All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
Date: 25 Mar 2008 11:25:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87abknhzhd.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080324182122.GA28327@sgi.com>

Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com> writes:

>  unsigned int get_apic_id(void)
>  {
> -	return (apic_read(APIC_ID) >> 24) & 0xFFu;
> +	unsigned int id;
> +
> +	preempt_disable();
> +	id = apic_read(APIC_ID);
> +	if (uv_system_type >= UV_X2APIC)
> +		id  |= __get_cpu_var(x2apic_extra_bits);
> +	else
> +		id = (id >> 24) & 0xFFu;;
> +	preempt_enable();
> +	return id;

Really caller should have done preempt_disable(), otherwise
the value can be wrong as soon as you return.

Better probably to just WARN_ON if preemption is on

(just be careful it does not trigger in oopses and machine checks)

> +
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct uv_hub_info_s, __uv_hub_info);
> +EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(__uv_hub_info);

GPL export too?

> +
> +struct uv_blade_info *uv_blade_info;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_blade_info);
> +
> +short *uv_node_to_blade;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_node_to_blade);
> +
> +short *uv_cpu_to_blade;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_cpu_to_blade);
> +
> +short uv_possible_blades;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_possible_blades);
> +
> +/* Start with all IRQs pointing to boot CPU.  IRQ balancing will shift them. */
> +/* Probably incorrect for UV  ZZZ */

Actually it should be correct. Except for UV you likely really need a
NUMA aware irqbalanced. I used to have some old very hackish patches
to implement that in irqbalanced, but never pushed it because the
systems I was working on didn't really need it.


> +
> +static void uv_send_IPI_one(int cpu, int vector)
> +{
> +	unsigned long val, apicid;
> +	int nasid;
> +
> +	apicid = per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_apicid, cpu); /* ZZZ - cache node-local ? */

Instead of doing that it might be better to implement __read_mostly per CPU variables
(should not be very hard) 

> +static void uv_send_IPI_mask(cpumask_t mask, int vector)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	unsigned int cpu;
> +
> +	local_irq_save(flags);
> +	for (cpu = 0; cpu < NR_CPUS; ++cpu)
> +		if (cpu_isset(cpu, mask))
> +			uv_send_IPI_one(cpu, vector);
> +	local_irq_restore(flags);

This could disable interrupts for a long time could't it?  Really needed?


> +	bytes = sizeof(struct uv_blade_info) * uv_num_possible_blades();
> +	uv_blade_info = alloc_bootmem_pages(bytes);
> +	memset(uv_blade_info, 255, bytes);

255?  Strange poison value.

> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile	2008-03-21 15:36:35.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile	2008-03-21 15:49:38.000000000 -0500
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ scx200-y			+= scx200_32.o
>  ###
>  # 64 bit specific files
>  ifeq ($(CONFIG_X86_64),y)
> -        obj-y				+= genapic_64.o genapic_flat_64.o
> +        obj-y				+= genapic_64.o genapic_flat_64.o genx2apic_uv_x.o

Definitely should be a CONFIG

> @@ -418,6 +419,9 @@ static int __cpuinit wakeup_secondary_vi
>  	unsigned long send_status, accept_status = 0;
>  	int maxlvt, num_starts, j;
>  
> +	if (get_uv_system_type() == UV_NON_UNIQUE_APIC)
> +		return uv_wakeup_secondary(phys_apicid, start_rip);
> +

This should be probably factored properly (didn't Jeremy have smp_ops 
for this some time ago) so that even the default case is a call.

>  	Dprintk("Asserting INIT.\n");
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -679,7 +683,8 @@ do_rest:
>  				/* trampoline code not run */
>  				printk("Not responding.\n");
>  #ifdef APIC_DEBUG
> -			inquire_remote_apic(apicid);
> +			if (get_uv_system_type() != UV_NON_UNIQUE_APIC)
> +				inquire_remote_apic(apicid);

Dito.


-Andi

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
Date: 25 Mar 2008 11:25:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87abknhzhd.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080324182122.GA28327@sgi.com>

Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com> writes:

>  unsigned int get_apic_id(void)
>  {
> -	return (apic_read(APIC_ID) >> 24) & 0xFFu;
> +	unsigned int id;
> +
> +	preempt_disable();
> +	id = apic_read(APIC_ID);
> +	if (uv_system_type >= UV_X2APIC)
> +		id  |= __get_cpu_var(x2apic_extra_bits);
> +	else
> +		id = (id >> 24) & 0xFFu;;
> +	preempt_enable();
> +	return id;

Really caller should have done preempt_disable(), otherwise
the value can be wrong as soon as you return.

