsolete chip drivers, rather than taking the obvious
> alternative solution for those map drivers?
It seems that for one and a half years noone considered it a problem
that they were no longer available...
> dwmw2
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] no longer mark MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS as BROKEN and remove broken MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS drivers
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 01:24:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060108002457.GE3774@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1136678409.30348.26.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 12:00:09AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 23:07 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > This patch brings the MTD_SHARP driver back into life and removes the
> > non-compiling MTD_AMDSTD and MTD_JEDEC with everything depending on
> > them.
>
> Please provide further background on your reasoning. I'll enumerate my
> questions to make it easy for you to answer each one fully.
>
> 1. Precisely when were these chip drivers marked obsolete?
Since kernel 2.4.11-pre4, released Thu, 4 Oct 2001 20:47:23 -0700.
> 2. What was the reason for marking them obsolete?
The changelog says:
- David Woodhouse: large MTD and JFFS[2] update
> 3. What are the factors which led you to conclude that _now_ is the time
> to actually remove them?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/12/12/43
> 4. What are the factors which led you to _remove_ the map drivers which
> currently use the obsolete chip drivers, rather than taking the obvious
> alternative solution for those map drivers?
It seems that for one and a half years noone considered it a problem
that they were no longer available...
> dwmw2
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-08 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-07 22:07 [2.6 patch] no longer mark MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS as BROKEN and remove broken MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS drivers Adrian Bunk
2006-01-07 22:07 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-08 0:00 ` David Woodhouse
2006-01-08 0:00 ` David Woodhouse
2006-01-08 0:24 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-01-08 0:24 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-08 0:38 ` David Woodhouse
2006-01-08 0:38 ` David Woodhouse
2006-01-08 1:45 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-08 1:45 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-08 12:41 ` David Woodhouse
2006-01-08 12:41 ` David Woodhouse
2006-01-08 12:57 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-08 12:57 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-08 13:06 ` David Woodhouse
2006-01-08 13:06 ` David Woodhouse
2006-01-08 14:14 ` [2.6 patch] no longer mark MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS as BROKEN Adrian Bunk
2006-01-08 14:14 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-08 14:24 ` David Woodhouse
2006-01-08 14:24 ` David Woodhouse
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-06 18:14 [2.6 patch] no longer mark MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS as BROKEN and remove broken MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS drivers Adrian Bunk
2006-01-06 18:14 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060108002457.GE3774@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.