From: Andi Drebes <lists-receive@programmierforen.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:41:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200706122041.06252.lists-receive@programmierforen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706101544.35463.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
First off: sorry for my late answer.
> I agree the ACPI CA is a nuisance. But in this case, we're making
> a mountain out of a molehill. I suspect that if somebody spent the
> 15 minutes to make the ARRAY_SIZE patch work in both the Linux ACPI CA
> and the generic Intel one and license it appropriately, Len would
> happily apply the patch.
I hope I got everything right. Here's what I understood so far:
The ACPI Subsystem in the kernel is derived from intel sources. I searched
the web for information about that and finally found
http://www.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads.htm
Is that the right one? So what I would have to do in order to
"make the ARRAY_SIZE patch work in both the Linux ACPI CA
and the generic Intel one" is to modify those sources aswell,
send a patch to Intel and another one back to the
lkml.
Is that right? Or am I totally wrong?
Cheers,
Andi
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andi Drebes <lists-receive@programmierforen.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations replaced with ARRAY_SIZE
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:41:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200706122041.06252.lists-receive@programmierforen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706101544.35463.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
First off: sorry for my late answer.
> I agree the ACPI CA is a nuisance. But in this case, we're making
> a mountain out of a molehill. I suspect that if somebody spent the
> 15 minutes to make the ARRAY_SIZE patch work in both the Linux ACPI CA
> and the generic Intel one and license it appropriately, Len would
> happily apply the patch.
I hope I got everything right. Here's what I understood so far:
The ACPI Subsystem in the kernel is derived from intel sources. I searched
the web for information about that and finally found
http://www.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads.htm
Is that the right one? So what I would have to do in order to
"make the ARRAY_SIZE patch work in both the Linux ACPI CA
and the generic Intel one" is to modify those sources aswell,
send a patch to Intel and another one back to the
lkml.
Is that right? Or am I totally wrong?
Cheers,
Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-12 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-26 10:39 [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations Andi Drebes
2007-05-26 10:39 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations replaced with ARRAY_SIZE Andi Drebes
2007-05-26 11:28 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-26 11:28 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations replaced with ARRAY_SIZE Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-26 13:53 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations Andi Drebes
2007-05-26 13:53 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations replaced with ARRAY_SIZE Andi Drebes
2007-05-26 11:37 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations Richard Knutsson
2007-05-26 11:37 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations replaced with ARRAY_SIZE Richard Knutsson
2007-05-26 13:58 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations Andi Drebes
2007-05-26 13:58 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations replaced with ARRAY_SIZE Andi Drebes
2007-05-30 19:25 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations Len Brown
2007-05-30 19:25 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations replaced with ARRAY_SIZE Len Brown
2007-05-31 9:56 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-31 9:56 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations replaced with ARRAY_SIZE Christoph Hellwig
2007-06-10 10:57 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations Pavel Machek
2007-06-10 10:57 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations replaced with ARRAY_SIZE Pavel Machek
2007-06-10 21:44 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations Bjorn Helgaas
2007-06-10 21:44 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations replaced with ARRAY_SIZE Bjorn Helgaas
2007-06-12 18:41 ` Andi Drebes [this message]
2007-06-12 18:41 ` Andi Drebes
2007-06-12 18:53 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations Bjorn Helgaas
2007-06-12 18:53 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations replaced with ARRAY_SIZE Bjorn Helgaas
2007-06-13 21:21 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations Andi Drebes
2007-06-13 21:21 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations replaced with ARRAY_SIZE Andi Drebes
2007-06-15 17:56 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations Andi Drebes
2007-06-15 17:56 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations replaced with ARRAY_SIZE Andi Drebes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200706122041.06252.lists-receive@programmierforen.de \
--to=lists-receive@programmierforen.de \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.