All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Zoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@bull.net>
Cc: discuss@x86-64.org, Chase Venters <chase.venters@clientec.com>,
	Brent Casavant <bcasavan@sgi.com>, Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
	vojtech@suse.cz, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu()
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 08:54:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606191054.29543.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44966383.1030006@bull.net>


> Probably I have not explained it correctly:
> - The "information page" (that includes the current CPU no.) is not a
>   per CPU page

If it isn't then you can't figure out the current CPU/node for a thread.

Anyways I think we're talking past each other. Your approach might
even work on ia64 (at least if you're willing to add a lot of cost
to the context switch). You presumably could implement vgetcpu()
internally with an approach like this (although with IA64's fast 
EPC calls it seems a bit pointless) 

It just won't work on x86. 

-Andi

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Zoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@bull.net>
Cc: discuss@x86-64.org, Chase Venters <chase.venters@clientec.com>,
	Brent Casavant <bcasavan@sgi.com>, Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
	vojtech@suse.cz, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu()
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 10:54:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606191054.29543.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44966383.1030006@bull.net>


> Probably I have not explained it correctly:
> - The "information page" (that includes the current CPU no.) is not a
>   per CPU page

If it isn't then you can't figure out the current CPU/node for a thread.

Anyways I think we're talking past each other. Your approach might
even work on ia64 (at least if you're willing to add a lot of cost
to the context switch). You presumably could implement vgetcpu()
internally with an approach like this (although with IA64's fast 
EPC calls it seems a bit pointless) 

It just won't work on x86. 

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-19  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-14  7:42 FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu() Andi Kleen
2006-06-14 10:47 ` Alan Cox
2006-06-14 14:54 ` Steve Munroe
2006-06-15 23:17   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
     [not found] ` <449029DB.7030505@redhat.com>
     [not found]   ` <200606141752.02361.ak@suse.de>
2006-06-14 16:30     ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-06-14 17:34       ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2006-06-15 18:44 ` Tony Luck
2006-06-16  6:22   ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16  7:23     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2006-06-16  7:37       ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16  9:48     ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16  9:48       ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 10:09       ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 10:09         ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 11:02         ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 11:02           ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 11:17           ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 11:17             ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 11:58             ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 11:58               ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 12:36               ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 12:36                 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 12:41                 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 12:41                   ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 12:48                   ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 12:48                     ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 21:04                     ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 21:04                       ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 14:56                 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 14:56                   ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 15:31                   ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 15:31                     ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 15:37                     ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 15:37                       ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 15:58                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-06-16 15:58                         ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-06-16 16:24                         ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 16:24                           ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 16:33                           ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-06-16 16:33                             ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-06-16 21:12                     ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 21:12                       ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 15:36                   ` Brent Casavant
2006-06-16 15:36                     ` Brent Casavant
2006-06-16 15:40                     ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 15:40                       ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 21:15                       ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 21:15                         ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 21:19                       ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 21:19                         ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 23:40                         ` Brent Casavant
2006-06-16 23:40                           ` Brent Casavant
2006-06-17  6:58                           ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-17  6:58                             ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-17  6:55                         ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2006-06-17  6:55                           ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-19  8:42                           ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-19  8:42                             ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-19  8:54                             ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-06-19  8:54                               ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 14:54               ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 14:54                 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-20  8:28                 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-20  8:28                   ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-19  0:15 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-19  8:21   ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-19 10:09     ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-21  1:18     ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-21  1:21       ` Paul Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200606191054.29543.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=Zoltan.Menyhart@bull.net \
    --cc=bcasavan@sgi.com \
    --cc=chase.venters@clientec.com \
    --cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
    --cc=jes@sgi.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.