From: Domen Puncer <domen.puncer@telargo.com>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Sylvain Munaut <tnt@246tnt.com>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc clk.h interface for platforms
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:12:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070713091203.GE11476@nd47.coderock.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070711203454.GC2301@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 11/07/07 21:34 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:02:54AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Wednesday 11 July 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:56:58AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > > > > Umm, this is about the fifth almost identical implementation of
> > > > > the clk_ functions. Please, please put it into common code.
> > > > >
> > > > > And talk to the mips folks which just got a similar comment from me.
> > > >
> > > > You mean like a lib/clock.c core, rather than an opsvector?
> > >
> > > I mean an ops vector and surrounding wrappers. Every architecture
> > > is reimplementing their own dispatch table which is rather annoying.
> >
> > ARM doesn't. :)
> >
> > But then, nobody expects one kernel to support more than one
> > vendor's ARM chips; or usually, more than one generation of
> > that vendor's chips. So any dispatch table is specific to
> > a given platform, and tuned to its quirks. Not much to share
> > between OMAP and AT91, for example, except in some cases maybe
> > an arm926ejs block.
>
> And also the information stored within a 'struct clk' is very platform
> dependent. In the most basic situation, 'struct clk' may not actually
> be a structure, but the clock rate. All functions with the exception of
> clk_get() and clk_get_rate() could well be no-ops, clk_get() just returns
> the 'struct clk' representing the rate and 'clk_get_rate' returns that
> as an integer.
>
> More complex setups might want 'struct clk' to contain the address of a
> clock enable register, the bit position to enable that clock source, the
> clock rate, a refcount, and so on, all of which would be utterly useless
> for a platform which had fixed rate clocks.
The patch that triggered this discussion is at the end.
It doesn't make any assumption on struct clk, it's just a
wrapper around functions from clk.h.
Point of this patch was to abstract exported functions, since
arch/powerpc/ can support multiple platfroms in one binary.
>
> > I've not seen a solid proposal for such a thing, and it's not
> > clear to me how that would play with with older code (e.g. any
> > of the ARM implementations).
>
> If people are implementing their own incompatible changes without reference
> to the API they're invalid implementations as far as I'm concerned. If
> they can't bothered to lift a finger to even _talk_ to me about their
> requirements they just don't have any say concerning any future
> developments IMO.
My changes were implemented according to clk.h API.
And honestly, I just wanted to rework clocks in some SPI driver and
others made me do all the clk work. ;-)
Domen
>
> IOW, talk to me and I'll talk back. Ignore me and I'll ignore them.
>
> --
> Russell King
> Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
> maintainer of:
clk interface for arch/powerpc, platforms should fill
clk_functions.
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen.puncer@telargo.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile | 3 -
arch/powerpc/kernel/clock.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/asm-powerpc/clk_interface.h | 20 ++++++++
3 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: work-powerpc.git/arch/powerpc/kernel/clock.c
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ work-powerpc.git/arch/powerpc/kernel/clock.c
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+/*
+ * Dummy clk implementations for powerpc.
+ * These need to be overridden in platform code.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <asm/clk_interface.h>
+
+struct clk_interface clk_functions;
+
+struct clk *clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
+{
+ if (clk_functions.clk_get)
+ return clk_functions.clk_get(dev, id);
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_get);
+
+void clk_put(struct clk *clk)
+{
+ if (clk_functions.clk_put)
+ clk_functions.clk_put(clk);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_put);
+
+int clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
+{
+ if (clk_functions.clk_enable)
+ return clk_functions.clk_enable(clk);
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_enable);
+
+void clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
+{
+ if (clk_functions.clk_disable)
+ clk_functions.clk_disable(clk);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_disable);
+
+unsigned long clk_get_rate(struct clk *clk)
+{
+ if (clk_functions.clk_get_rate)
+ return clk_functions.clk_get_rate(clk);
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_get_rate);
+
+long clk_round_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
+{
+ if (clk_functions.clk_round_rate)
+ return clk_functions.clk_round_rate(clk, rate);
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_round_rate);
+
+int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
+{
+ if (clk_functions.clk_set_rate)
+ return clk_functions.clk_set_rate(clk, rate);
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_set_rate);
+
+struct clk *clk_get_parent(struct clk *clk)
+{
+ if (clk_functions.clk_get_parent)
+ return clk_functions.clk_get_parent(clk);
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_get_parent);
+
+int clk_set_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