Better probably to just WARN_ON if preemption is on

(just be careful it does not trigger in oopses and machine checks)

> +
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct uv_hub_info_s, __uv_hub_info);
> +EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(__uv_hub_info);

GPL export too?

> +
> +struct uv_blade_info *uv_blade_info;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_blade_info);
> +
> +short *uv_node_to_blade;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_node_to_blade);
> +
> +short *uv_cpu_to_blade;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_cpu_to_blade);
> +
> +short uv_possible_blades;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_possible_blades);
> +
> +/* Start with all IRQs pointing to boot CPU.  IRQ balancing will shift them. */
> +/* Probably incorrect for UV  ZZZ */

Actually it should be correct. Except for UV you likely really need a
NUMA aware irqbalanced. I used to have some old very hackish patches
to implement that in irqbalanced, but never pushed it because the
systems I was working on didn't really need it.


> +
> +static void uv_send_IPI_one(int cpu, int vector)
> +{
> +	unsigned long val, apicid;
> +	int nasid;
> +
> +	apicid = per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_apicid, cpu); /* ZZZ - cache node-local ? */

Instead of doing that it might be better to implement __read_mostly per CPU variables
(should not be very hard) 

> +static void uv_send_IPI_mask(cpumask_t mask, int vector)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	unsigned int cpu;
> +
> +	local_irq_save(flags);
> +	for (cpu = 0; cpu < NR_CPUS; ++cpu)
> +		if (cpu_isset(cpu, mask))
> +			uv_send_IPI_one(cpu, vector);
> +	local_irq_restore(flags);

This could disable interrupts for a long time could't it?  Really needed?


> +	bytes = sizeof(struct uv_blade_info) * uv_num_possible_blades();
> +	uv_blade_info = alloc_bootmem_pages(bytes);
> +	memset(uv_blade_info, 255, bytes);

255?  Strange poison value.

> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile	2008-03-21 15:36:35.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile	2008-03-21 15:49:38.000000000 -0500
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ scx200-y			+= scx200_32.o
>  ###
>  # 64 bit specific files
>  ifeq ($(CONFIG_X86_64),y)
> -        obj-y				+= genapic_64.o genapic_flat_64.o
> +        obj-y				+= genapic_64.o genapic_flat_64.o genx2apic_uv_x.o

Definitely should be a CONFIG

> @@ -418,6 +419,9 @@ static int __cpuinit wakeup_secondary_vi
>  	unsigned long send_status, accept_status = 0;
>  	int maxlvt, num_starts, j;
>  
> +	if (get_uv_system_type() == UV_NON_UNIQUE_APIC)
> +		return uv_wakeup_secondary(phys_apicid, start_rip);
> +

This should be probably factored properly (didn't Jeremy have smp_ops 
for this some time ago) so that even the default case is a call.

>  	Dprintk("Asserting INIT.\n");
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -679,7 +683,8 @@ do_rest:
>  				/* trampoline code not run */
>  				printk("Not responding.\n");
>  #ifdef APIC_DEBUG
> -			inquire_remote_apic(apicid);
> +			if (get_uv_system_type() != UV_NON_UNIQUE_APIC)
> +				inquire_remote_apic(apicid);

Dito.


-Andi

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-25 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-24 18:21 [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic Jack Steiner
2008-03-24 18:21 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-25 10:25 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-03-25 10:25   ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-25 17:56   ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-25 17:56     ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-25 18:06     ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-25 18:06       ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-26  2:23       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-03-26  2:23         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-03-26  3:22         ` Glauber Costa
2008-03-26  3:22           ` Glauber Costa
2008-03-26  7:29         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26  7:29           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26  7:38     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26  7:38       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-30 20:23       ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-30 20:23         ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-30 21:03         ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-30 21:03           ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-30 21:18           ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-30 21:18             ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-30 23:29             ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-30 23:29               ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-31  2:18               ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-31  2:18                 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-31  2:20                 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-31  2:20                   ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-31 12:33                   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-31 12:33                     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-31 12:52                     ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-31 12:52                       ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-31 18:42                     ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-31 18:42                       ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-31  6:48               ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-31  6:48                 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-25 14:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-25 14:30   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-25 16:31   ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-25 16:31     ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-26  3:24     ` Glauber Costa
2008-03-26  3:24       ` Glauber Costa
2008-03-30 20:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-30 20:41   ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-30 21:08   ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-30 21:08     ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-30 23:24     ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-30 23:24       ` Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87abknhzhd.fsf@basil.nowhere.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.