* exclude's effect with multiple rules
@ 2006-08-25 22:04 Michael C Thompson
2006-08-26 0:50 ` Steve Grubb
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael C Thompson @ 2006-08-25 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Audit
Hey all,
So if I have the following two rules, what should be expected behaviour?
auditctl -a entry,always -S chmod
auditctl -a exclude,always -S all
... Assume we can change the ordering.
Thanks,
Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: exclude's effect with multiple rules
2006-08-25 22:04 exclude's effect with multiple rules Michael C Thompson
@ 2006-08-26 0:50 ` Steve Grubb
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Steve Grubb @ 2006-08-26 0:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-audit
On Friday 25 August 2006 18:04, Michael C Thompson wrote:
> So if I have the following two rules, what should be expected behaviour?
>
> auditctl -a entry,always -S chmod
> auditctl -a exclude,always -S all
The expected behavior is that rule 1 is accepted and rule 2 produces an error
and is rejected.
-Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-08-26 0:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-08-25 22:04 exclude's effect with multiple rules Michael C Thompson
2006-08-26 0:50 ` Steve Grubb
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.