+{
+ if (clk_functions.clk_set_parent)
+ return clk_functions.clk_set_parent(clk, parent);
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_set_parent);
Index: work-powerpc.git/include/asm-powerpc/clk_interface.h
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ work-powerpc.git/include/asm-powerpc/clk_interface.h
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+#ifndef __ASM_POWERPC_CLK_INTERFACE_H
+#define __ASM_POWERPC_CLK_INTERFACE_H
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+
+struct clk_interface {
+ struct clk* (*clk_get) (struct device *dev, const char *id);
+ int (*clk_enable) (struct clk *clk);
+ void (*clk_disable) (struct clk *clk);
+ unsigned long (*clk_get_rate) (struct clk *clk);
+ void (*clk_put) (struct clk *clk);
+ long (*clk_round_rate) (struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate);
+ int (*clk_set_rate) (struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate);
+ int (*clk_set_parent) (struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent);
+ struct clk* (*clk_get_parent) (struct clk *clk);
+};
+
+extern struct clk_interface clk_functions;
+
+#endif /* __ASM_POWERPC_CLK_INTERFACE_H */
Index: work-powerpc.git/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
===================================================================
--- work-powerpc.git.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
+++ work-powerpc.git/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
@@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ endif
obj-y := semaphore.o cputable.o ptrace.o syscalls.o \
irq.o align.o signal_32.o pmc.o vdso.o \
- init_task.o process.o systbl.o idle.o
+ init_task.o process.o systbl.o idle.o \
+ clock.o
obj-y += vdso32/
obj-$(CONFIG_PPC64) += setup_64.o binfmt_elf32.o sys_ppc32.o \
signal_64.o ptrace32.o \
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Domen Puncer <domen.puncer@telargo.com>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc clk.h interface for platforms
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:12:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070713091203.GE11476@nd47.coderock.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070711203454.GC2301@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 11/07/07 21:34 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:02:54AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Wednesday 11 July 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:56:58AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > > > > Umm, this is about the fifth almost identical implementation of
> > > > > the clk_ functions. Please, please put it into common code.
> > > > >
> > > > > And talk to the mips folks which just got a similar comment from me.
> > > >
> > > > You mean like a lib/clock.c core, rather than an opsvector?
> > >
> > > I mean an ops vector and surrounding wrappers. Every architecture
> > > is reimplementing their own dispatch table which is rather annoying.
> >
> > ARM doesn't. :)
> >
> > But then, nobody expects one kernel to support more than one
> > vendor's ARM chips; or usually, more than one generation of
> > that vendor's chips. So any dispatch table is specific to
> > a given platform, and tuned to its quirks. Not much to share
> > between OMAP and AT91, for example, except in some cases maybe
> > an arm926ejs block.
>
> And also the information stored within a 'struct clk' is very platform
> dependent. In the most basic situation, 'struct clk' may not actually
> be a structure, but the clock rate. All functions with the exception of
> clk_get() and clk_get_rate() could well be no-ops, clk_get() just returns
> the 'struct clk' representing the rate and 'clk_get_rate' returns that
> as an integer.
>
> More complex setups might want 'struct clk' to contain the address of a
> clock enable register, the bit position to enable that clock source, the
> clock rate, a refcount, and so on, all of which would be utterly useless
> for a platform which had fixed rate clocks.
The patch that triggered this discussion is at the end.
It doesn't make any assumption on struct clk, it's just a
wrapper around functions from clk.h.
Point of this patch was to abstract exported functions, since
arch/powerpc/ can support multiple platfroms in one binary.
>
> > I've not seen a solid proposal for such a thing, and it's not
> > clear to me how that would play with with older code (e.g. any
> > of the ARM implementations).
>
> If people are implementing their own incompatible changes without reference
> to the API they're invalid implementations as far as I'm concerned. If
> they can't bothered to lift a finger to even _talk_ to me about their
> requirements they just don't have any say concerning any future
> developments IMO.
My changes were implemented according to clk.h API.
And honestly, I just wanted to rework clocks in some SPI driver and
others made me do all the clk work. ;-)
Domen
>
> IOW, talk to me and I'll talk back. Ignore me and I'll ignore them.
>
> --
> Russell King
> Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
> maintainer of:
clk interface for arch/powerpc, platforms should fill
clk_functions.
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen.puncer@telargo.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile | 3 -
arch/powerpc/kernel/clock.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/asm-powerpc/clk_interface.h | 20 ++++++++
3 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: work-powerpc.git/arch/powerpc/kernel/clock.c
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ work-powerpc.git/arch/powerpc/kernel/clock.c
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+/*
+ * Dummy clk implementations for powerpc.
