* [LARTC] PRIO on non-leaf classes?
@ 2006-01-25 13:28 openswan
2006-01-25 14:07 ` Dmytro O. Redchuk
2006-01-25 15:00 ` Andreas Klauer
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: openswan @ 2006-01-25 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hello,
I'm using HTB and would like to ask is it correct to put "PRIO" on
non-leaf classes ? I know that on leaf classes it's correct and
determines how the excess bandwidth is distributed among non-leaf classes.
Thanks
Nikolay G.K
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] PRIO on non-leaf classes?
2006-01-25 13:28 [LARTC] PRIO on non-leaf classes? openswan
@ 2006-01-25 14:07 ` Dmytro O. Redchuk
2006-01-25 15:00 ` Andreas Klauer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dmytro O. Redchuk @ 2006-01-25 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 03:28:14PM +0200, openswan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using HTB and would like to ask is it correct to put "PRIO" on
> non-leaf classes ? I know that on leaf classes it's correct and
> determines how the excess bandwidth is distributed among non-leaf classes.
I believe it's okay, but i didnt experiment much.
((I think of HTB classes as working with tokens, both leaf and non-leaf.))
>
> Thanks
> Nikolay G.K
--
_,-=._ /|_/|
`-.} `=._,.-=-._., @ @._,
`._ _,-. ) _,.-'
` G.m-"^m`m' Dmytro O. Redchuk
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] PRIO on non-leaf classes?
2006-01-25 13:28 [LARTC] PRIO on non-leaf classes? openswan
2006-01-25 14:07 ` Dmytro O. Redchuk
@ 2006-01-25 15:00 ` Andreas Klauer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Klauer @ 2006-01-25 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 03:28:14PM +0200, openswan wrote:
> I'm using HTB and would like to ask is it correct to put "PRIO" on
> non-leaf classes ? I know that on leaf classes it's correct and
> determines how the excess bandwidth is distributed among non-leaf classes.
Depends on what you mean by "PRIO". If you're talking about the
class parameter prio (in lower-case letters), then it's correct,
the PRIO QDisc however, can not be attached to anything but the
device itself (root qdisc) or a leaf class.
Regards
Andreas Klauer
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-25 15:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-25 13:28 [LARTC] PRIO on non-leaf classes? openswan
2006-01-25 14:07 ` Dmytro O. Redchuk
2006-01-25 15:00 ` Andreas Klauer
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.