From: "Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@yandex.ru>
Cc: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com,
jwboyer@gmail.com
Subject: Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system)
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:31:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080401093136.GD7465@logfs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47F1FBCF.2090902@yandex.ru>
On Tue, 1 April 2008 12:09:35 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Jörn Engel wrote:
> >About a year ago I would have used roughly the same argument. But in
> >the meanwhile I have accepted the fact that any piece of flash I'll use
> >in a notebook in the next five years will likely use SATA or USB as a
> >transport medium.
>
> Well, Thomasz was talking not about the transport I believe.
When the day comes and I can actually use raw flash with a SATA or USB
transport medium, I will be more careful and not imply that they all
expose a block device interface. Today they do.
[ With the exception of Alauda, which has a userbase of about 1 - me. ]
Jörn
--
It does not matter how slowly you go, so long as you do not stop.
-- Confucius
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-01 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-01 8:02 UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system) Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-04-01 8:45 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-01 9:03 ` Jörn Engel
2008-04-01 9:09 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-01 9:31 ` Jörn Engel [this message]
2008-04-01 9:39 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-04-01 9:57 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-02 14:17 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-04-02 14:22 ` Jörn Engel
2008-04-01 11:06 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-01 11:23 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-01 16:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-01 21:26 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-04-02 4:47 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-02 6:25 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-04-02 7:17 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-09 21:09 ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-09 21:32 ` Jörn Engel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-27 14:55 [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system Artem Bityutskiy
2008-03-31 12:29 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-03-31 12:47 ` Adrian Hunter
2008-03-31 13:20 ` Jörn Engel
2008-04-01 5:26 ` UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system) Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-01 5:28 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-01 5:56 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-01 9:25 ` Jörn Engel
2008-04-01 9:39 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-01 10:51 ` Jörn Engel
2008-04-01 11:17 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-01 9:19 ` Jörn Engel
2008-04-01 9:46 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-01 11:16 ` Jörn Engel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080401093136.GD7465@logfs.org \
--to=joern@logfs.org \
--cc=dedekind@yandex.ru \
--cc=ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com \
--cc=jwboyer@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.