All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@acm.org>
To: bzolnier@gmail.com
Cc: jens.axboe@oracle.com, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.orgfujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: block/bsg.c
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 07:26:49 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070718072644F.tomof@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200707172252.25729.bzolnier@gmail.com>

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: block/bsg.c
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:52:25 +0200

> /*
>  * TODO
>  *      - Should this get merged, block/scsi_ioctl.c will be migrated into
>  *        this file. To keep maintenance down, it's easier to have them
>  *        seperated right now.
>  *
>  */
> 
> This TODO should be fixed/removed.

Yeah, this should be removed now. I'll do.


> Firstly bsg got merged. ;)  Moreover bsg depends on SCSI and scsi_ioctl doesn't.
> Even if SCSI dependency is fixed bsg requires block driver to have struct
> class devices which is not a case for scsi_ioctl.
> 
> ...
> 
> static struct bsg_device *__bsg_get_device(int minor)
> {
>         struct hlist_head *list = &bsg_device_list[bsg_list_idx(minor)];
> 
> bsg_device_list[] access should be done under bsg_mutex lock.
> 
> May not be a problem currently because of lock_kernel but worth fixing anyway.
> 
>         struct bsg_device *bd = NULL;
>         struct hlist_node *entry;
> 
>         mutex_lock(&bsg_mutex);
> 

They were fixed. Please check the latest code:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-2.6-block.git bsg

We wait for Linus to pull from it.


> static int
> bsg_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>           unsigned long arg)
> {
> ...
>         case SCSI_IOCTL_SEND_COMMAND: {
> 
> Do we really want to add support for this *deprecated* ioctl to
> the *new* and shiny bsg driver?
> 
>                 void __user *uarg = (void __user *) arg;
>                 return scsi_cmd_ioctl(file, bd->queue, NULL, cmd, uarg);
>         }

We might remove it.


> int bsg_register_queue(struct request_queue *q, const char *name)
> {
> ...
>         memset(bcd, 0, sizeof(*bcd));
> ...
>         dev = MKDEV(BSG_MAJOR, bcd->minor);
>         class_dev = class_device_create(bsg_class, NULL, dev, bcd->dev, "%s", name);
> 
> bcd->dev is always 0 (NULL).
> 
> Is it OK to pass NULL struct device *dev argument to class_device_create()?

It's ok, I guess.


> It should be fixed by either removing bcd->dev or by setting it to something
> other than zero.
> 
> ...
> 
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Jens Axboe");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Block layer SGSI generic (sg) driver");
> 
> SGSI? :)

It was fixed in the latest code.


Thanks,

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@acm.org>
To: bzolnier@gmail.com
Cc: jens.axboe@oracle.com, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: block/bsg.c
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 07:26:49 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070718072644F.tomof@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200707172252.25729.bzolnier@gmail.com>

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: block/bsg.c
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:52:25 +0200

> /*
>  * TODO
>  *      - Should this get merged, block/scsi_ioctl.c will be migrated into
>  *        this file. To keep maintenance down, it's easier to have them
>  *        seperated right now.
>  *
>  */
> 
> This TODO should be fixed/removed.

Yeah, this should be removed now. I'll do.


> Firstly bsg got merged. ;)  Moreover bsg depends on SCSI and scsi_ioctl doesn't.
> Even if SCSI dependency is fixed bsg requires block driver to have struct
> class devices which is not a case for scsi_ioctl.
> 
> ...
> 
> static struct bsg_device *__bsg_get_device(int minor)
> {
>         struct hlist_head *list = &bsg_device_list[bsg_list_idx(minor)];
> 
> bsg_device_list[] access should be done under bsg_mutex lock.
> 
> May not be a problem currently because of lock_kernel but worth fixing anyway.
> 
>         struct bsg_device *bd = NULL;
>         struct hlist_node *entry;
> 
>         mutex_lock(&bsg_mutex);
> 

They were fixed. Please check the latest code:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-2.6-block.git bsg

We wait for Linus to pull from it.


> static int
> bsg_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>           unsigned long arg)
> {
> ...
>         case SCSI_IOCTL_SEND_COMMAND: {
> 
> Do we really want to add support for this *deprecated* ioctl to
> the *new* and shiny bsg driver?
> 
>                 void __user *uarg = (void __user *) arg;
>                 return scsi_cmd_ioctl(file, bd->queue, NULL, cmd, uarg);
>         }

We might remove it.


