From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Brent Casavant <bcasavan@sgi.com>
Cc: Zoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@bull.net>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org, vojtech@suse.cz,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu()
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:40:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606161740.18611.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060616102516.A91827@pkunk.americas.sgi.com>
> To this last point, it might be more reasonable to map in a page that
> contained a new structure with a stable ABI, which mirrored some of
> the task_struct information, and likely other useful information as
> needs are identified in the future. In any case, it would be hard
> to beat a single memory read for performance.
That would mean making the context switch and possibly other
things slower.
In general you would need to make a very good case first that all this
complexity is worth it.
> Cache-coloring and kernel bookkeeping effects could be minimized if this
> was provided as an mmaped page from a device driver, used only by
> applications which care.
I don't see what difference that would make. You would still
have the fixed offset problem and doing things on demand often tends
to be even more complex.
-Andi (who thinks these proposals all sound very messy)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Brent Casavant <bcasavan@sgi.com>
Cc: Zoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@bull.net>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org, vojtech@suse.cz,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu()
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 17:40:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606161740.18611.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060616102516.A91827@pkunk.americas.sgi.com>
> To this last point, it might be more reasonable to map in a page that
> contained a new structure with a stable ABI, which mirrored some of
> the task_struct information, and likely other useful information as
> needs are identified in the future. In any case, it would be hard
> to beat a single memory read for performance.
That would mean making the context switch and possibly other
things slower.
In general you would need to make a very good case first that all this
complexity is worth it.
> Cache-coloring and kernel bookkeeping effects could be minimized if this
> was provided as an mmaped page from a device driver, used only by
> applications which care.
I don't see what difference that would make. You would still
have the fixed offset problem and doing things on demand often tends
to be even more complex.
-Andi (who thinks these proposals all sound very messy)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-16 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-14 7:42 FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu() Andi Kleen
2006-06-14 10:47 ` Alan Cox
2006-06-14 14:54 ` Steve Munroe
2006-06-15 23:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[not found] ` <449029DB.7030505@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <200606141752.02361.ak@suse.de>
2006-06-14 16:30 ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-06-14 17:34 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2006-06-15 18:44 ` Tony Luck
2006-06-16 6:22 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 7:23 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2006-06-16 7:37 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 9:48 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 9:48 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 10:09 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 10:09 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 11:02 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 11:02 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 11:17 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 11:17 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 11:58 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 11:58 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 12:36 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 12:36 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 12:41 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 12:41 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 12:48 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 12:48 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 21:04 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 21:04 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 14:56 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 14:56 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 15:31 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 15:31 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 15:37 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 15:37 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 15:58 ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-06-16 15:58 ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-06-16 16:24 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 16:24 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 16:33 ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-06-16 16:33 ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-06-16 21:12 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 21:12 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 15:36 ` Brent Casavant
2006-06-16 15:36 ` Brent Casavant
2006-06-16 15:40 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-06-16 15:40 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 21:15 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 21:15 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 21:19 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 21:19 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 23:40 ` Brent Casavant
2006-06-16 23:40 ` Brent Casavant
2006-06-17 6:58 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-17 6:58 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-17 6:55 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2006-06-17 6:55 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-19 8:42 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-19 8:42 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-19 8:54 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-19 8:54 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 14:54 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 14:54 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-20 8:28 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-20 8:28 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-19 0:15 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-19 8:21 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-19 10:09 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-21 1:18 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-21 1:21 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200606161740.18611.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=Zoltan.Menyhart@bull.net \
--cc=bcasavan@sgi.com \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.