From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org, vojtech@suse.cz
Subject: Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu()
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 10:21:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606191021.03631.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060618171511.e0e6de26.pj@sgi.com>
On Monday 19 June 2006 02:15, Paul Jackson wrote:
>
> Roughly, he was looking to support something resembling the kernel's
> per-cpu data in userland library code for high performance scientific
> number crunching, for things like statistics gathering and perhaps (not
> sure of this) reduce locking costs.
While vgetcpu() can be used for this most likely glibc TLS is already
good enough for this. So it will help, but I don't think it's the primary
motivation.
> I see "x86-64" in the Subject. I don't see why this facility is
> arch-specific. Could it work on any arch, ia64 being the one of
> interest to me?
The implementation is x86-64 specific and optimized for x86-64. You could
probably implement something with the same prototype for IA64 too,
although the internal implementation will likely be very different
(there is nothing x86-64 specific in the prototype)
AFAIK ia64 supports fast system calls so it might be possible to
do a simple implementation without vsyscalls.
> I have some ignorance on your references to "CPUID(1)". I don't recall
> what it is. The only command so named I find on my systems are a
CPUID 1 is a x86 instruction that is one way to implement a user level
vgetcpu on x86.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-19 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-14 7:42 FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu() Andi Kleen
2006-06-14 10:47 ` Alan Cox
2006-06-14 14:54 ` Steve Munroe
2006-06-15 23:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[not found] ` <449029DB.7030505@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <200606141752.02361.ak@suse.de>
2006-06-14 16:30 ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-06-14 17:34 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2006-06-15 18:44 ` Tony Luck
2006-06-16 6:22 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 7:23 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2006-06-16 7:37 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 9:48 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 9:48 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 10:09 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 10:09 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 11:02 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 11:02 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 11:17 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 11:17 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 11:58 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 11:58 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 12:36 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 12:36 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 12:41 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 12:41 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 12:48 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 12:48 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 21:04 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 21:04 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 14:56 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 14:56 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 15:31 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 15:31 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 15:37 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 15:37 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 15:58 ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-06-16 15:58 ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-06-16 16:24 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 16:24 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 16:33 ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-06-16 16:33 ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-06-16 21:12 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 21:12 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 15:36 ` Brent Casavant
2006-06-16 15:36 ` Brent Casavant
2006-06-16 15:40 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 15:40 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 21:15 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 21:15 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 21:19 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 21:19 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 23:40 ` Brent Casavant
2006-06-16 23:40 ` Brent Casavant
2006-06-17 6:58 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-17 6:58 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-17 6:55 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2006-06-17 6:55 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-19 8:42 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-19 8:42 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-19 8:54 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-19 8:54 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 14:54 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 14:54 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-20 8:28 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-20 8:28 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-19 0:15 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-19 8:21 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-06-19 10:09 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-21 1:18 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-21 1:21 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200606191021.03631.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.