From: "Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>
To: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@yandex.ru>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com,
jwboyer@gmail.com, w@1wt.eu, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system)
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 16:22:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080402142245.GA18017@logfs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47F39575.40006@wpkg.org>
On Wed, 2 April 2008 16:17:25 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>
> [1] Well, it didn't die, really. Once I removed the file which was
> showing I/O errors and did "dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile", there are no
> badblocks anymore - probably remapped.
Could have been soft errors. Heaven knows how those devices report
uncorrectable errors, but claiming the block to be bad is a good guess.
Once blocks with uncorrectable errors are rewritten (the physical
blocks, not what the device reports), they are perfectly usable again.
Jörn
--
They laughed at Galileo. They laughed at Copernicus. They laughed at
Columbus. But remember, they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
-- unknown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-02 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-01 8:02 UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system) Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-04-01 8:45 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-01 9:03 ` Jörn Engel
2008-04-01 9:09 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-01 9:31 ` Jörn Engel
2008-04-01 9:39 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-04-01 9:57 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-02 14:17 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-04-02 14:22 ` Jörn Engel [this message]
2008-04-01 11:06 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-01 11:23 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-01 16:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-01 21:26 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-04-02 4:47 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-02 6:25 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-04-02 7:17 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-09 21:09 ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-09 21:32 ` Jörn Engel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-27 14:55 [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system Artem Bityutskiy
2008-03-31 12:29 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-03-31 12:47 ` Adrian Hunter
2008-03-31 13:20 ` Jörn Engel
2008-04-01 5:26 ` UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system) Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-01 5:28 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-01 5:56 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-01 9:25 ` Jörn Engel
2008-04-01 9:39 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-01 10:51 ` Jörn Engel
2008-04-01 11:17 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-01 9:19 ` Jörn Engel
2008-04-01 9:46 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-01 11:16 ` Jörn Engel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080402142245.GA18017@logfs.org \
--to=joern@logfs.org \
--cc=dedekind@yandex.ru \
--cc=ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jwboyer@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.