From: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas)
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Yanmin Zhang <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
linux-pci maillist <linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Subject: Re: pci error recovery procedure
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:01:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060906200155.GL7139@austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1157506016.20092.386.camel@ymzhang-perf.sh.intel.com>
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:26:56AM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > > The
> > > error_detected of the drivers in the latest kernel who support err handlers
> > > always returns PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET. They are typical examples.
> >
> > Just because the current drivers do it this way does not mean that this is
> > the best way to do things.
>
> If it's not the best way, why did you choose to reset slot for e1000/e100/ipr
> error handlers? They are typical widely-used devices. To make it easier to
> add error handlers?
I did it that way just to get going, get something working. I do not
have hardware specs for any of these devices, and do not have much of
an idea of what they are capable of; the recovery code I wrote is of
"brute force, hit it with a hammer"-nature. Driver writers who
know thier hardware well, and are interested in a more refined
approach are encouraged to actualy use a more refined approach.
--linas
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas)
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
linux-pci maillist <linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
Yanmin Zhang <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com>
Subject: Re: pci error recovery procedure
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:01:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060906200155.GL7139@austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1157506016.20092.386.camel@ymzhang-perf.sh.intel.com>
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:26:56AM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > > The
> > > error_detected of the drivers in the latest kernel who support err handlers
> > > always returns PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET. They are typical examples.
> >
> > Just because the current drivers do it this way does not mean that this is
> > the best way to do things.
>
> If it's not the best way, why did you choose to reset slot for e1000/e100/ipr
> error handlers? They are typical widely-used devices. To make it easier to
> add error handlers?
I did it that way just to get going, get something working. I do not
have hardware specs for any of these devices, and do not have much of
an idea of what they are capable of; the recovery code I wrote is of
"brute force, hit it with a hammer"-nature. Driver writers who
know thier hardware well, and are interested in a more refined
approach are encouraged to actualy use a more refined approach.
--linas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-06 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1157008212.20092.36.camel@ymzhang-perf.sh.intel.com>
2006-08-31 17:50 ` pci error recovery procedure Linas Vepstas
2006-09-01 3:33 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-09-01 21:25 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-09-01 21:25 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-09-04 5:47 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-09-04 5:47 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-09-04 9:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-04 9:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-05 2:32 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-09-05 2:32 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-09-05 19:01 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-09-05 19:01 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-09-06 1:26 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-09-06 1:26 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-09-06 20:01 ` Linas Vepstas [this message]
2006-09-06 20:01 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-09-07 1:56 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-09-07 1:56 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-09-05 18:50 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-09-05 18:50 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-09-05 21:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-05 21:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-06 1:35 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-09-06 1:35 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-09-05 19:17 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-09-05 19:17 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-09-06 2:04 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-09-06 2:04 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-09-06 20:39 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-09-06 20:39 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-09-07 3:18 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-09-07 3:18 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-09-12 19:38 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-09-12 19:38 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-09-01 3:42 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-09-01 3:42 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-09-01 9:04 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-09-01 9:04 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-09-01 21:32 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-09-01 21:32 ` Linas Vepstas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060906200155.GL7139@austin.ibm.com \
--to=linas@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=rajesh.shah@intel.com \
--cc=yanmin.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.