From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Implement personality ADDR_LIMIT_32BIT
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 11:17:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081006081717.GA20072@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87abdintds.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2024 bytes --]
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:13:19AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> writes:
> >
> >>
> >> but more generally, we already have ADDR_LIMIT_3GB support on x86.
> >
> > Does ADDR_LIMIT_3GB really work?
>
> As Arjan pointed out it only takes effect on exec()
>
> andi@basil:~/tsrc> cat tstack2.c
> #include <stdio.h>
> int main(void)
> {
> void *p = &p;
> printf("%p\n", &p);
> return 0;
> }
> andi@basil:~/tsrc> gcc -m32 tstack2.c -o tstack2
> andi@basil:~/tsrc> ./tstack2
> 0xff807d70
> andi@basil:~/tsrc> linux32 --3gb ./tstack2
> 0xbfae2840
Which kernel do you use?
Does it work only when compiled with -m32?
$ cat 1.c
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
void *p = &p;
printf("%p\n", &p);
return 0;
}
$ gcc 1.c
$ linux32 --3gb ./a.out
0x7fffa667e7b8
> >> Why
> >> should support for ADDR_LIMIT_32BIT be added?
> >
> > It's useful for user mode qemu when you try emulate 32-bit target on
> > x86_64. For example, if shmat(2) return addres above 32-bit, target will
> > get SIGSEGV on access to it.
>
> The traditional way in mmap() to handle this is to give it a search
> hint < 4GB and then free the memory again/fail if the result was >4GB.
mmap() has MAP_32BIT flag on x86_64.
> Unfortunately that doesn't work for shmat() because the address argument
> is not a search hint, but a fixed address.
>
> I presume you need this for the qemu syscall emulation. For a standard
> application I would just recommend to use mmap with tmpfs instead
> (sysv shm is kind of obsolete). For shmat() emulation the cleanest way
> would be probably to add a new flag to shmat() that says that address
> is a search hint, not a fixed address. Then implement it the way recommended
> above.
I prefer one handle to switch application to 32-bit address mode. Why is it
wrong?
--
Regards, Kirill A. Shutemov
+ Belarus, Minsk
+ ALT Linux Team, http://www.altlinux.com/
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-06 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-03 7:04 [PATCH] x86_64: Implement personality ADDR_LIMIT_32BIT Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-10-03 7:04 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-10-03 8:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-03 8:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-03 9:25 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-10-03 12:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-03 12:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-03 12:58 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-10-06 6:13 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 6:13 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 8:17 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2008-10-06 8:42 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 8:42 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 9:17 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-10-06 9:56 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 9:56 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 10:12 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-10-06 13:26 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 13:26 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 14:37 ` [PATCH, RFC] shmat: introduce flag SHM_MAP_HINT Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-10-06 14:37 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-10-06 19:29 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 19:29 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 6:57 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-10-07 6:57 ` [PATCH, RFC, v2] " Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-10-07 6:57 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-10-07 8:20 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 8:20 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 10:09 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-10-07 11:26 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 11:26 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 11:23 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-10-07 14:38 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-10-07 14:38 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-10-07 15:10 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 15:10 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 11:08 ` [PATCH, RFC] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-10-07 11:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-10-07 11:21 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 11:21 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 11:21 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-10-07 11:26 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-10-07 11:26 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-10-07 11:30 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-10-07 11:50 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 11:50 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 11:24 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-10-07 12:31 ` Alan Cox
2008-10-07 12:31 ` Alan Cox
2008-10-07 13:14 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 13:14 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-03 9:33 ` [PATCH] x86_64: Implement personality ADDR_LIMIT_32BIT Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-10-03 9:33 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081006081717.GA20072@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.