All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
	sekharan@us.ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	nagar@watson.ibm.com, haveblue@us.ibm.com, pj@sgi.com
Subject: [ RFC, PATCH 4/5 ] CPU controller - deal with dont care groups
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:42:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060804051210.GH27194@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060804050753.GD27194@in.ibm.com>


Deal with task-groups whose bandwidth hasnt been explicitly set by the
administrator. Unallocated CPU bandwidth is equally distributed among such
"don't care" groups.

Signed-off-by : Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>


 include/linux/sched.h |    2 -
 kernel/sched.c        |   82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff -puN kernel/sched.c~cpu_ctlr_handle_dont_cares kernel/sched.c
--- linux-2.6.18-rc3/kernel/sched.c~cpu_ctlr_handle_dont_cares	2006-08-04 08:20:53.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc3-root/kernel/sched.c	2006-08-04 08:31:38.000000000 +0530
@@ -227,6 +227,12 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_grp_rq
 /* task-group object - maintains information about each task-group */
 struct task_grp {
 	int ticks;	/* bandwidth given to the task-group */
+	int left_over_pct;
+	int total_dont_care_grps;
+	int dont_care;          /* Does this group care for its bandwidth ? */
+	struct task_grp *parent;
+	struct list_head dont_care_list;
+	struct list_head list;
 	struct task_grp_rq *rq[NR_CPUS];   /* runqueue pointer for every cpu */
 };
 
@@ -6922,6 +6928,12 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
 	int i, j, k;
 
 	init_task_grp.ticks = -1;     /* Unlimited bandwidth */
+	init_task_grp.left_over_pct = 100;  /* 100% unallocated bandwidth */
+	init_task_grp.parent = NULL;
+	init_task_grp.total_dont_care_grps = 1;	/* init_task_grp itself */
+	init_task_grp.dont_care = 1;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&init_task_grp.dont_care_list);
+	list_add_tail(&init_task_grp.list, &init_task_grp.dont_care_list);
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
 		struct prio_array *array;
@@ -7076,10 +7088,33 @@ void set_curr_task(int cpu, struct task_
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPUMETER
 
+/* Distribute left over bandwidth equally to all "dont care" task groups */
+static void recalc_dontcare(struct task_grp *tg_root)
+{
+	int ticks;
+	struct list_head *entry;
+
+	if (!tg_root->total_dont_care_grps)
+		return;
+
+	ticks = ((tg_root->left_over_pct /
+			 tg_root->total_dont_care_grps) * 5 * HZ) / 100;
+
+	list_for_each(entry, &tg_root->dont_care_list) {
+		struct task_grp *tg;
+		int i;
+
+		tg = list_entry(entry, struct task_grp, list);
+		tg->ticks = ticks;
+		for_each_possible_cpu(i)
+			tg->rq[i]->ticks = tg->ticks;
+	}
+}
+
 /* Allocate runqueue structures for the new task-group */
-void *sched_alloc_group(void)
+void *sched_alloc_group(void *grp_parent)
 {
-	struct task_grp *tg;
+	struct task_grp *tg, *tg_parent = (struct task_grp *)grp_parent;
 	struct task_grp_rq *tgrq;
 	int i;
 
@@ -7088,6 +7123,11 @@ void *sched_alloc_group(void)
 		return NULL;
 
 	tg->ticks = -1;		/* No limit */
+	tg->parent = tg_parent;
+	tg->dont_care = 1;
+	tg->left_over_pct = 100;
+	tg->ticks = -1;		/* No limit */
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tg->dont_care_list);
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
 		tgrq = kzalloc(sizeof(*tgrq), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -7097,6 +7137,15 @@ void *sched_alloc_group(void)
 		task_grp_rq_init(tgrq, tg->ticks);
 	}
 
+	if (tg->parent) {
+		tg->parent->total_dont_care_grps++;
+		list_add_tail(&tg->list, &tg->parent->dont_care_list);
+		recalc_dontcare(tg->parent);
+	} else {
+		tg->total_dont_care_grps = 1;
+		list_add_tail(&tg->list, &tg->dont_care_list);
+	}
+
 	return (void *)tg;
 oom:
 	while (i--)
@@ -7109,9 +7158,18 @@ oom:
 /* Deallocate runqueue structures */
 void sched_dealloc_group(void *grp)
 {
-	struct task_grp *tg = (struct task_grp *)grp;
+	struct task_grp *tg = (struct task_grp *)grp, *tg_root = tg->parent;
 	int i;
 
+	if (!tg_root)
+		tg_root = tg;
+
+	if (tg->dont_care) {
+		tg_root->total_dont_care_grps--;
+		list_del(&tg->list);
+		recalc_dontcare(tg_root);
+	}
+
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
 		kfree(tg->rq[i]);
 
