[LARTC] PRIO on non-leaf classes?

[LARTC] PRIO on non-leaf classes?

[openswan]

Hello,

I'm using HTB and would like to ask is it correct to put "PRIO" on
non-leaf classes ? I know that on leaf classes it's correct and
determines how the excess bandwidth is distributed among non-leaf classes.

Thanks
Nikolay G.K


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Re: [LARTC] PRIO on non-leaf classes?

[Dmytro O. Redchuk]

On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 03:28:14PM +0200, openswan wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm using HTB and would like to ask is it correct to put "PRIO" on
> non-leaf classes ? I know that on leaf classes it's correct and
> determines how the excess bandwidth is distributed among non-leaf classes.
I believe it's okay, but i didnt experiment much.

((I think of HTB classes as working with tokens, both leaf and non-leaf.))

> 
> Thanks
> Nikolay G.K

-- 
  _,-=._              /|_/|
  `-.}   `=._,.-=-._.,  @ @._,
     `._ _,-.   )      _,.-'
        `    G.m-"^m`m'        Dmytro O. Redchuk

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Re: [LARTC] PRIO on non-leaf classes?

[Andreas Klauer]

On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 03:28:14PM +0200, openswan wrote:
> I'm using HTB and would like to ask is it correct to put "PRIO" on
> non-leaf classes ? I know that on leaf classes it's correct and
> determines how the excess bandwidth is distributed among non-leaf classes.

Depends on what you mean by "PRIO". If you're talking about the 
class parameter prio (in lower-case letters), then it's correct, 
the PRIO QDisc however, can not be attached to anything but the 
device itself (root qdisc) or a leaf class.

Regards
Andreas Klauer
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc