From: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:31:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080325163103.GA2651@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080325143059.GB11323@elte.hu>
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 03:30:59PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> > Index: linux/arch/x86/kernel/genapic_64.c
>
> > @@ -69,7 +73,16 @@ void send_IPI_self(int vector)
> >
> > unsigned int get_apic_id(void)
> > {
> > - return (apic_read(APIC_ID) >> 24) & 0xFFu;
> > + unsigned int id;
> > +
> > + preempt_disable();
> > + id = apic_read(APIC_ID);
> > + if (uv_system_type >= UV_X2APIC)
> > + id |= __get_cpu_var(x2apic_extra_bits);
> > + else
> > + id = (id >> 24) & 0xFFu;;
> > + preempt_enable();
> > + return id;
>
> dont we want to put get_apic_id() into struct genapic instead? We
> already have ID management there.
>
> also, we want to unify 32-bit and 64-bit genapic code and just have
> genapic all across x86.
Long term, I think that makes sense. However, I think that should be a
separate series of patches since there are significant differences between
the 32-bit and 64-bit genapic structs.
--- jack
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:31:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080325163103.GA2651@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080325143059.GB11323@elte.hu>
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 03:30:59PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> > Index: linux/arch/x86/kernel/genapic_64.c
>
> > @@ -69,7 +73,16 @@ void send_IPI_self(int vector)
> >
> > unsigned int get_apic_id(void)
> > {
> > - return (apic_read(APIC_ID) >> 24) & 0xFFu;
> > + unsigned int id;
> > +
> > + preempt_disable();
> > + id = apic_read(APIC_ID);
> > + if (uv_system_type >= UV_X2APIC)
> > + id |= __get_cpu_var(x2apic_extra_bits);
> > + else
> > + id = (id >> 24) & 0xFFu;;
> > + preempt_enable();
> > + return id;
>
> dont we want to put get_apic_id() into struct genapic instead? We
> already have ID management there.
>
> also, we want to unify 32-bit and 64-bit genapic code and just have
> genapic all across x86.
Long term, I think that makes sense. However, I think that should be a
separate series of patches since there are significant differences between
the 32-bit and 64-bit genapic structs.
--- jack
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-25 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-24 18:21 [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic Jack Steiner
2008-03-24 18:21 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-25 10:25 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-25 10:25 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-25 17:56 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-25 17:56 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-25 18:06 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-25 18:06 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-26 2:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-03-26 2:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-03-26 3:22 ` Glauber Costa
2008-03-26 3:22 ` Glauber Costa
2008-03-26 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26 7:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26 7:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-30 20:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-30 20:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-30 21:03 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-30 21:03 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-30 21:18 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-30 21:18 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-30 23:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-30 23:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-31 2:18 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-31 2:18 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-31 2:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-31 2:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-31 12:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-31 12:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-31 12:52 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-31 12:52 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-31 18:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-31 18:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-31 6:48 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-31 6:48 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-25 14:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-25 14:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-25 16:31 ` Jack Steiner [this message]
2008-03-25 16:31 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-26 3:24 ` Glauber Costa
2008-03-26 3:24 ` Glauber Costa
2008-03-30 20:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-30 20:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-30 21:08 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-30 21:08 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-30 23:24 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-30 23:24 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080325163103.GA2651@sgi.com \
--to=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.