From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: ioe-lkml@rameria.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ak@suse.de,
mingo@elte.hu, clameter@sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Add config variables for SMP_MAX
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:45:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080128104520.e1e6c878.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <479108C3.1010800@sgi.com>
Ten days ago, Mike wrote:
> The primary problem arises because of cpumask_t local variables. Until I
> can deal with these, increasing NR_CPUS to a really large value increases
> stack size dramatically.
>
> Here are the top stack consumers with NR_CPUS = 4k.
>
> 16392 isolated_cpu_setup
> 10328 build_sched_domains
The problem in kernel/sched.c:isolated_cpu_setup() is an array of
NR_CPUS integers:
static int __init isolated_cpu_setup(char *str)
{
int ints[NR_CPUS], i;
str = get_options(str, ARRAY_SIZE(ints), ints);
Since isolated_cpu_setup() is an __init routine, perhaps we could
make that ints[] array static __initdata?
The build_sched_domains() may require more thought and code rework.
See also the lkml discussion of my patches that reworked the cpuset
code implementing 'sched_load_balance' calling into build_sched_domains
() via kernel/sched.c:partition_sched_domains(). This is not performance
critical code, fortunately.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: ioe-lkml@rameria.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ak@suse.de,
mingo@elte.hu, clameter@sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Add config variables for SMP_MAX
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:45:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080128104520.e1e6c878.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <479108C3.1010800@sgi.com>
Ten days ago, Mike wrote:
> The primary problem arises because of cpumask_t local variables. Until I
> can deal with these, increasing NR_CPUS to a really large value increases
> stack size dramatically.
>
> Here are the top stack consumers with NR_CPUS = 4k.
>
> 16392 isolated_cpu_setup
> 10328 build_sched_domains
The problem in kernel/sched.c:isolated_cpu_setup() is an array of
NR_CPUS integers:
static int __init isolated_cpu_setup(char *str)
{
int ints[NR_CPUS], i;
str = get_options(str, ARRAY_SIZE(ints), ints);
Since isolated_cpu_setup() is an __init routine, perhaps we could
make that ints[] array static __initdata?
The build_sched_domains() may require more thought and code rework.
See also the lkml discussion of my patches that reworked the cpuset
code implementing 'sched_load_balance' calling into build_sched_domains
() via kernel/sched.c:partition_sched_domains(). This is not performance
critical code, fortunately.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-28 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-18 18:30 [PATCH 0/5] x86: Reduce memory usage for large count NR_CPUs fixup travis
2008-01-18 18:30 ` travis
2008-01-18 18:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: Change size of node ids from u8 to u16 fixup travis
2008-01-18 18:30 ` travis
2008-01-18 19:56 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-01-18 19:56 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-01-18 19:59 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-18 19:59 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-19 4:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-01-19 4:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-01-19 4:36 ` David Rientjes
2008-01-19 4:36 ` David Rientjes
2008-01-19 4:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-01-19 4:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-01-19 5:17 ` David Rientjes
2008-01-19 5:17 ` David Rientjes
2008-01-19 6:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-01-19 6:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-01-19 21:25 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-19 21:25 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-19 22:33 ` David Rientjes
2008-01-19 22:33 ` David Rientjes
2008-01-20 0:41 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-20 0:41 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-20 1:31 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-01-20 1:31 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-01-20 6:22 ` David Rientjes
2008-01-20 6:22 ` David Rientjes
2008-01-18 18:30 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: Change NR_CPUS arrays in numa_64 fixup travis
2008-01-18 18:30 ` travis
2008-01-18 18:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: Change bios_cpu_apicid to percpu data variable fixup travis
2008-01-18 18:30 ` travis
2008-01-18 18:30 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: Add config variables for SMP_MAX travis
2008-01-18 18:30 ` travis
2008-01-18 20:04 ` Ingo Oeser
2008-01-18 20:04 ` Ingo Oeser
2008-01-18 20:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 20:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 20:14 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-18 20:14 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-18 20:36 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-18 20:36 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-18 20:48 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-18 20:48 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-18 21:02 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: Add config variables for SMP_MAX II Andi Kleen
2008-01-18 21:02 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: Add config variables for SMP_MAX Ingo Molnar
2008-01-18 20:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-18 20:55 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-18 20:55 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-18 20:58 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-18 20:58 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-28 16:45 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2008-01-28 16:45 ` Paul Jackson
2008-01-28 17:00 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-28 17:00 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-18 20:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-18 20:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-19 14:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-19 15:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-19 15:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-19 15:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-19 15:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-19 21:52 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-19 21:52 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-19 23:24 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-19 23:24 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-20 1:14 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-20 1:14 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-19 21:39 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-19 21:39 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-18 18:30 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86: Add debug of invalid per_cpu map accesses travis
2008-01-18 18:30 ` travis
2008-01-18 18:33 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-18 18:33 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-18 18:49 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-18 18:49 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-18 18:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 18:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 20:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-18 20:49 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080128104520.e1e6c878.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=ioe-lkml@rameria.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.