All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] tpm: interrupt clear fix]
@ 2006-07-17 18:35 Kylene Jo Hall
  2006-07-17 21:04 ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kylene Jo Hall @ 2006-07-17 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable
  Cc: Greg KH, torvalds, akpm, Theodore Ts'o, Zwane Mwaikambo,
	Justin Forbes, linux-kernel, Chris Wedgwood, Randy Dunlap,
	Dave Jones, Chuck Wolber, stable, alan, greg

-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Kylene Jo Hall <kjhall@us.ibm.com>
To: linux-os (Dick Johnson) <linux-os@analogic.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, TPM Device Driver List
<tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: interrupt clear fix
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:24:36 -0700
Under stress testing I found that the interrupt is not always cleared.
This is a bug and this patch should go into 2.6.18 and 2.6.17.x.

On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 07:45 -0400, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:

> PCI devices need a final read to flush all pending writes. Whatever
> mb() does, just hides the problem.


Signed-off-by: Kylene Hall <kjhall@us.ibm.com>
---

--- linux-2.6.18-rc1/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c	2006-07-13 14:46:39.727500500 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc1-tpm/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c	2006-07-13 14:47:33.878884750 -0500
@@ -424,6 +424,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tis_int_handler(int i
 	iowrite32(interrupt,
 		  chip->vendor.iobase +
 		  TPM_INT_STATUS(chip->vendor.locality));
+	ioread32(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_INT_STATUS(chip->vendor.locality));
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] tpm: interrupt clear fix]
  2006-07-17 18:35 [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] tpm: interrupt clear fix] Kylene Jo Hall
@ 2006-07-17 21:04 ` Greg KH
  2006-07-17 21:36   ` Kylene Jo Hall
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2006-07-17 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kylene Jo Hall
  Cc: stable, Greg KH, torvalds, akpm, Theodore Ts'o,
	Zwane Mwaikambo, Justin Forbes, linux-kernel, Chris Wedgwood,
	Randy Dunlap, Dave Jones, Chuck Wolber, alan

On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 11:35:20AM -0700, Kylene Jo Hall wrote:
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> From: Kylene Jo Hall <kjhall@us.ibm.com>
> To: linux-os (Dick Johnson) <linux-os@analogic.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, TPM Device Driver List
> <tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>, akpm@osdl.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: interrupt clear fix
> Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:24:36 -0700
> Under stress testing I found that the interrupt is not always cleared.
> This is a bug and this patch should go into 2.6.18 and 2.6.17.x.
> 
> On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 07:45 -0400, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
> 
> > PCI devices need a final read to flush all pending writes. Whatever
> > mb() does, just hides the problem.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kylene Hall <kjhall@us.ibm.com>
> ---
> 
> --- linux-2.6.18-rc1/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c	2006-07-13 14:46:39.727500500 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.18-rc1-tpm/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c	2006-07-13 14:47:33.878884750 -0500
> @@ -424,6 +424,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tis_int_handler(int i
>  	iowrite32(interrupt,
>  		  chip->vendor.iobase +
>  		  TPM_INT_STATUS(chip->vendor.locality));
> +	ioread32(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_INT_STATUS(chip->vendor.locality));
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }

So does this replace the other tpm patch?  Or should we apply both of
them?

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] tpm: interrupt clear fix]
  2006-07-17 21:04 ` Greg KH
@ 2006-07-17 21:36   ` Kylene Jo Hall
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kylene Jo Hall @ 2006-07-17 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg KH
  Cc: stable, Greg KH, torvalds, akpm, Theodore Ts'o,
	Zwane Mwaikambo, Justin Forbes, linux-kernel, Chris Wedgwood,
	Randy Dunlap, Dave Jones, Chuck Wolber, alan

This replaces the previous patch.
Thanks,
Kylie

On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 14:04 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 11:35:20AM -0700, Kylene Jo Hall wrote:
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > From: Kylene Jo Hall <kjhall@us.ibm.com>
> > To: linux-os (Dick Johnson) <linux-os@analogic.com>
> > Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, TPM Device Driver List
> > <tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>, akpm@osdl.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: interrupt clear fix
> > Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:24:36 -0700
> > Under stress testing I found that the interrupt is not always cleared.
> > This is a bug and this patch should go into 2.6.18 and 2.6.17.x.
> > 
> > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 07:45 -0400, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
> > 
> > > PCI devices need a final read to flush all pending writes. Whatever
> > > mb() does, just hides the problem.
> > 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kylene Hall <kjhall@us.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > --- linux-2.6.18-rc1/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c	2006-07-13 14:46:39.727500500 -0500
> > +++ linux-2.6.18-rc1-tpm/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c	2006-07-13 14:47:33.878884750 -0500
> > @@ -424,6 +424,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tis_int_handler(int i
> >  	iowrite32(interrupt,
> >  		  chip->vendor.iobase +
> >  		  TPM_INT_STATUS(chip->vendor.locality));
> > +	ioread32(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_INT_STATUS(chip->vendor.locality));
> >  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >  }
> 
> So does this replace the other tpm patch?  Or should we apply both of
> them?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-07-17 21:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-07-17 18:35 [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] tpm: interrupt clear fix] Kylene Jo Hall
2006-07-17 21:04 ` Greg KH
2006-07-17 21:36   ` Kylene Jo Hall

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.