From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@qumranet.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>, Izik Eidus <izike@qumranet.com>,
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
general@lists.openfabrics.org,
Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
Kanoj Sarcar <kanojsarcar@yahoo.com>,
steiner@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, daniel.blueman@quadrics.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate address ranges
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:48:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080229214800.GD8091@v2.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802291329250.13402@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 01:34:34PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 01:03:16PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > That means we need both the anon_vma locks and the i_mmap_lock to become
> > > semaphores. I think semaphores are better than mutexes. Rik and Lee saw
> > > some performance improvements because list can be traversed in parallel
> > > when the anon_vma lock is switched to be a rw lock.
> >
> > The improvement was with a rw spinlock IIRC, so I don't see how it's
> > related to this.
>
> AFAICT The rw semaphore fastpath is similar in performance to a rw
> spinlock.
read side is taken in the slow path.
write side is taken in the fast path.
pagefault is fast path, VM during swapping is slow path.
> > Perhaps the rwlock spinlock can be changed to a rw semaphore without
> > measurable overscheduling in the fast path. However theoretically
>
> Overscheduling? You mean overhead?
The only possible overhead that a rw semaphore could ever generate vs
a rw lock is overscheduling.
> > speaking the rw_lock spinlock is more efficient than a rw semaphore in
> > case of a little contention during the page fault fast path because
> > the critical section is just a list_add so it'd be overkill to
> > schedule while waiting. That's why currently it's a spinlock (or rw
> > spinlock).
>
> On the other hand a semaphore puts the process to sleep and may actually
> improve performance because there is less time spend in a busy loop.
> Other processes may do something useful and we stay off the contended
> cacheline reducing traffic on the interconnect.
Yes, that's the positive side, the negative side is that you'll put
the task in uninterruptible sleep and call schedule() and require a
wakeup, because a list_add taking <1usec is running in the
other cpu. No other downside. But that's the only reason it's a
spinlock right now, infact there can't be any other reason.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@qumranet.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
steiner@sgi.com, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Izik Eidus <izike@qumranet.com>,
Kanoj Sarcar <kanojsarcar@yahoo.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>,
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, daniel.blueman@quadrics.com,
Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
general@lists.openfabrics.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [ofa-general] Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate address ranges
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:48:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080229214800.GD8091@v2.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802291329250.13402@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 01:34:34PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 01:03:16PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > That means we need both the anon_vma locks and the i_mmap_lock to become
> > > semaphores. I think semaphores are better than mutexes. Rik and Lee saw
> > > some performance improvements because list can be traversed in parallel
> > > when the anon_vma lock is switched to be a rw lock.
> >
> > The improvement was with a rw spinlock IIRC, so I don't see how it's
> > related to this.
>
> AFAICT The rw semaphore fastpath is similar in performance to a rw
> spinlock.
read side is taken in the slow path.
write side is taken in the fast path.
pagefault is fast path, VM during swapping is slow path.
> > Perhaps the rwlock spinlock can be changed to a rw semaphore without
> > measurable overscheduling in the fast path. However theoretically
>
> Overscheduling? You mean overhead?
The only possible overhead that a rw semaphore could ever generate vs
a rw lock is overscheduling.
> > speaking the rw_lock spinlock is more efficient than a rw semaphore in
> > case of a little contention during the page fault fast path because
> > the critical section is just a list_add so it'd be overkill to
> > schedule while waiting. That's why currently it's a spinlock (or rw
> > spinlock).
>
> On the other hand a semaphore puts the process to sleep and may actually
> improve performance because there is less time spend in a busy loop.
> Other processes may do something useful and we stay off the contended
> cacheline reducing traffic on the interconnect.
Yes, that's the positive side, the negative side is that you'll put
the task in uninterruptible sleep and call schedule() and require a
wakeup, because a list_add taking <1usec is running in the
other cpu. No other downside. But that's the only reason it's a
spinlock right now, infact there can't be any other reason.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@qumranet.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>, Izik Eidus <izike@qumranet.com>,
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
general@lists.openfabrics.org,
Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
Kanoj Sarcar <kanojsarcar@yahoo.com>,
steiner@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, daniel.blueman@quadrics.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate address ranges
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:48:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080229214800.GD8091@v2.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802291329250.13402@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 01:34:34PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 01:03:16PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > That means we need both the anon_vma locks and the i_mmap_lock to become
> > > semaphores. I think semaphores are better than mutexes. Rik and Lee saw
> > > some performance improvements because list can be traversed in parallel
> > > when the anon_vma lock is switched to be a rw lock.
> >
> > The improvement was with a rw spinlock IIRC, so I don't see how it's
> > related to this.
>
> AFAICT The rw semaphore fastpath is similar in performance to a rw
> spinlock.
read side is taken in the slow path.
write side is taken in the fast path.
pagefault is fast path, VM during swapping is slow path.
> > Perhaps the rwlock spinlock can be changed to a rw semaphore without
> > measurable overscheduling in the fast path. However theoretically
>
> Overscheduling? You mean overhead?
The only possible overhead that a rw semaphore could ever generate vs
a rw lock is overscheduling.
> > speaking the rw_lock spinlock is more efficient than a rw semaphore in
> > case of a little contention during the page fault fast path because
> > the critical section is just a list_add so it'd be overkill to
> > schedule while waiting. That's why currently it's a spinlock (or rw
> > spinlock).
>
> On the other hand a semaphore puts the process to sleep and may actually
> improve performance because there is less time spend in a busy loop.
> Other processes may do something useful and we stay off the contended
> cacheline reducing traffic on the interconnect.
Yes, that's the positive side, the negative side is that you'll put
the task in uninterruptible sleep and call schedule() and require a
wakeup, because a list_add taking <1usec is running in the
other cpu. No other downside. But that's the only reason it's a
spinlock right now, infact there can't be any other reason.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-29 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 376+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-15 6:48 [patch 0/6] MMU Notifiers V7 Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 6:48 ` [ofa-general] " Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 6:49 ` [patch 1/6] mmu_notifier: Core code Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 6:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-16 3:37 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 3:37 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 3:37 ` [ofa-general] " Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 8:45 ` Avi Kivity
2008-02-16 8:45 ` Avi Kivity
2008-02-16 8:45 ` Avi Kivity
2008-02-16 8:56 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 8:56 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 8:56 ` [ofa-general] " Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 9:21 ` Avi Kivity
2008-02-16 9:21 ` Avi Kivity
2008-02-16 9:21 ` Avi Kivity
2008-02-16 10:41 ` Brice Goglin
2008-02-16 10:41 ` Brice Goglin
2008-02-16 10:58 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 10:58 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 19:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-16 19:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-16 19:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-16 19:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-16 19:21 ` [ofa-general] " Christoph Lameter
2008-02-17 3:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-17 3:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-17 3:01 ` [ofa-general] " Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-17 12:24 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-17 12:24 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-17 12:24 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-17 5:04 ` Doug Maxey
2008-02-17 5:04 ` Doug Maxey
2008-02-17 5:04 ` Doug Maxey
2008-02-18 22:33 ` Roland Dreier
2008-02-18 22:33 ` Roland Dreier
2008-02-18 22:33 ` [ofa-general] " Roland Dreier
2008-02-15 6:49 ` [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate address ranges Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 6:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-16 3:37 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 3:37 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 3:37 ` [ofa-general] " Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 19:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-16 19:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-16 19:26 ` [ofa-general] " Christoph Lameter
2008-02-19 8:54 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-19 8:54 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-19 8:54 ` [ofa-general] " Nick Piggin
2008-02-19 13:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-19 13:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-19 13:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-27 22:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-27 22:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-27 22:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-27 23:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-27 23:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-27 23:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-19 23:08 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-19 23:08 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-19 23:08 ` [ofa-general] " Nick Piggin
2008-02-20 1:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-20 1:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-20 1:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-20 3:00 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-20 3:00 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-20 3:00 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-20 3:11 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-20 3:11 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-20 3:11 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-20 3:19 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-20 3:19 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-20 3:19 ` [ofa-general] " Robin Holt
2008-02-27 22:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-27 22:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-27 22:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 0:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-28 0:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-28 0:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-27 22:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-27 22:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-27 22:35 ` [ofa-general] " Christoph Lameter
2008-02-27 22:42 ` Jack Steiner
2008-02-27 22:42 ` Jack Steiner
2008-02-27 22:42 ` [ofa-general] " Jack Steiner
2008-02-28 0:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 0:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 0:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 0:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-28 0:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-28 0:11 ` [ofa-general] " Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-28 0:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 0:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 0:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 0:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-28 0:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-28 0:52 ` [ofa-general] " Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-28 1:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 1:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 1:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 1:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-28 1:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-28 1:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-28 18:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 18:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 18:43 ` [ofa-general] " Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 0:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-29 0:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-29 0:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-29 0:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 0:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 0:59 ` [ofa-general] " Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 13:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-29 13:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-29 13:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-29 19:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 19:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 19:55 ` [ofa-general] " Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 20:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-29 20:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-29 20:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-29 21:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 21:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 21:03 ` [ofa-general] " Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 21:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-29 21:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-29 21:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-29 21:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 21:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 21:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 21:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 21:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 21:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 21:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2008-02-29 21:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-29 21:48 ` [ofa-general] " Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-29 22:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 22:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 22:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-29 22:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-29 22:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-29 22:41 ` [ofa-general] " Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-28 10:53 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-28 10:53 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-28 10:53 ` [ofa-general] " Robin Holt
2008-03-03 5:11 ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-03 5:11 ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-03 5:11 ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-03 19:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-03 19:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-03 19:28 ` [ofa-general] " Christoph Lameter
2008-03-03 19:50 ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-03 19:50 ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-04 18:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-04 18:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-04 18:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-05 0:52 ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-05 0:52 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-15 6:49 ` [patch 3/6] mmu_notifier: invalidate_page callbacks Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 6:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-16 3:37 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 3:37 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 3:37 ` [ofa-general] " Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 11:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-16 11:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-16 11:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-16 19:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-16 19:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-16 19:22 ` [ofa-general] " Christoph Lameter
2008-02-16 19:54 ` Avi Kivity
2008-02-16 19:54 ` Avi Kivity
2008-02-16 19:54 ` [ofa-general] " Avi Kivity
2008-02-19 8:46 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-19 8:46 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-19 8:46 ` [ofa-general] " Nick Piggin
2008-02-19 13:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-19 13:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-19 13:30 ` [ofa-general] " Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-18 1:51 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-18 1:51 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-18 1:51 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-15 6:49 ` [patch 4/6] mmu_notifier: Skeleton driver for a simple mmu_notifier Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 6:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 6:49 ` [patch 5/6] mmu_notifier: Support for drivers with revers maps (f.e. for XPmem) Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 6:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-16 3:37 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 3:37 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 3:37 ` [ofa-general] " Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 19:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-16 19:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-16 19:28 ` [ofa-general] " Christoph Lameter
2008-02-19 23:55 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-19 23:55 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-19 23:55 ` [ofa-general] " Nick Piggin
2008-02-20 3:12 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-20 3:12 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-20 3:12 ` [ofa-general] " Robin Holt
2008-02-20 3:51 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-20 3:51 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-20 3:51 ` [ofa-general] " Nick Piggin
2008-02-20 9:00 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-20 9:00 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-20 9:00 ` [ofa-general] " Robin Holt
2008-02-20 9:05 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-20 9:05 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-20 9:05 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-21 4:20 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-21 4:20 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-21 10:58 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-21 10:58 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-21 10:58 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-26 6:11 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-26 6:11 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-26 6:11 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-26 7:21 ` [ofa-general] " Gleb Natapov
2008-02-26 7:21 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-02-26 7:21 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-02-26 8:52 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-26 8:52 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-26 8:52 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-26 9:38 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-02-26 9:38 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-02-26 9:38 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-02-26 9:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-26 9:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-26 9:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-26 12:28 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-26 12:28 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-26 12:28 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-26 12:29 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-26 12:29 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-26 12:29 ` [ofa-general] " Robin Holt
2008-02-27 22:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-27 22:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-27 22:43 ` [ofa-general] " Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 0:42 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-28 0:42 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-28 0:42 ` [ofa-general] " Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-28 1:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 1:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 1:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 6:49 ` [patch 6/6] mmu_rmap_notifier: Skeleton for complex driver that uses its own rmaps Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 6:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-16 10:48 ` [PATCH] KVM swapping with MMU Notifiers V7 Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-16 10:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-16 10:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-16 11:08 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 11:08 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 11:08 ` [ofa-general] " Andrew Morton
2008-02-18 12:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-18 12:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-16 11:51 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-16 11:51 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-16 11:51 ` [ofa-general] " Robin Holt
