From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Add config variables for SMP_MAX
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:14:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4792A073.60602@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080119152357.GA11706@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
>> and then it crashes with:
>>
>> [ 0.000000] Bootmem setup node 0 0000000000000000-000000003fff0000
>> [ 0.000000] KERN_NOTICE cpu_to_node(0): usage too early!
>> PANIC: early exception 06 rip 10:ffffffff81f77f30 error 0 cr2 f06f53
>> [ 0.000000] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24-rc8 #422
>> [ 0.000000]
>> [ 0.000000] Call Trace:
>> [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff81f76b4a>] ? setup_node_bootmem+0x1a0/0x1b8
>> [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff81f77f30>] ? acpi_scan_nodes+0x204/0x255
>> [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff81f77f30>] ? acpi_scan_nodes+0x204/0x255
>> [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff81f77103>] ? numa_initmem_init+0x343/0x471
>>
I *think* but have not been able to verify that this will fix the above panic:
--- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ int __init acpi_scan_nodes(unsigned long
setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
- int node = cpu_to_node(i);
+ int node = early_cpu_to_node(i);
if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
continue;
if (!node_isset(node, node_possible_map))
The problem is that the x86 test tree kernel doesn't boot, even without my
changes. And the stack trace I don't think is correct.
Thanks,
Mike
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Add config variables for SMP_MAX
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:14:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4792A073.60602@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080119152357.GA11706@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
>> and then it crashes with:
>>
>> [ 0.000000] Bootmem setup node 0 0000000000000000-000000003fff0000
>> [ 0.000000] KERN_NOTICE cpu_to_node(0): usage too early!
>> PANIC: early exception 06 rip 10:ffffffff81f77f30 error 0 cr2 f06f53
>> [ 0.000000] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24-rc8 #422
>> [ 0.000000]
>> [ 0.000000] Call Trace:
>> [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff81f76b4a>] ? setup_node_bootmem+0x1a0/0x1b8
>> [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff81f77f30>] ? acpi_scan_nodes+0x204/0x255
>> [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff81f77f30>] ? acpi_scan_nodes+0x204/0x255
>> [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff81f77103>] ? numa_initmem_init+0x343/0x471
>>
I *think* but have not been able to verify that this will fix the above panic:
--- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ int __init acpi_scan_nodes(unsigned long
setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
- int node = cpu_to_node(i);
+ int node = early_cpu_to_node(i);
if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
continue;
if (!node_isset(node, node_possible_map))
The problem is that the x86 test tree kernel doesn't boot, even without my
changes. And the stack trace I don't think is correct.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-20 1:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-18 18:30 [PATCH 0/5] x86: Reduce memory usage for large count NR_CPUs fixup travis
2008-01-18 18:30 ` travis
2008-01-18 18:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: Change size of node ids from u8 to u16 fixup travis
2008-01-18 18:30 ` travis
2008-01-18 19:56 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-01-18 19:56 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-01-18 19:59 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-18 19:59 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-19 4:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-01-19 4:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-01-19 4:36 ` David Rientjes
2008-01-19 4:36 ` David Rientjes
2008-01-19 4:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-01-19 4:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-01-19 5:17 ` David Rientjes
2008-01-19 5:17 ` David Rientjes
2008-01-19 6:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-01-19 6:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-01-19 21:25 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-19 21:25 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-19 22:33 ` David Rientjes
2008-01-19 22:33 ` David Rientjes
2008-01-20 0:41 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-20 0:41 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-20 1:31 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-01-20 1:31 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-01-20 6:22 ` David Rientjes
2008-01-20 6:22 ` David Rientjes
2008-01-18 18:30 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: Change NR_CPUS arrays in numa_64 fixup travis
2008-01-18 18:30 ` travis
2008-01-18 18:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: Change bios_cpu_apicid to percpu data variable fixup travis
2008-01-18 18:30 ` travis
2008-01-18 18:30 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: Add config variables for SMP_MAX travis
2008-01-18 18:30 ` travis
2008-01-18 20:04 ` Ingo Oeser
2008-01-18 20:04 ` Ingo Oeser
2008-01-18 20:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 20:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 20:14 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-18 20:14 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-18 20:36 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-18 20:36 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-18 20:48 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-18 20:48 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-18 21:02 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: Add config variables for SMP_MAX II Andi Kleen
2008-01-18 21:02 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: Add config variables for SMP_MAX Ingo Molnar
2008-01-18 20:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-18 20:55 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-18 20:55 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-18 20:58 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-18 20:58 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-28 16:45 ` Paul Jackson
2008-01-28 16:45 ` Paul Jackson
2008-01-28 17:00 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-28 17:00 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-18 20:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-18 20:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-19 14:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-19 15:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-19 15:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-19 15:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-19 15:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-19 21:52 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-19 21:52 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-19 23:24 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-19 23:24 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-20 1:14 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2008-01-20 1:14 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-19 21:39 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-19 21:39 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-18 18:30 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86: Add debug of invalid per_cpu map accesses travis
2008-01-18 18:30 ` travis
2008-01-18 18:33 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-18 18:33 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-18 18:49 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-18 18:49 ` Mike Travis
2008-01-18 18:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 18:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 20:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-18 20:49 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4792A073.60602@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.