From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 ACPI: normalize segment descriptor register on resume
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:51:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080626085110.GA18599@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200806261040.00646.rjw@sisk.pl>
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Thursday, 26 of June 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Len seems to think that Rafael seems to think that Ingo seems to think
> > > that this patch broke one of his boxes.
> > >
> > > Is it so?
> >
> > No! :-)
> >
> > it found a pre-existing suspend+resume breakage on a testbox. (I.e.
> > the debug patch worked as i'd expect it to work. Every good debug
> > patch starts its lifetime with a sharp spike of breakages it finds.)
>
> Does it mean that the $subject patch doesn't break your test box after
> all?
it doesnt break it - i get the same suspend+resume breakage without that
patch as well, if i do it manually.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-26 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-24 21:03 [PATCH] x86 ACPI: normalize segment descriptor register on resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-24 21:46 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-24 21:46 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-25 17:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-25 20:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-25 20:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-26 8:17 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-26 8:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-26 8:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-26 8:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-26 8:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-26 8:51 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-06-26 8:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-26 8:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-26 8:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-26 8:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-26 8:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-26 8:17 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-25 17:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-24 21:47 ` Len Brown
2008-06-24 21:47 ` Len Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-24 21:03 Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080626085110.GA18599@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.