+ * These need to be overridden in platform code.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <asm/clk_interface.h>
+
+struct clk_interface clk_functions;
+
+struct clk *clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
+{
+ if (clk_functions.clk_get)
+ return clk_functions.clk_get(dev, id);
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_get);
+
+void clk_put(struct clk *clk)
+{
+ if (clk_functions.clk_put)
+ clk_functions.clk_put(clk);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_put);
+
+int clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
+{
+ if (clk_functions.clk_enable)
+ return clk_functions.clk_enable(clk);
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_enable);
+
+void clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
+{
+ if (clk_functions.clk_disable)
+ clk_functions.clk_disable(clk);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_disable);
+
+unsigned long clk_get_rate(struct clk *clk)
+{
+ if (clk_functions.clk_get_rate)
+ return clk_functions.clk_get_rate(clk);
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_get_rate);
+
+long clk_round_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
+{
+ if (clk_functions.clk_round_rate)
+ return clk_functions.clk_round_rate(clk, rate);
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_round_rate);
+
+int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
+{
+ if (clk_functions.clk_set_rate)
+ return clk_functions.clk_set_rate(clk, rate);
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_set_rate);
+
+struct clk *clk_get_parent(struct clk *clk)
+{
+ if (clk_functions.clk_get_parent)
+ return clk_functions.clk_get_parent(clk);
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_get_parent);
+
+int clk_set_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
+{
+ if (clk_functions.clk_set_parent)
+ return clk_functions.clk_set_parent(clk, parent);
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_set_parent);
Index: work-powerpc.git/include/asm-powerpc/clk_interface.h
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ work-powerpc.git/include/asm-powerpc/clk_interface.h
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+#ifndef __ASM_POWERPC_CLK_INTERFACE_H
+#define __ASM_POWERPC_CLK_INTERFACE_H
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+
+struct clk_interface {
+ struct clk* (*clk_get) (struct device *dev, const char *id);
+ int (*clk_enable) (struct clk *clk);
+ void (*clk_disable) (struct clk *clk);
+ unsigned long (*clk_get_rate) (struct clk *clk);
+ void (*clk_put) (struct clk *clk);
+ long (*clk_round_rate) (struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate);
+ int (*clk_set_rate) (struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate);
+ int (*clk_set_parent) (struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent);
+ struct clk* (*clk_get_parent) (struct clk *clk);
+};
+
+extern struct clk_interface clk_functions;
+
+#endif /* __ASM_POWERPC_CLK_INTERFACE_H */
Index: work-powerpc.git/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
===================================================================
--- work-powerpc.git.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
+++ work-powerpc.git/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
@@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ endif
obj-y := semaphore.o cputable.o ptrace.o syscalls.o \
irq.o align.o signal_32.o pmc.o vdso.o \
- init_task.o process.o systbl.o idle.o
+ init_task.o process.o systbl.o idle.o \
+ clock.o
obj-y += vdso32/
obj-$(CONFIG_PPC64) += setup_64.o binfmt_elf32.o sys_ppc32.o \
signal_64.o ptrace32.o \
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-13 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-11 9:31 [PATCH 0/3] clock (clk.h) framework for mpc52xx Domen Puncer
2007-07-11 9:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc clk.h interface for platforms Domen Puncer
2007-07-11 10:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-11 10:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-11 15:56 ` David Brownell
2007-07-11 15:56 ` David Brownell
2007-07-11 16:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-11 16:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-11 17:02 ` David Brownell
2007-07-11 17:02 ` David Brownell
2007-07-11 20:34 ` Russell King
2007-07-11 20:34 ` Russell King
2007-07-11 20:52 ` David Brownell
2007-07-11 20:52 ` David Brownell
2007-07-13 9:12 ` Domen Puncer [this message]
2007-07-13 9:12 ` Domen Puncer
2007-08-01 7:28 ` Generic clk.h wrappers? [Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc clk.h interface for platforms] Domen Puncer
2007-08-01 7:28 ` Domen Puncer
2007-08-01 12:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-08-01 12:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-08-02 23:32 ` David Brownell
2007-08-02 23:32 ` David Brownell
2007-08-03 8:36 ` Russell King
2007-08-03 8:36 ` Russell King
2007-08-06 6:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc clk.h interface for platforms Domen Puncer
2007-09-19 3:47 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-09-19 5:11 ` Domen Puncer
2007-09-20 5:07 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-09-20 14:00 ` [PATCH 1/3 v2] " Domen Puncer
2007-07-11 9:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] mpc52xx clk.h interface Domen Puncer
2007-07-11 9:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] mpc52xx_psc_spi: use clk.h subsystem Domen Puncer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070713091203.GE11476@nd47.coderock.org \
--to=domen.puncer@telargo.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tnt@246tnt.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.