2008-02-18 12:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-18 12:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-18 12:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-08 22:06 [patch 0/6] MMU Notifiers V6 Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 22:06 ` [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate address ranges Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 22:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 2:29 [patch 0/6] [RFC] MMU Notifiers V3 Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 2:29 ` [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate address ranges Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 2:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-28 20:28 [patch 0/6] [RFC] MMU Notifiers V2 Christoph Lameter
2008-01-28 20:28 ` [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate address ranges Christoph Lameter
2008-01-28 20:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-29 16:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-29 16:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-29 16:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-29 18:28 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-29 18:28 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-29 18:28 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-29 20:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-29 20:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-29 20:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-29 21:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-29 21:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-29 21:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-29 21:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-29 21:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-29 21:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-29 22:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-29 22:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-29 22:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-29 22:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-29 22:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-29 22:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-29 23:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-29 23:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-29 23:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 0:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 0:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 0:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-29 19:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-29 19:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-29 19:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-29 21:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-29 21:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-29 21:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-29 21:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-29 21:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-29 22:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-29 22:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-29 22:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-29 22:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-29 22:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-29 22:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 0:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 0:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 0:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 0:05 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 0:05 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 0:05 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 0:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 0:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 0:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 0:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 0:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 0:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 8:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-30 8:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-30 0:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 0:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 0:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 0:28 ` Jack Steiner
2008-01-30 0:28 ` Jack Steiner
2008-01-30 0:28 ` Jack Steiner
2008-01-30 0:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 0:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 0:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 13:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 13:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 13:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 14:43 ` Jack Steiner
2008-01-30 14:43 ` Jack Steiner
2008-01-30 14:43 ` Jack Steiner
2008-01-30 19:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 19:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 19:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 20:29 ` Jack Steiner
2008-01-30 20:29 ` Jack Steiner
2008-01-30 20:29 ` Jack Steiner
2008-01-30 20:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 20:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 20:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 16:11 ` Robin Holt
2008-01-30 16:11 ` Robin Holt
2008-01-30 16:11 ` Robin Holt
2008-01-30 17:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 17:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 17:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 17:30 ` Robin Holt
2008-01-30 17:30 ` Robin Holt
2008-01-30 17:30 ` Robin Holt
2008-01-30 18:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 18:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 18:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 19:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 19:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 19:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 22:18 ` Robin Holt
2008-01-30 22:18 ` Robin Holt
2008-01-30 22:18 ` Robin Holt
2008-01-30 23:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 23:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-31 0:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-31 0:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-31 0:01 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801301555550.1722-RYO/mD75kfhx2SFC9UQUAuF7EQX82lMiAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2008-01-31 0:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
[not found] ` <20080131003434.GE7185-lysg2Xt5kKMAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2008-01-31 1:46 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801301728110.2454-RYO/mD75kfhx2SFC9UQUAuF7EQX82lMiAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2008-01-31 2:34 ` Robin Holt
[not found] ` <20080131023401.GY26420-sJ/iWh9BUns@public.gmane.org>
2008-01-31 2:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-31 10:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-31 2:08 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801301805200.14071-RYO/mD75kfhx2SFC9UQUAuF7EQX82lMiAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2008-01-31 2:42 ` Andrea Arcangeli
[not found] ` <20080131024252.GF7185-lysg2Xt5kKMAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2008-01-31 2:51 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801301848550.14263-RYO/mD75kfhx2SFC9UQUAuF7EQX82lMiAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2008-01-31 13:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-01-30 19:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 19:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-30 19:35 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080229214800.GD8091@v2.random \
--to=andrea@qumranet.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=daniel.blueman@quadrics.com \
--cc=general@lists.openfabrics.org \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=izike@qumranet.com \
--cc=kanojsarcar@yahoo.com \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=swise@opengridcomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.