@@ -7121,14 +7179,27 @@ void sched_dealloc_group(void *grp)
 /* Assign quota to this group */
 void sched_assign_quota(void *grp, int quota)
 {
-	struct task_grp *tg = (struct task_grp *)grp;
+	struct task_grp *tg = (struct task_grp *)grp, *tg_root = tg->parent;
+	int old_quota = 0;
 	int i;
 
+	if (!tg_root)
+		tg_root = tg;
+
+	if (tg->dont_care) {
+		tg->dont_care = 0;
+		tg_root->total_dont_care_grps--;
+		list_del(&tg->list);
+	} else
+		old_quota = (tg->ticks * 100) / (5 * HZ);
+
+	tg_root->left_over_pct -= (quota - old_quota);
 	tg->ticks = (quota * 5 * HZ) / 100;
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
 		tg->rq[i]->ticks = tg->ticks;
 
+	recalc_dontcare(tg_root);
 }
 
 /* Return assigned quota for this group */
@@ -7137,6 +7208,9 @@ int sched_get_quota(void *grp)
 	struct task_grp *tg = (struct task_grp *)grp;
 	int quota;
 
+	if (tg->dont_care)
+		 return 0;
+
 	quota = (tg->ticks * 100) / (5 * HZ);
 
 	return quota;
diff -puN include/linux/sched.h~cpu_ctlr_handle_dont_cares include/linux/sched.h
--- linux-2.6.18-rc3/include/linux/sched.h~cpu_ctlr_handle_dont_cares	2006-08-04 08:31:56.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc3-root/include/linux/sched.h	2006-08-04 08:32:07.000000000 +0530
@@ -1607,7 +1607,7 @@ static inline int try_to_freeze(void) { 
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPUMETER
 struct task_grp_ops {
-	void *(*alloc_group)(void);
+	void *(*alloc_group)(void *grp_parent);
 	void (*dealloc_group)(void *grp);
 	void (*assign_quota)(void *grp, int quota);
 	void (*move_task)(struct task_struct *tsk, void *old, void *new);

_
-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-- 
Regards,
vatsa

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-08-04  5:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-04  5:07 [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04  5:09 ` [ RFC, PATCH 1/5 ] CPU controller - base changes Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04  7:35   ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-04 11:18     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04 14:34   ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-04 14:50     ` Balbir Singh
2006-08-04 14:51     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04  5:10 ` [ RFC, PATCH 2/5 ] CPU controller - Define group operations Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04 23:10   ` Jiri Slaby
2006-08-04  5:11 ` [ RFC, PATCH 3/5 ] CPU controller - deal with movement of tasks Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04  5:12 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2006-08-04  5:13 ` [ RFC, PATCH 5/5 ] CPU controller - interface with cpusets Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04  5:36 ` [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller Andrew Morton
2006-08-04  5:42   ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-04  9:49     ` Alan Cox
2006-08-04 11:41       ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04 14:51         ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-04 15:31           ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04 16:03             ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-04 17:02               ` [ProbableSpam] " Shailabh Nagar
2006-08-04 18:27               ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-04 19:11                 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-08-04 19:24                   ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-07  7:19                 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-07 17:14                   ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-08  7:17                     ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-08 17:16                       ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-04 17:50           ` Martin Bligh
2006-08-07  7:25             ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-07 14:34               ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-08-07 16:33                 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-07 18:31                   ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-07 18:43                     ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-07 19:00                       ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-07 19:46                         ` Martin Bligh
2006-08-08 14:19                           ` memory resource accounting (was Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller) Nick Piggin
2006-08-08 14:57                             ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-08 15:22                               ` Nick Piggin
2006-08-09 13:43                                 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-08 17:08                             ` Martin Bligh
2006-08-09  1:54                               ` Nick Piggin
2006-08-08 17:34                             ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-09  4:33                             ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-09  6:00                               ` Magnus Damm
2006-08-09  6:06                                 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-09  6:56                             ` Andrey Savochkin
2006-08-08  7:19                     ` [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-04 16:16         ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-04 16:49           ` [ProbableSpam] " Shailabh Nagar
2006-08-04 17:03             ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-04 18:17               ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-08-07  7:23               ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-04 14:57       ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-04  5:58   ` Paul Jackson
2006-08-04  6:02   ` Paul Jackson
2006-08-04  6:16     ` Paul Jackson
2006-08-04  6:20   ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-04  6:31     ` Paul Jackson
2006-08-04  6:37       ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-04  6:49         ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-04  6:45     ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-04  7:10       ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-04  7:24         ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-04 19:10       ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-04  6:56   ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04  7:13     ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-04 11:16       ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04 18:51         ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-04 14:20   ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-04 14:35     ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-04 15:29     ` [ProbableSpam] " Shailabh Nagar
2006-08-07  7:29       ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-07  9:30         ` Paul Jackson
2006-08-07 15:58           ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-07 16:10           ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-07 17:15             ` Paul Jackson
2006-08-07 18:19               ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-05  3:30   ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060804051210.GH27194@in.ibm.com \
    --to=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dev@openvz.org \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nagar@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=sam@vilain.net \
    --cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.