All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
To: Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	vatsa@in.ibm.com, mingo@elte.hu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au,
	sam@vilain.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvz.org,
	efault@gmx.de, balbir@in.ibm.com, sekharan@us.ibm.com,
	haveblue@us.ibm.com, pj@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [ProbableSpam] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu  controller
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 11:29:51 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44D6EBEF.9010804@sw.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44D367F3.8060108@watson.ibm.com>

>>3. I also don't understand why normal binary interface like system call
>>is not used.
>>  We have set_uid, sys_setrlimit and it works pretty good, does it?
> 
> 
> If there are no hierarchies, a syscall interface is fine since the namespace
> for the task-group is flat (so one can export to userspace either a number or a
> string as a handle to that task-group for operations like create, delete,
> set limit, get usage, etc)
syscalls work fine here as well. you need to specify parent_id and new_id for creation.
that's all. we have such an interfaces for heirarchical CPU scheduler.

> A filesystem based interface is useful when you have hierarchies (as resource
> groups and cpusets do) since it naturally defines a convenient to use
> hierarchical namespace.
but it is not much convinient for applications then.

Thanks,
Kirill


  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-07  7:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-04  5:07 [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04  5:09 ` [ RFC, PATCH 1/5 ] CPU controller - base changes Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04  7:35   ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-04 11:18     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04 14:34   ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-04 14:50     ` Balbir Singh
2006-08-04 14:51     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04  5:10 ` [ RFC, PATCH 2/5 ] CPU controller - Define group operations Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04 23:10   ` Jiri Slaby
2006-08-04  5:11 ` [ RFC, PATCH 3/5 ] CPU controller - deal with movement of tasks Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04  5:12 ` [ RFC, PATCH 4/5 ] CPU controller - deal with dont care groups Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04  5:13 ` [ RFC, PATCH 5/5 ] CPU controller - interface with cpusets Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04  5:36 ` [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller Andrew Morton
2006-08-04  5:42   ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-04  9:49     ` Alan Cox
2006-08-04 11:41       ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04 14:51         ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-04 15:31           ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04 16:03             ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-04 17:02               ` [ProbableSpam] " Shailabh Nagar
2006-08-04 18:27               ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-04 19:11                 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-08-04 19:24                   ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-07  7:19                 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-07 17:14                   ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-08  7:17                     ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-08 17:16                       ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-04 17:50           ` Martin Bligh
2006-08-07  7:25             ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-07 14:34               ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-08-07 16:33                 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-07 18:31                   ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-07 18:43                     ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-07 19:00                       ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-07 19:46                         ` Martin Bligh
2006-08-08 14:19                           ` memory resource accounting (was Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller) Nick Piggin
2006-08-08 14:57                             ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-08 15:22                               ` Nick Piggin
2006-08-09 13:43                                 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-08 17:08                             ` Martin Bligh
2006-08-09  1:54                               ` Nick Piggin
2006-08-08 17:34                             ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-09  4:33                             ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-09  6:00                               ` Magnus Damm
2006-08-09  6:06                                 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-09  6:56                             ` Andrey Savochkin
2006-08-08  7:19                     ` [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-04 16:16         ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-04 16:49           ` [ProbableSpam] " Shailabh Nagar
2006-08-04 17:03             ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-04 18:17               ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-08-07  7:23               ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-04 14:57       ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-04  5:58   ` Paul Jackson
2006-08-04  6:02   ` Paul Jackson
2006-08-04  6:16     ` Paul Jackson
2006-08-04  6:20   ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-04  6:31     ` Paul Jackson
2006-08-04  6:37       ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-04  6:49         ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-04  6:45     ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-04  7:10       ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-04  7:24         ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-04 19:10       ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-04  6:56   ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04  7:13     ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-04 11:16       ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-04 18:51         ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-04 14:20   ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-04 14:35     ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-04 15:29     ` [ProbableSpam] " Shailabh Nagar
2006-08-07  7:29       ` Kirill Korotaev [this message]
2006-08-07  9:30         ` Paul Jackson
2006-08-07 15:58           ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-07 16:10           ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-07 17:15             ` Paul Jackson
2006-08-07 18:19               ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-05  3:30   ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44D6EBEF.9010804@sw.ru \
    --to=dev@sw.ru \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dev@openvz.org \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nagar@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=sam@vilain.net \
    --cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.