> int bsg_register_queue(struct request_queue *q, const char *name)
> {
> ...
>         memset(bcd, 0, sizeof(*bcd));
> ...
>         dev = MKDEV(BSG_MAJOR, bcd->minor);
>         class_dev = class_device_create(bsg_class, NULL, dev, bcd->dev, "%s", name);
> 
> bcd->dev is always 0 (NULL).
> 
> Is it OK to pass NULL struct device *dev argument to class_device_create()?

It's ok, I guess.


> It should be fixed by either removing bcd->dev or by setting it to something
> other than zero.
> 
> ...
> 
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Jens Axboe");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Block layer SGSI generic (sg) driver");
> 
> SGSI? :)

It was fixed in the latest code.


Thanks,

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-07-17 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-16 23:57 block/bsg.c Andrew Morton
2007-07-17  0:47 ` block/bsg.c Jeff Garzik
2007-07-17  0:53   ` block/bsg.c Andrew Morton
2007-07-17  0:58     ` block/bsg.c Jeff Garzik
2007-07-17  1:09       ` block/bsg.c Andrew Morton
2007-07-17  1:12         ` block/bsg.c Jeff Garzik
2007-07-17  1:47         ` block/bsg.c Jeff Garzik
2007-07-17  1:47           ` block/bsg.c Jeff Garzik
2007-07-17  3:00           ` block/bsg.c Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-17  3:00             ` block/bsg.c Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-17  3:03           ` block/bsg.c Andrew Morton
2007-07-17  3:03             ` block/bsg.c Andrew Morton
2007-07-17  0:52 ` block/bsg.c Satyam Sharma
2007-07-17  0:57   ` block/bsg.c FUJITA Tomonori
2007-07-17  1:01   ` block/bsg.c Gabriel C
2007-07-17  4:57 ` block/bsg.c Joseph Fannin
2007-07-17  6:38 ` block/bsg.c Jens Axboe
2007-07-17  6:43   ` block/bsg.c FUJITA Tomonori
2007-07-17  6:59     ` block/bsg.c Jens Axboe
2007-07-17  7:08       ` block/bsg.c FUJITA Tomonori
2007-07-17  7:10         ` block/bsg.c Jens Axboe
2007-07-17  7:17           ` block/bsg.c FUJITA Tomonori
2007-07-17  7:19             ` block/bsg.c Jens Axboe
2007-07-17 10:07           ` block/bsg.c FUJITA Tomonori
2007-07-17 10:19             ` block/bsg.c Jens Axboe
2007-07-17 18:53               ` block/bsg.c James Bottomley
2007-07-17 19:48                 ` block/bsg.c Andrew Morton
2007-07-17 19:52                   ` block/bsg.c James Bottomley
2007-07-18  0:20                 ` block/bsg.c FUJITA Tomonori
2007-07-18 13:54                   ` block/bsg.c James Bottomley
2007-07-18 14:23                     ` block/bsg.c James Bottomley
2007-07-18 23:18                       ` block/bsg.c FUJITA Tomonori
2007-07-17 20:52               ` block/bsg.c Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-07-17 21:34                 ` block/bsg.c Andrew Morton
2007-07-17 23:19                   ` block/bsg.c Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-07-17 22:26                 ` FUJITA Tomonori [this message]
2007-07-17 22:26                   ` block/bsg.c FUJITA Tomonori
2007-07-18 20:39                   ` block/bsg.c Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-07-18 23:44                     ` block/bsg.c FUJITA Tomonori
2007-07-17  7:24   ` block/bsg.c FUJITA Tomonori
2007-07-17 19:18   ` block/bsg.c Andrew Morton
2007-07-17 20:22     ` block/bsg.c Andrew Morton
2007-07-17 22:19       ` block/bsg.c James Bottomley
2007-07-17 22:54         ` block/bsg.c Andrew Morton
2007-07-17 22:57           ` block/bsg.c James Bottomley
2007-07-17 23:37         ` block/bsg.c Jeff Garzik
2007-07-18  0:43           ` block/bsg.c Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-07-18 14:11             ` block/bsg.c James Bottomley
2007-07-18 20:32               ` block/bsg.c Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-07-18 21:32                 ` block/bsg.c James Bottomley
2007-07-17  7:48 ` block/bsg.c Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-17 12:04 ` [PATCH] Don't define empty struct bsg_class_device if !CONFIG_BLK_DEV_BSG (was: Re: block/bsg.c) Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-07-17 12:10   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070718072644F.tomof@acm.org \
    --to=tomof@acm.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.orgfujita.tomonori \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.