From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
mingo@elte.hu, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, voyager: fix ioremap_nocache()
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:45:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080428004507.GY5882@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080427203127.3c7d0e58@bree.surriel.com>
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 08:31:27PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> > You can post whatever patches you like a million times to lkml.
> > That's not the problem.
> >
> > It's that the patches don't get reviewed, posting them more or to a
> > different place doesn't help that.
>
> If you really want to enforce this, I bet it could be automated
> with scripts around git.
>
> Simply refuse to apply a patch that does not have at least two
> Signed-off-by/Reviewed-by/Acked-by lines and refuse to apply
> a "git pull" if there is a changeset like that in the tree.
Yeah, right.
commit 138fe4e069798d9aa948a5402ff15e58f483ee4e
Author: Konrad Rzeszutek <ketuzsezr@darnok.org>
Date: Wed Apr 9 19:50:41 2008 -0700
Firmware: add iSCSI iBFT Support
...
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek <konradr@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
...
+static ssize_t sprintf_ipaddr(char *buf, u8 *ip)
+{
...
+ str += sprintf(str, NIP6_FMT, ntohs(ip[0]), ntohs(ip[1]),
+ ntohs(ip[2]), ntohs(ip[3]), ntohs(ip[4]),
+ ntohs(ip[5]), ntohs(ip[6]), ntohs(ip[7]));
are you going to tell me that this had been reviewed? Note these
ntohs() applied to 8bit values in there. Two signed-off-by, including
Greg "two s-o-b are enough to guarantee review"...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-28 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-27 20:51 Breakage caused by unreviewed patch in x86 tree James Bottomley
2008-04-27 20:53 ` David Miller
2008-04-27 21:48 ` [patch] x86, voyager: fix ioremap_nocache() Ingo Molnar
2008-04-27 22:05 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-27 22:36 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-04-27 22:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-27 23:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-27 23:31 ` David Miller
2008-04-28 0:31 ` Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 0:45 ` Al Viro [this message]
2008-04-28 0:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-28 9:01 ` Alan Cox
2008-04-28 9:17 ` David Miller
2008-04-28 9:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-28 11:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 6:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-28 16:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:34 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-27 22:39 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-27 22:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:46 ` David Miller
2008-04-27 22:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:58 ` David Miller
2008-04-27 23:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-30 20:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-27 23:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-27 23:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-27 22:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:59 ` David Miller
2008-04-27 23:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-27 23:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-27 23:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-30 21:44 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-30 22:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 23:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-04-28 14:10 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-28 14:29 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-28 15:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-28 19:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:00 ` Breakage caused by unreviewed patch in x86 tree H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:10 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-27 22:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:18 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-27 22:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-27 23:00 ` David Miller
2008-04-27 23:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-27 23:03 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-27 23:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-27 23:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080428004507.GY5882@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.